• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Commentary: Which Principles Should Apply for a National Strategy on Rare Diseases?述评:国家罕见病战略应遵循哪些原则?
Healthc Policy. 2024 Aug;19(4):27-31. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2024.27353.
2
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
3
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
4
Public preferences for health and non-health outcomes of Universal Basic Income and alternative income-based policies: A mixed-method feasibility study.公众对普遍基本收入和其他基于收入的政策的健康与非健康结果的偏好:一项混合方法可行性研究。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jul 30:1-26. doi: 10.3310/ALDS8846.
5
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
6
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
7
Systematic review on the evaluation criteria of orphan medicines in Central and Eastern European countries.中东欧国家罕见病药物评估标准的系统评价
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016 Jun 4;11(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13023-016-0455-6.
8
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
9
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
10
The quality of economic evaluations of ultra-orphan drugs in Europe - a systematic review.欧洲超罕见病药物经济评估的质量——一项系统评价
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2015 Jul 30;10:92. doi: 10.1186/s13023-015-0305-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Spending on Healthcare: What Is the Right Number?医疗保健支出:多少才合适?
Healthc Policy. 2024 Aug;19(4):6-18. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2024.27379.

本文引用的文献

1
Federal Funding for Expensive Drugs for Rare Diseases: How Do We Pick and Choose?为罕见病昂贵药物提供联邦资金:我们该如何选择?
Healthc Policy. 2024 Aug;19(4):19-26. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2024.27334.
2
Stakeholder views of managed entry agreements: A literature review of national studies.利益相关者对有条件准入协议的看法:一项关于各国研究的文献综述
Health Policy Open. 2021 Jan 21;2:100032. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100032. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Implementing Outcomes-Based Managed Entry Agreements for Rare Disease Treatments: Nusinersen and Tisagenlecleucel.实施基于结果的罕见病治疗管理准入协议:诺西那生钠和Tisagenlecleucel。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Sep;39(9):1021-1044. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01050-5. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
4
Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements (PBRSA): Is it a Solution to Increase Bang for the Buck for Pharmaceutical Reimbursement Strategy for Our Nation and Around the World?基于绩效的风险分担安排(PBRSA):对于我们国家和世界各地的药品报销策略,这是一种增加效益的解决方案吗?
Clin Drug Investig. 2020 Dec;40(12):1107-1113. doi: 10.1007/s40261-020-00972-w. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
5
Managed Entry Agreements: Policy Analysis From the European Perspective.管理准入协议:欧洲视角的政策分析。
Value Health. 2020 Apr;23(4):425-433. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.12.008.
6
Orphans in the Market: The History of Orphan Drug Policy.市场中的孤儿药:孤儿药政策的历史
Soc Hist Med. 2019 Aug;32(3):609-630. doi: 10.1093/shm/hkx098. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
7
Risk-sharing agreements, present and future.风险分担协议,现状与未来。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2018 Apr 10;12:823. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2018.823. eCollection 2018.

述评:国家罕见病战略应遵循哪些原则?

Commentary: Which Principles Should Apply for a National Strategy on Rare Diseases?

机构信息

Associate Professor, School of Public Policy and Administration, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON.

出版信息

Healthc Policy. 2024 Aug;19(4):27-31. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2024.27353.

DOI:10.12927/hcpol.2024.27353
PMID:39229660
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11411644/
Abstract

Lexchin and Sirrs (2024) proposed five relevant principles to guide the use of federal funding for expensive drugs for rare diseases, including funding of outcomes-based risk-sharing agreements (OBRSAs) and proactive commitment and participation in the generation of high-quality evidence in a transparent way. This rejoinder, however, questions whether the federal funding should be used only to buy new drugs or whether it could be used to develop new drugs as well. It also examines what OBRSAs would require in terms of institutional capacities to allow the collection of real-world evidence.

摘要

莱克欣和赛尔斯(2024 年)提出了五项相关原则,以指导联邦资金用于治疗罕见病的昂贵药物,包括为基于结果的风险分担协议(OBRSAs)提供资金,以及以透明的方式积极承诺并参与高质量证据的生成。然而,这篇反驳文章质疑联邦资金是否应该仅用于购买新药,或者是否可以用于开发新药。它还研究了 OBRSAs 需要什么样的机构能力来允许收集真实世界的证据。