• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Federal Funding for Expensive Drugs for Rare Diseases: How Do We Pick and Choose?为罕见病昂贵药物提供联邦资金:我们该如何选择?
Healthc Policy. 2024 Aug;19(4):19-26. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2024.27334.
2
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
3
Systematic review on the evaluation criteria of orphan medicines in Central and Eastern European countries.中东欧国家罕见病药物评估标准的系统评价
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016 Jun 4;11(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0455-6.
4
The health economics of insulin therapy: How do we address the rising demands, costs, inequalities and barriers to achieving optimal outcomes.胰岛素治疗的卫生经济学:我们如何应对不断增长的需求、成本、不平等现象以及实现最佳治疗效果的障碍。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jul;27 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):24-35. doi: 10.1111/dom.16488. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
5
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
6
Reimbursement of Drugs for Rare Diseases through the Public Healthcare System in Canada: Where Are We Now?加拿大公共医疗体系下罕见病药物的报销情况:我们目前处于什么状况?
Healthc Policy. 2015 Aug;11(1):15-32.
7
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
8
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
9
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
10
A systematic review of moral reasons on orphan drug reimbursement.孤儿药补偿的道德理由系统评价。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Jun 30;16(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s13023-021-01925-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Commentary: Which Principles Should Apply for a National Strategy on Rare Diseases?述评:国家罕见病战略应遵循哪些原则?
Healthc Policy. 2024 Aug;19(4):27-31. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2024.27353.
2
Spending on Healthcare: What Is the Right Number?医疗保健支出:多少才合适?
Healthc Policy. 2024 Aug;19(4):6-18. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2024.27379.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality and quantity of data used by Health Canada in approving new drugs.加拿大卫生部在批准新药时所使用数据的质量和数量。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 30;10:1299239. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1299239. eCollection 2023.
2
Expensive Drugs for Rare Diseases in Canada: What Value and at What Cost?加拿大罕见病高价药物:有何价值,代价几何?
Healthc Pap. 2023 Jan;21(1):10-26. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2023.27000.
3
Use of Single-Arm Trials for US Food and Drug Administration Drug Approval in Oncology, 2002-2021.2002-2021 年美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)在肿瘤学中批准药物使用单臂试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Feb 1;9(2):266-272. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.5985.
4
HTA decision-making for drugs for rare diseases: comparison of processes across countries.罕见病药物的 HTA 决策:各国流程比较。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Jul 8;17(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02397-4.
5
Challenges in Evaluating Safety and Efficacy in Drug Development for Rare Diseases: A Review for Pharmacists.罕见病药物研发中评估安全性和有效性的挑战:药剂师综述
J Pharm Pract. 2021 Jun;34(3):472-479. doi: 10.1177/0897190020930972. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
6
Does an Orphan Drug Policy Make a Difference in Access? A Comparison of Canada and Australia.孤儿药政策对药物可及性有影响吗?加拿大与澳大利亚的比较。
Int J Health Serv. 2020 Apr;50(2):166-172. doi: 10.1177/0020731419886526. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
7
The Australian Managed Entry Scheme: Are We Getting it Right?澳大利亚管理准入计划:我们做对了吗?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 May;36(5):555-565. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0633-6.
8
A literature review on the representativeness of randomized controlled trial samples and implications for the external validity of trial results.关于随机对照试验样本代表性及其对试验结果外部有效性影响的文献综述。
Trials. 2015 Nov 3;16:495. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1023-4.
9
Drug safety assessment in clinical trials: methodological challenges and opportunities.临床试验中的药物安全性评估:方法学挑战与机遇。
Trials. 2012 Aug 20;13:138. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-138.

为罕见病昂贵药物提供联邦资金:我们该如何选择?

Federal Funding for Expensive Drugs for Rare Diseases: How Do We Pick and Choose?

机构信息

Professor Emeritus, School of Health Policy and Management, York University, Associate Professor, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.

Clinical Professor, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.

出版信息

Healthc Policy. 2024 Aug;19(4):19-26. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2024.27334.

DOI:10.12927/hcpol.2024.27334
PMID:39229659
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11411645/
Abstract

The number of expensive drugs for rare diseases (EDRDs) approved by Health Canada and their contribution to healthcare costs have been rapidly increasing. The federal government has announced a three-year funding commitment of $1.4 billion for EDRDs, but principles need to be developed for how that funding will be allocated, especially in cases where insufficient data are available to guide decision making. Here, we review the role of evidence quality in making choices and draw on the experience from other countries to put forward five principles about how the money should be spent.

摘要

加拿大卫生部批准的昂贵罕见病药物(EDRDs)的数量及其对医疗保健成本的贡献一直在迅速增加。联邦政府已宣布为 EDRDs 提供为期三年的 14 亿加元资金承诺,但需要制定资金分配原则,特别是在缺乏数据来指导决策的情况下。在这里,我们回顾了证据质量在决策中的作用,并借鉴其他国家的经验,提出了关于如何使用这些资金的五项原则。