• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较两种使用阴道内米索前列醇 25μg 的引产方案与不良围产结局。

Comparison of two labor induction regimens with intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg and adverse perinatal outcomes.

机构信息

Universidade de Uberaba, Mário Palmério University Hospital, Gynecology and Obstetrics Service - Uberaba (MG), Brazil.

Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Department of Obstetrics - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024 Aug 30;70(9):e20240286. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20240286. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1590/1806-9282.20240286
PMID:39230067
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11371128/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare two labor induction regimens (4 and 6 h), to determine predictors of successful labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg tablets, and to evaluate the association with adverse perinatal outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study that included singleton pregnancies undergoing induction of labor with an intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg tablet between 37 and 42 weeks of gestation. The pregnant women were divided into two groups: Group 1-intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg every 4 h and Group 2-intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg every 6 h.

RESULTS

Pregnant women were divided into Group 1 (n=289) and Group 2 (n=278). Group 1 had a higher median number of intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg tablets (3.0 vs. 2.0 tablets, p<0.001), a lower prevalence of postpartum hemorrhage (7.6 vs. 32.7%, p<0.001), and a higher need for oxytocin (odds ratio [OR]: 2.1, 95%CI: 1.47-2.98, p<0.001) than Group 2. Models including intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg tablets every 4 and 6 h [x2(1)=23.7, OR: 4.35, p<0.0001], parity [x2(3)=39.4, OR: 0.59, p=0.031], and Bishop's score [x2(4)=10.8, OR: 0.77, p=0.019] were the best predictors of failure of labor induction. A statistically significant difference between groups was observed between the use of the first intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg tablet at the beginning (Breslow p<0.001) and the end of the active labor phase (Long Hank p=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Pregnant women who used intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg every 4 h had a longer time from the labor induction to the beginning of the active phase of labor and higher rates of adverse perinatal outcomes than women who used intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg every 6 h.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较两种引产方案(4 小时和 6 小时),确定阴道内给予 25μg米索前列醇片引产成功的预测因素,并评估其与不良围产儿结局的关系。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了在 37 周至 42 周妊娠期间接受阴道内给予 25μg米索前列醇片引产的单胎妊娠孕妇。将孕妇分为两组:第 1 组(n=289)为阴道内给予 25μg米索前列醇片,每 4 小时 1 次;第 2 组(n=278)为阴道内给予 25μg米索前列醇片,每 6 小时 1 次。

结果

孕妇分为第 1 组(n=289)和第 2 组(n=278)。第 1 组阴道内给予 25μg米索前列醇片的中位数数量更高(3.0 片与 2.0 片,p<0.001),产后出血发生率更低(7.6%与 32.7%,p<0.001),需要催产素的比例更高(比值比[OR]:2.1,95%CI:1.47-2.98,p<0.001)。与第 2 组相比,第 1 组中使用 4 小时和 6 小时间隔阴道内给予 25μg米索前列醇片(x2(1)=23.7,OR:4.35,p<0.0001)、产次(x2(3)=39.4,OR:0.59,p=0.031)和 Bishop 评分(x2(4)=10.8,OR:0.77,p=0.019)是引产失败的最佳预测因素。在开始(Breslow p<0.001)和活跃分娩期(Long Hank p=0.002)结束时,两组之间使用第一片阴道内米索前列醇 25μg 之间的差异具有统计学意义。

