National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Diseases, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Institute of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Front Immunol. 2024 Aug 20;15:1430648. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1430648. eCollection 2024.
Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) is known for its unfavorable survival prognosis. Chidamide has shown efficacy in relapsed/refractory AITL, but its efficacy in newly diagnosed AITL is uncertain.
This retrospective research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of chidamide when used with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, prednisone, and vincristine (CHOP) in comparison to CHOP by itself for individuals newly diagnosed with AITL, and to examine the impact of transplantation.
This was an analysis that compared outcomes among patients who received chidamide + CHOP on a clinical trial vs. historical controls who received CHOP alone, enrolling a total of sixty-six treatment-naive AITL patients between April 2014 and November 2022. Among them, thirty-three received chidamide in addition to CHOP (chidamide group), while thirty-three received CHOP alone (control group). The clinical characteristics were balanced between the two groups. All patients were scheduled to undergo up to six courses of treatment before transplantation.
The chidamide group had a significantly longer median overall survival (OS) compared to the control group, with a median OS that was not reached, as opposed to 20 months in the control group (p = 0.002). In the control group, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11 months, while in the chidamide group, it was 22 months (p = 0.080). In the high-risk group (IPI ≥ 3), the chidamide group demonstrated notably superior complete response (CR) and overall response rate (ORR) compared to the control cohort (p = 0.002, p = 0.034). The PFS and OS in the chidamide group were not reached, and there were significant differences compared to the control group (p = 0.007, p = 0.003). The median OS of the transplanted group was longer than the non-transplanted group (p = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, chidamide group reduced the hazards of death in the total cohort.
As the study was non-random and retrospective, Chidamide combined with chemotherapy should be tested in randomized trials given its potential to improve prognosis in treatment-naive AITL patients. Furthermore, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) has demonstrated enhanced overall survival in individuals with AITL.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/, NCT03268889.
血管免疫母细胞性 T 细胞淋巴瘤(AITL)的预后不良。西达本胺已显示出在复发性/难治性 AITL 中的疗效,但在新诊断的 AITL 中的疗效尚不确定。
本回顾性研究旨在评估西达本胺联合多柔比星、环磷酰胺、泼尼松和长春新碱(CHOP)与单独使用 CHOP 治疗新诊断的 AITL 患者的有效性和安全性,并探讨移植的影响。
这是一项分析,比较了 66 名在临床试验中接受西达本胺+CHOP 治疗的患者与 2014 年 4 月至 2022 年 11 月期间仅接受 CHOP 治疗的历史对照患者的结果。其中,33 名患者接受西达本胺联合 CHOP(西达本胺组),33 名患者仅接受 CHOP(对照组)。两组的临床特征平衡。所有患者在移植前均计划接受最多 6 个疗程的治疗。
与对照组相比,西达本胺组的中位总生存期(OS)显著延长,中位 OS 未达到,而对照组为 20 个月(p=0.002)。对照组中位无进展生存期(PFS)为 11 个月,而西达本胺组为 22 个月(p=0.080)。在高危组(IPI≥3)中,西达本胺组的完全缓解(CR)和总缓解率(ORR)明显优于对照组(p=0.002,p=0.034)。西达本胺组的 PFS 和 OS 均未达到,与对照组相比差异有统计学意义(p=0.007,p=0.003)。移植组的中位 OS 长于未移植组(p=0.004)。多变量分析显示,西达本胺组降低了总队列的死亡风险。
由于该研究是非随机和回顾性的,考虑到西达本胺有可能改善新诊断的 AITL 患者的预后,因此应该在随机试验中对其进行测试。此外,自体造血干细胞移植(auto-HSCT)已显示出在 AITL 患者中提高总生存率的作用。
[临床试验注册编号],NCT03268889。