Stent sizing in imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: potential benefits of a more cautious approach.
作者信息
Adriaenssens Tom, Sinnaeve Peter
机构信息
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
出版信息
EuroIntervention. 2024 Sep 2;20(17):e1053-e1055. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00049.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Stent sizing in imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: potential benefits of a more cautious approach.成像引导下经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的支架尺寸选择：采用更谨慎方法的潜在益处。
EuroIntervention. 2024 Sep 2;20(17):e1053-e1055. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00049.
2
Procedural Characteristics of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Their Clinical Implications.血管内超声引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的操作特点及其临床意义。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jul 19;11(14):e025258. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025258. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
3
Clinical Outcomes Following Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of 31 Studies and 17,882 Patients.血管内影像引导与冠状动脉造影引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗伴支架植入的临床结局：31 项研究和 17882 例患者的系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 26;10(24):2488-2498. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.051. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
4
Polymer-free stents for percutaneous coronary intervention in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.无聚合物支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗糖尿病患者：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Future Cardiol. 2024;20(9):485-497. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2024.2370688. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
5
Comparative analysis of third-generation dual-energy CT and IVUS for in-stent restenosis detection.第三代双能CT与血管内超声用于检测支架内再狭窄的对比分析
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Aug 20;25(1):614. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04836-z.
6
Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes Between Intravascular Ultrasound-, Optical Coherence Tomography- and Angiography-Guided Stent Implantation: A Meta-Analysis.血管内超声、光学相干断层成像和血管造影指导下支架置入的长期疗效比较：Meta 分析。
Angiology. 2024 Oct;75(9):809-819. doi: 10.1177/00033197231198674. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
7
IVUS-Guided Versus OCT-Guided Coronary Stent Implantation: A Critical Appraisal.血管内超声指导与光学相干断层成像指导冠状动脉支架置入术：批判性评价。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Dec;10(12):1487-1503. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.09.008.
8
Optical coherence tomography- vs angiography-guided coronary stent implantation in calcified lesions: the ILUMIEN IV trial.光学相干断层扫描与血管造影引导下钙化病变冠状动脉支架植入术：ILUMIEN IV试验
Eur Heart J. 2025 Aug 21;46(32):3201-3210. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf331.
9
Severe in-stent restenosis missed by coronary CT angiography and accurately detected with FFR.冠状动脉CT血管造影漏诊的严重支架内再狭窄，通过血流储备分数（FFR）准确检测。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Jan;33(1):119-120. doi: 10.1007/s10554-016-0971-4. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
10
Serial intracoronary imaging to predict efficacy and safety of magnesium-based resorbable scaffolds.连续冠状动脉内成像预测镁基可吸收支架的疗效和安全性。
EuroIntervention. 2024 Sep 16;20(18):e1124-e1126. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-E-24-00044.
本文引用的文献
1
Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided versus Angiography-Guided PCI.光学相干断层扫描引导与血管造影引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Oct 19;389(16):1466-1476. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2305861. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
2
OCT or Angiography Guidance for PCI in Complex Bifurcation Lesions.OCT 或血管造影指导复杂分叉病变的 PCI
N Engl J Med. 2023 Oct 19;389(16):1477-1487. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307770. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
3
Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided or Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The OCTIVUS Randomized Clinical Trial.光学相干断层成像引导或血管内超声引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗：OCTIVUS 随机临床试验。
Circulation. 2023 Oct 17;148(16):1195-1206. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.066429. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
4
Intravascular Imaging-Guided or Angiography-Guided Complex PCI.血管内影像学指导或血管造影指导下的复杂 PCI。
N Engl J Med. 2023 May 4;388(18):1668-1679. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2216607. Epub 2023 Mar 5.
5
Plaque characteristics and slow flow during percutaneous coronary intervention of irregular protrusion by optical coherence tomography.光学相干断层扫描在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗不规则突出病变时的斑块特征及血流缓慢情况
Heart Vessels. 2019 Jul;34(7):1076-1085. doi: 10.1007/s00380-018-01335-4. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
6
Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): one-year angiographic and clinical results.光学相干断层成像与血管内超声在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的比较（OPINION 试验）：一年的血管造影和临床结果。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Nov 7;38(42):3139-3147. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx351.
7
Optical Frequency Domain Imaging Versus Intravascular Ultrasound in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (OPINION Trial): Results From the OPINION Imaging Study.光学频域成像与血管内超声在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的比较（OPINION 试验）：OPINION 成像研究结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jan;11(1):111-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.06.021. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
8
Optical Coherence Tomography Findings in Patients With Coronary Stent Thrombosis: A Report of the PRESTIGE Consortium (Prevention of Late Stent Thrombosis by an Interdisciplinary Global European Effort).冠状动脉支架血栓形成患者的光学相干断层扫描结果：PRESTIGE联盟（通过跨学科全球欧洲努力预防晚期支架血栓形成）报告
Circulation. 2017 Sep 12;136(11):1007-1021. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.026788. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
9
Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial.光学相干断层成像术与血管内超声和血管造影指导冠状动脉支架置入术的比较（ILUMIEN III：OPTIMIZE PCI）：一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2016 Nov 26;388(10060):2618-2628. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31922-5. Epub 2016 Oct 30.
10
Incidence and Clinical Significance of Poststent Optical Coherence Tomography Findings: One-Year Follow-Up Study From a Multicenter Registry.支架置入后光学相干断层扫描结果的发生率和临床意义：一项多中心注册研究的一年随访。
Circulation. 2015 Sep 15;132(11):1020-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.014704. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
Zotero 插件