• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在检测结直肠癌患者转移灶方面,CT与MRI诊断准确性的评估比较

Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of CT as Compared to MRI in Detecting Metastases in Patients With Colorectal Cancer.

作者信息

Alhammami Qaed S

机构信息

Radiology, Najran University, Najran, SAU.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Aug 4;16(8):e66125. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66125. eCollection 2024 Aug.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.66125
PMID:39229423
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11370816/
Abstract

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting metastases of colorectal cancer (CRC) in a hospital in Najran, Saudi Arabia. A total of 51 patients with CRC were included in the study. The radiological findings of metastatic lesions and the diagnostic accuracy measures of CT compared to MRI were analyzed. The results showed that CT had a false negative rate of 7.8%, a false positive rate of 7.8%, a true negative rate of 27.5%, and a true positive rate of 56.9% in detecting metastases. Diagnostic accuracy measures varied based on the number of metastatic lesions, with higher sensitivity observed for cases with fewer lesions. Gender, timing of imaging in relation to surgical intervention, and administration of nonsurgical therapy showed significant associations with diagnosis mismatch between CT and MRI. The site of metastases and the site of the primary tumor in the colon also demonstrated significant associations with diagnosis mismatch. The size of the largest metastasis detected by MRI was significantly associated with diagnosis mismatch. The overall diagnostic accuracy of CT in detecting any metastases, compared to MRI as the reference standard, was estimated to have a sensitivity of 87.8%, a specificity of 77.8%, a positive predictive value of 87.8%, and a negative predictive value of 77.8%. This study provides valuable insights into the comparative diagnostic performance of CT and MRI in detecting metastases of CRC, highlighting the importance of considering patient characteristics, disease outcome, and tumor characteristics in the interpretation of imaging results.

摘要

本研究旨在比较计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)在沙特阿拉伯纳季兰一家医院检测结直肠癌(CRC)转移灶方面的诊断准确性。共有51例CRC患者纳入本研究。分析了转移灶的影像学表现以及CT与MRI相比的诊断准确性指标。结果显示,CT在检测转移灶时的假阴性率为7.8%,假阳性率为7.8%,真阴性率为27.5%,真阳性率为56.9%。诊断准确性指标因转移灶数量而异,转移灶较少的病例敏感性较高。性别、成像时间与手术干预的关系以及非手术治疗的实施与CT和MRI之间的诊断不匹配显著相关。转移灶部位和结肠原发肿瘤部位也与诊断不匹配显著相关。MRI检测到的最大转移灶大小与诊断不匹配显著相关。以MRI作为参考标准,CT检测任何转移灶的总体诊断准确性估计为:敏感性87.8%,特异性77.8%,阳性预测值87.8%,阴性预测值77.8%。本研究为CT和MRI在检测CRC转移灶方面的比较诊断性能提供了有价值的见解,强调了在解读影像结果时考虑患者特征、疾病转归和肿瘤特征的重要性。

