Ortuño Román Romero, Duggan Eoin
FRAILMatics research group, Discipline of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Falls and Syncope Unit, Mercer's Institute for Successful Ageing, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls. 2024 Sep 1;9(3):227-231. doi: 10.22540/JFSF-09-227. eCollection 2024 Sep.
In 1998, Fried and Walston introduced the Cycle of Frailty (CF) as a foundational concept for defining the physical frailty phenotype (FP). While the FP has been extensively validated, the CF hypothesis lacks equivalent support. This study aimed to internally validate the CF using structural equation modeling (SEM) in a clinical dataset of adults aged 50 or older attending an outpatient falls clinic. Measures included: age, morbidity, nutrition, sarcopenia by bioelectrical impedance, VOmax, handgrip strength, basal metabolic rate (BMR), 5-times chair stand test (5CST), physical activity, and total energy expenditure (TEE). The SEM, incorporating CF hypothesized causal pathways, was tested using IBM® SPSS® Amos 27.0.0 (maximum likelihood method) with a sample of 102 adults (mean age 69.8 years, 58.8% women). Overall, the SEM was supported by the data (χ = 44.4, df = 37, p = 0.189), with significant (p < 0.05) regression weights for morbidity→sarcopenia, age→sarcopenia, sarcopenia→VOmax, sarcopenia→handgrip strength, handgrip strength→5CST, physical activity→TEE, TEE→nutrition, and BMR→TEE. However, nutrition→sarcopenia, sarcopenia→BMR, VOmax→5CST, and 5CST→physical activity were not significant. Although the SEM was limited by inclusion of surrogate CF measures (e.g., 5CST instead of gait speed, VOmax based on age-predicted maximal/resting heart rate), it provided some internal support for the CF hypothesis.
1998年,弗里德和沃尔斯顿提出了衰弱循环(CF)这一概念,作为定义身体衰弱表型(FP)的基础概念。虽然FP已得到广泛验证,但CF假说缺乏同等的支持。本研究旨在使用结构方程模型(SEM)在一个50岁及以上门诊跌倒诊所成年患者的临床数据集中对CF进行内部验证。测量指标包括:年龄、发病率、营养状况、通过生物电阻抗测定的肌肉减少症、最大摄氧量(VOmax)、握力、基础代谢率(BMR)、5次起坐试验(5CST)、身体活动和总能量消耗(TEE)。采用IBM® SPSS® Amos 27.0.0(最大似然法)对纳入CF假设因果路径的SEM进行检验,样本为102名成年人(平均年龄69.8岁,女性占58.8%)。总体而言,数据支持SEM(χ = 44.4,自由度 = 37,p = 0.189),发病率→肌肉减少症、年龄→肌肉减少症、肌肉减少症→VOmax、肌肉减少症→握力、握力→5CST、身体活动→TEE、TEE→营养状况以及BMR→TEE的回归权重具有显著性(p < 0.05)。然而,营养状况→肌肉减少症、肌肉减少症→BMR、VOmax→5CST以及5CST→身体活动并不显著。尽管SEM因纳入替代CF测量指标(例如,用5CST替代步速,基于年龄预测的最大/静息心率计算VOmax)而受到限制,但它为CF假说提供了一定的内部支持。