Suppr超能文献

述评:国家罕见病战略应遵循哪些原则?

Commentary: Which Principles Should Apply for a National Strategy on Rare Diseases?

机构信息

Associate Professor, School of Public Policy and Administration, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON.

出版信息

Healthc Policy. 2024 Aug;19(4):27-31. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2024.27353.

Abstract

Lexchin and Sirrs (2024) proposed five relevant principles to guide the use of federal funding for expensive drugs for rare diseases, including funding of outcomes-based risk-sharing agreements (OBRSAs) and proactive commitment and participation in the generation of high-quality evidence in a transparent way. This rejoinder, however, questions whether the federal funding should be used only to buy new drugs or whether it could be used to develop new drugs as well. It also examines what OBRSAs would require in terms of institutional capacities to allow the collection of real-world evidence.

摘要

莱克欣和赛尔斯(2024 年)提出了五项相关原则,以指导联邦资金用于治疗罕见病的昂贵药物,包括为基于结果的风险分担协议(OBRSAs)提供资金,以及以透明的方式积极承诺并参与高质量证据的生成。然而,这篇反驳文章质疑联邦资金是否应该仅用于购买新药,或者是否可以用于开发新药。它还研究了 OBRSAs 需要什么样的机构能力来允许收集真实世界的证据。

相似文献

9
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Spending on Healthcare: What Is the Right Number?医疗保健支出:多少才合适?
Healthc Policy. 2024 Aug;19(4):6-18. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2024.27379.

本文引用的文献

6
Orphans in the Market: The History of Orphan Drug Policy.市场中的孤儿药:孤儿药政策的历史
Soc Hist Med. 2019 Aug;32(3):609-630. doi: 10.1093/shm/hkx098. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
7
Risk-sharing agreements, present and future.风险分担协议,现状与未来。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2018 Apr 10;12:823. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2018.823. eCollection 2018.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验