Kim Ki Yeon, Ko Hwa Yeon, Bea Sungho, Lee Ho-Jin, Shin Ju-Young, Chu Min Kyung
Department of Biohealth Regulatory Science, School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea.
School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea.
J Clin Neurol. 2024 Sep;20(5):529-536. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2023.0485.
Migraine is one of the most common chronic neurological diseases worldwide. Although diverse treatment regimens have been recommended, there is insufficient evidence for which treatment patterns to apply in routine clinical settings.
We used nationwide claims data from South Korea for 2015-2021 to identify incident migraine patients with at least one prescription for migraine. Patients were categorized according to their initial treatment classes and followed up from the date of treatment initiation. Treatment regimens included prophylactic treatments (antidepressants, anticonvulsants, beta blockers, calcium-channel blockers, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system [RAAS] inhibitors) and acute treatments (acetaminophen, antiemetics, aspirin, ergotamine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], opioids, and triptans). The treatment patterns of migraine were evaluated until the end of the study period, including the secular trends, prevalence, persistence, and changes in migraine treatment.
Among the 761,350 included patients who received migraine treatment, the most frequently prescribed acute treatment was an NSAID (69.9%), followed by acetaminophen (50.0%). The most-prescribed prophylactic treatment was flunarizine (36.9%), followed by propranolol (24.4%). Among the patients, 54.8% received acute treatment, 13.5% received prophylactic treatment, and 31.6% received both treatment types. However, 65.7% of the patients discontinued their treatment within 3 months. The 3-month persistence rate was highest for triptans (25.2%) among the acute treatments and for RAAS inhibitors (62.0%) among the prophylactic treatments.
While the prevalence rates of medication use were found to align with current migraine guidelines, frequent switching and rapid discontinuation of drugs were observed in routine clinical settings.
偏头痛是全球最常见的慢性神经疾病之一。尽管已推荐了多种治疗方案,但在常规临床环境中应用哪种治疗模式的证据不足。
我们使用了韩国2015 - 2021年的全国索赔数据,以识别至少有一张偏头痛处方的偏头痛新发病例患者。患者根据其初始治疗类别进行分类,并从治疗开始之日起进行随访。治疗方案包括预防性治疗(抗抑郁药、抗惊厥药、β受体阻滞剂、钙通道阻滞剂和肾素 - 血管紧张素 - 醛固酮系统[RAAS]抑制剂)和急性治疗(对乙酰氨基酚、止吐药、阿司匹林、麦角胺、非甾体抗炎药[NSAIDs]、阿片类药物和曲坦类药物)。评估偏头痛的治疗模式直至研究期结束,包括长期趋势、患病率、持续性以及偏头痛治疗的变化。
在761350名接受偏头痛治疗的纳入患者中,最常开具的急性治疗药物是NSAIDs(69.9%),其次是对乙酰氨基酚(50.0%)。最常开具的预防性治疗药物是氟桂利嗪(36.9%),其次是普萘洛尔(24.4%)。在患者中,54.8%接受急性治疗,13.5%接受预防性治疗,31.6%接受两种治疗。然而,65.7%的患者在3个月内停止了治疗。急性治疗中曲坦类药物的3个月持续率最高(25.2%),预防性治疗中RAAS抑制剂的3个月持续率最高(62.0%)。
虽然发现药物使用的患病率与当前偏头痛指南一致,但在常规临床环境中观察到频繁换药和快速停药的情况。