• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知筛查测试(Triagem Cognitiva - TRIACOG)用于计算机介导评估的改编版:TRIACOG-在线版。

Adaptation of the Cognitive Screening Test (Triagem Cognitiva - TRIACOG) for computer-mediated assessments: TRIACOG-Online.

作者信息

Muner Luana Comito, Rodrigues Jaqueline de Carvalho, Becker Natália

机构信息

Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie.

Faculdade Cathedral.

出版信息

Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2024 Sep 3:1-9. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2024.2398118.

DOI:10.1080/23279095.2024.2398118
PMID:39227317
Abstract

This study aims to present the adaptation, evidence of content validity and results of a pilot study of the Cognitive Screening Test - Online (TRIACOG-Online) in a clinical sample of patients after stroke. The process comprised four stages: 1) Adaptation of the instructions, stimulus and responses; 2) Seven experts analyzed the equivalence between the previous printed version and the online version; 3) A pilot study was carried out with seven adults who had experienced a stroke in order to check the comprehension and feasibility of the items; and 4) The development of the final version of TRIACOG-Online. Expert validity testing of the questionnaire yielded a content validity index (CVI) of 100% for correspondence and construct in 13 items, and a CVI of 87.71% in four items. In the pilot study, problems related to the internet led to the decision to use a single section form. No difficulties were observed in carrying out the tasks and understanding the instructions. Participants reported being able to adequately visualize the stimuli and remain motivated to complete the tasks presented. It was shown that TRIACOG-Online evaluated the same constructs as the pencil-and-paper version, can be used in remote neuropsychological assessments and face-to-face settings.

摘要

本研究旨在展示认知筛查测试 - 在线版(TRIACOG - Online)在中风后患者临床样本中的适应性、内容效度证据及预试验结果。该过程包括四个阶段:1)指令、刺激和反应的改编;2)七位专家分析先前印刷版与在线版之间的等效性;3)对七名中风成年患者进行预试验,以检查项目的理解程度和可行性;4)TRIACOG - Online最终版本的开发。问卷的专家效度测试得出,13个项目在对应性和结构方面的内容效度指数(CVI)为100%,4个项目的CVI为87.71%。在预试验中,与网络相关的问题导致决定采用单部分形式。在执行任务和理解指令方面未观察到困难。参与者报告称能够充分想象刺激内容,并保持完成所呈现任务的积极性。结果表明,TRIACOG - Online与纸笔版评估相同的结构,可用于远程神经心理学评估和面对面评估。

相似文献

1
Adaptation of the Cognitive Screening Test (Triagem Cognitiva - TRIACOG) for computer-mediated assessments: TRIACOG-Online.认知筛查测试(Triagem Cognitiva - TRIACOG)用于计算机介导评估的改编版:TRIACOG-在线版。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2024 Sep 3:1-9. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2024.2398118.
2
Evidence of validity based on the relation to other variables and inter-rater reliability of the Cognitive Screening (TRIACOG) for adults with cerebrovascular diseases.基于与其他变量的关系和对脑血管病成人的认知筛查(TRIACOG)的评分者间信度的有效性证据。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2023 Mar-Apr;30(2):259-268. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2021.1931219. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
3
Psychometric assessment of the Chinese version of the Problems and Needs in Palliative Care questionnaire-short version in advanced cancer patients.中文版晚期癌症患者舒缓护理问题和需求问卷简表的心理计量学评估。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Aug 6;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0450-5.
4
Portuguese Physical Literacy Assessment Questionnaire (PPLA-Q) for adolescents (15-18 years) from grades 10-12: development, content validation and pilot testing.青少年(15-18 岁)身体素养评估问卷(PPLA-Q)葡萄牙语版(适用于 10-12 年级):编制、内容效度验证及预试验研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 29;21(1):2183. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12230-5.
5
Development and content validity testing of a colonoscopy-specific patient-reported experience measure: the Patient Experience Colonoscopy Scale (PECS).开发并对结肠镜检查特异性患者报告体验量表(PECS)进行内容效度检验。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Mar 18;8(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00710-2.
6
Psychological assessment via the internet: a reliability and validity study of online (vs paper-and-pencil) versions of the General Health Questionnaire-28 (GHQ-28) and the Symptoms Check-List-90-Revised (SCL-90-R).通过互联网进行心理评估:一般健康问卷-28(GHQ-28)和症状自评量表90修订版(SCL-90-R)在线(与纸笔)版本的信度和效度研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2007 Jan 31;9(1):e2. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.1.e2.
7
Internal consistency and measurement equivalence of the cannabis screening questions on the paper-and-pencil face-to-face ASSIST versus the online instrument.纸质面对面版ASSIST与在线版ASSIST中大麻筛查问题的内部一致性和测量等效性。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2015 Mar 8;10:8. doi: 10.1186/s13011-015-0002-9.
8
The Swedish version of the Normalization Process Theory Measure S-NoMAD: translation, adaptation, and pilot testing.《正常化进程理论测量 S-NoMAD 瑞典语版:翻译、改编和初步测试》
Implement Sci. 2018 Dec 4;13(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0835-5.
9
Longitudinal neuropsychological performance of post-stroke adults with and without rehabilitation.有康复和无康复的中风后成年人的纵向神经心理学表现
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2024 May 23:1-10. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2024.2353304.
10
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of the Malay Version of the Protection Motivation Theory Scale Questionnaire for Pap Smear Screening.马来语版巴氏涂片筛查保护动机理论量表问卷的翻译、跨文化调适和验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 3;19(11):6858. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116858.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity Evidence of the TRIACOG-Online Administered In-Person to Adults Post Stroke.针对中风后成人的TRIACOG在线面对面管理的效度证据。
Brain Sci. 2025 Jul 10;15(7):737. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15070737.