相似文献

1
Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of CT as Compared to MRI in Detecting Metastases in Patients With Colorectal Cancer.在检测结直肠癌患者转移灶方面,CT与MRI诊断准确性的评估比较
Cureus. 2024 Aug 4;16(8):e66125. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66125. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Ultrasound, CT, MRI, or PET-CT for staging and re-staging of adults with cutaneous melanoma.超声、CT、MRI或PET-CT用于成人皮肤黑色素瘤的分期及再分期。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 1;7(7):CD012806. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012806.pub2.
3
123I-MIBG scintigraphy and 18F-FDG-PET imaging for diagnosing neuroblastoma.用于诊断神经母细胞瘤的123I-间碘苄胍闪烁扫描术和18F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层显像
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 29;2015(9):CD009263. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009263.pub2.
4
More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using F-PSMA PET/CT.使用F-PSMA PET/CT检测前列腺癌骨和软组织转移方面有更多优势。
Hell J Nucl Med. 2019 Jan-Apr;22(1):6-9. doi: 10.1967/s002449910952. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
5
Role of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of small hepatic lesions in patients with colorectal cancer.钆塞酸二钠增强磁共振成像在结直肠癌患者小肝脏病变术前评估中的作用
World J Surg. 2015 May;39(5):1161-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-2944-5.
6
Comparison of FDG PET/CT and MRI in lymph node staging of endometrial cancer.18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(FDG PET/CT)与磁共振成像(MRI)在子宫内膜癌淋巴结分期中的比较
Ann Nucl Med. 2016 Feb;30(2):104-13. doi: 10.1007/s12149-015-1037-8. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
7
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue® (sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles) compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the characterisation of focal liver lesions and detection of liver metastases: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.超声造影使用声诺维®(六氟化硫微泡)与对比增强计算机断层扫描和对比增强磁共振成像在局灶性肝脏病变的特征描述和肝转移检测中的比较:系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Apr;17(16):1-243. doi: 10.3310/hta17160.
8
Pulmonary nodules and metastases in colorectal cancer.结直肠癌中的肺结节与转移
Dan Med J. 2016 Jan;63(1):B5190.
9
Initial experience with positron emission tomography/computed tomography in addition to computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative risk assessment of endometrial cancer patients.正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描联合计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像在子宫内膜癌患者术前风险评估中的初步经验。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Apr;259:46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.01.052. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
10
The diagnostic performance of F-FDG PET/CT, CT and MRI in the treatment evaluation of ablation therapy for colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.F-FDG PET/CT、CT和MRI在结直肠癌肝转移消融治疗疗效评估中的诊断性能:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Surg Oncol. 2017 Mar;26(1):37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2016.12.006. Epub 2016 Dec 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Preoperative assessment of lymph node metastasis in Colon Cancer patients using machine learning: a pilot study.使用机器学习对结肠癌患者的淋巴结转移进行术前评估:一项初步研究。
Cancer Imaging. 2020 Apr 25;20(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40644-020-00308-z.
2
Imaging of Colorectal Liver Metastases: New Developments and Pending Issues.结直肠癌肝转移的影像学:新进展与待解决问题
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jan 8;12(1):151. doi: 10.3390/cancers12010151.
3
Establishment of a new non-invasive imaging prediction model for liver metastasis in colon cancer.建立一种用于结肠癌肝转移的新型非侵入性成像预测模型。
Am J Cancer Res. 2019 Nov 1;9(11):2482-2492. eCollection 2019.
4
Performance comparison between MRI and CT for local staging of sigmoid and descending colon cancer.MRI 和 CT 对乙状结肠和降结肠癌局部分期的性能比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Dec;121:108741. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108741. Epub 2019 Nov 10.
5
Diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MRI versus multidetector CT in the assessment of colorectal liver metastases compared to hepatic resection.钆塞酸增强肝脏 MRI 与多排 CT 诊断结直肠癌肝转移与肝切除术后对比评估的性能比较。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul 24;19(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1036-7.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of whole-body MRI versus standard imaging pathways for metastatic disease in newly diagnosed colorectal cancer: the prospective Streamline C trial.新发结直肠癌转移病灶的全身 MRI 与标准影像学检测路径的诊断准确性:前瞻性 Streamline C 试验
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jul;4(7):529-537. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30056-1. Epub 2019 May 9.
7
Colon cancer screening with CT colonography: logistics, cost-effectiveness, efficiency and progress.CT结肠成像用于结肠癌筛查:后勤保障、成本效益、效率及进展
Br J Radiol. 2018 Oct;91(1090):20180307. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180307. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
8
Diagnostic accuracy of CE-CT, MRI and FDG PET/CT for detecting colorectal cancer liver metastases in patients considered eligible for hepatic resection and/or local ablation.CE-CT、MRI 和 FDG PET/CT 检测适合肝切除和/或局部消融治疗的结直肠癌肝转移患者的诊断准确性。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Nov;28(11):4735-4747. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5469-0. Epub 2018 May 7.
9
MRI for Local Staging of Colon Cancer: Can MRI Become the Optimal Staging Modality for Patients With Colon Cancer?用于结肠癌局部分期的磁共振成像:磁共振成像能否成为结肠癌患者的最佳分期方式?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Apr;60(4):385-392. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000794.
10
Assessment of metastatic colorectal cancer with hybrid imaging: comparison of reading performance using different combinations of anatomical and functional imaging techniques in PET/MRI and PET/CT in a short case series.采用混合成像评估转移性结直肠癌:在一个短病例系列中比较PET/MRI和PET/CT中使用不同解剖学和功能成像技术组合的读片性能
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Jan;43(1):123-132. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3137-z. Epub 2015 Jul 31.