结论

与每 6 小时阴道内给予 25μg米索前列醇片相比,每 4 小时阴道内给予 25μg米索前列醇片的孕妇从引产开始到活跃分娩期开始的时间更长,不良围产儿结局的发生率更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024e/11371128/081f54812a38/1806-9282-ramb-70-e20240286-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024e/11371128/081f54812a38/1806-9282-ramb-70-e20240286-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024e/11371128/081f54812a38/1806-9282-ramb-70-e20240286-gf01.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of two labor induction regimens with intravaginal misoprostol 25 μg and adverse perinatal outcomes.比较两种使用阴道内米索前列醇 25μg 的引产方案与不良围产结局。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024 Aug 30;70(9):e20240286. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20240286. eCollection 2024.
2
Evaluation of the efficacy of labor induction with vaginal misoprostol in a low-risk pregnant women population.评价低危孕妇人群中行阴道米索前列醇引产的疗效。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024 Jul 19;70(7):e20240132. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20240132. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparison of induction of labor with vaginal misoprostol plus oxytocin versus oxytocin alone in term primigravidae.足月初产妇中阴道用米索前列醇联合缩宫素与单用缩宫素引产的比较。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Sep;24(9):1084-7. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2010.531798. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
4
Induction of labor with misoprostol in pregnancies with advanced maternal age.米索前列醇用于高龄孕妇引产。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Dec;129(2):140-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.11.040. Epub 2006 Jan 6.
5
Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.足月引产时阴道用米索前列醇与地诺前列酮阴道栓剂的疗效及安全性比较:一项随机试验
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Jul;280(1):19-24. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0843-9. Epub 2008 Nov 26.
6
Titrated oral misoprostol solution versus vaginal misoprostol for labor induction.滴定口服米索前列醇溶液与阴道米索前列醇用于引产的比较
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Dec;123(3):207-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.06.028. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
7
Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study.米索前列醇阴道栓剂与米索前列醇阴道片用于引产的队列研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 May 10;18(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1788-z.
8
Intravaginal Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction in Nulliparous Women: A Double-blinded, Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.米索前列醇阴道给药用于未产妇宫颈成熟和引产:一项双盲、前瞻性随机对照研究。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2015 Oct 20;128(20):2736-42. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.167299.
9
Maternal and neonatal outcome of labour induction at term comparing two regimens of misoprostol.足月引产使用两种米索前列醇方案的母婴结局比较
J Perinat Med. 2014 Sep;42(5):603-9. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2013-0215.
10
Comparison of labor induction with misoprostol vs. oxytocin/prostaglandin E2 in term pregnancy.足月妊娠中米索前列醇与缩宫素/前列腺素E2引产的比较。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1996 Nov;55(2):99-104. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(96)02710-5.

本文引用的文献

1
FIGO good practice recommendations for induced or spontaneous labor at term: Prep-for-Labor triage to minimize risks and maximize favorable outcomes.FIGO 足月引产或自发分娩的最佳实践建议:产前分类以最小化风险并最大化有利结局。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023 Oct;163 Suppl 2:51-56. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15114.
2
Failed induction of labor.引产失败。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar;230(3S):S769-S774. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.103. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
3
Labor Induction with Intravaginal Misoprostol versus Spontaneous Labor: Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes.
经阴道给予米索前列醇引产与自然分娩:母婴结局。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Dec 9;2022:2826927. doi: 10.1155/2022/2826927. eCollection 2022.
4
Pre-induction cervical ripening with different initial doses of intravaginal misoprostol: time to delivery and peri-natal outcomes.不同起始剂量米索前列醇经阴道给药用于引产的宫颈成熟效果:分娩时间和围产结局。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jul;42(5):1112-1116. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.2006161. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
5
Misoprostol for labour induction.米索前列醇用于引产。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Nov;77:53-63. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.09.003. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
6
National Partnership for Maternal Safety: Consensus Bundle on Safe Reduction of Primary Cesarean Births-Supporting Intended Vaginal Births.美国母婴安全国家合作伙伴组织:关于安全减少初次剖宫产术以支持阴道分娩的共识捆绑包。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;131(3):503-513. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002471.
7
Labor Induction Techniques: Which Is the Best?分娩诱导技术:哪种方法最好?
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017 Dec;44(4):567-582. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2017.08.011.
8
Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings.门诊环境中引产的药物和机械干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 13;9(9):CD007701. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007701.pub3.
9
FIGO's updated recommendations for misoprostol used alone in gynecology and obstetrics.国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)关于米索前列醇单独用于妇产科的最新建议。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Sep;138(3):363-366. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12181. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
10
Failed induction of labor.引产失败。
Semin Perinatol. 2015 Oct;39(6):483-7. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2015.07.013. Epub 2015 Sep 2.