Suppr超能文献

阿司咪唑、特非那定与安慰剂治疗花粉症的双盲比较:特别关注起效时间

Double-blind comparison of astemizole, terfenadine and placebo in hay fever with special regard to onset of action.

作者信息

Girard J P, Sommacal-Schopf D, Bigliardi P, Henauer S A

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 1985;13(2):102-8. doi: 10.1177/030006058501300205.

Abstract

In this double-blind study forty-seven patients with hay fever were treated for 8 days with either terfenadine 60 mg twice a day, astemizole 10 mg once a day or placebo. On the second day of treatment terfenadine was statistically significantly superior to astemizole and placebo according to the ratings of symptomatology, efficacy and individual symptoms. The median onset of symptom alleviation was 3 hours for terfenadine and 2 days for astemizole. On the eighth day both astemizole and terfenadine were statistically significantly more efficacious than placebo, but no significant differences were found between the two drugs. Both drugs were well tolerated.

摘要

在这项双盲研究中,47名花粉热患者接受了为期8天的治疗,治疗方案为:特非那定每日两次,每次60毫克;阿司咪唑每日一次,每次10毫克;或安慰剂。根据症状学、疗效和个体症状评分,在治疗的第二天,特非那定在统计学上显著优于阿司咪唑和安慰剂。特非那定症状缓解的中位起效时间为3小时,阿司咪唑为2天。在第八天,阿司咪唑和特非那定在统计学上均显著优于安慰剂,但两种药物之间未发现显著差异。两种药物耐受性良好。

相似文献

8
Astemizole and terfenadine compared in hay fever.
Practitioner. 1986 Jan;230(1411):41-4.

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验