Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Neurology, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 3;14(1):20429. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71402-6.
The objectives of this study were to investigate the variable factors associated with cognitive function and cortical atrophy and estimated variable importance of those factors in affecting cognitive function and cortical atrophy in patients with EOAD and LOAD. Patients with EOAD (n = 40), LOAD (n = 34), and healthy volunteers with normal cognition were included (n = 65). All of them performed 3T MRI, [F]THK5351 PET (THK), [F]flutemetamol PET (FLUTE), and detailed neuropsychological tests. To investigate factors associated with neuropsychological test results and cortical thickness in each group, we conducted multivariable linear regression models, including amyloid, tau, cerebral small vessel disease markers on MRI, and vascular risk factors. Then, we estimated variable importance in associating cognitive functions and cortical thickness, using relative importance analysis. In patients with EOAD, global THK retention was the most important contributor to the model variances for most neuropsychological tests, except for memory. However, in patients with LOAD, multiple contributors beyond tau were important in explaining variance of neuropsychological tests. In analyses with mean cortical thickness, global THK retention was the main contributor in patients with EOAD, while in LOAD patients, multiple factors contributed equally to mean cortical thickness. Therefore, EOAD and LOAD may have different pathomechanistic courses.
本研究的目的是探讨与认知功能和皮质萎缩相关的可变因素,并评估这些因素对 EOAD 和 LOAD 患者认知功能和皮质萎缩的影响的重要性。纳入了 EOAD 患者(n=40)、LOAD 患者(n=34)和认知正常的健康志愿者(n=65)。所有患者均进行了 3T MRI、[F]THK5351 PET(THK)、[F]flutemetamol PET(FLUTE)和详细的神经心理学测试。为了研究每个组中与神经心理学测试结果和皮质厚度相关的因素,我们进行了多变量线性回归模型,包括 MRI 上的淀粉样蛋白、tau、脑小血管疾病标志物和血管危险因素。然后,我们使用相对重要性分析来估计与认知功能和皮质厚度相关的变量的重要性。在 EOAD 患者中,除了记忆之外,大多数神经心理学测试的模型方差中,全局 THK 保留是最重要的贡献者。然而,在 LOAD 患者中,tau 以外的多个因素对于解释神经心理学测试的方差很重要。在平均皮质厚度的分析中,全局 THK 保留是 EOAD 患者的主要贡献者,而在 LOAD 患者中,多个因素对平均皮质厚度的贡献相等。因此,EOAD 和 LOAD 可能具有不同的发病机制。