Taha Hosam I, Elgendy Mohamed S, Ezz Mohamed R, Tolba Khalid, El Safty Mahmoud, Azzawi Mohammad Al Diab Al, Katamesh Basant E, Albazee Ebraheem
Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Faculty of Medicine, National Ribat University, Khartoum, Sudan.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Feb;282(2):597-610. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08937-x. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of septoplasty versus non-surgical management for patients experiencing nasal obstruction due to deviated nasal septum (DNS).
We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrials.gov, ICTRP, and ISRCTN for relevant RCTs. The primary outcomes included the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale, Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF), surgical complications, and quality of life. Data were synthesized using RevMan 5.4 and STATA 18, with effect estimates presented as mean differences (MD) or risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024538373).
Our search identified 537 studies, of which 3 RCTs involving 721 participants met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed that septoplasty significantly improved NOSE and SNOT-22 scores compared to non-surgical interventions at 6 and 12 months of follow-up, despite no notable differences at 3 months post-treatment. No significant difference was observed regarding nasal flow assessed by PNIF. The rate of complications was low, ranging from 0.31% (revision rate) to 4.12% (bleeding and infection rates). Additionally, our qualitative synthesis showed an improvement in the quality of life at 6 and 12 months in the septoplasty group compared with the non-surgical group.
This systematic review and meta-analysis of 721 patients revealed the efficacy of septoplasty, with or without turbinate surgery, in improving nasal obstruction symptoms at 6 and 12 months. Additionally, septoplasty consists of a relatively low rate of complications such as bleeding, infection, and septal perforation. Furthermore, a low revision rate was found. Septoplasty improved the quality of life, especially after 6 and 12 months. However, our findings should be interpreted with caution, and further research is needed to consolidate our results.
本项对随机对照试验(RCT)的系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估鼻中隔成形术与非手术治疗对鼻中隔偏曲(DNS)所致鼻塞患者的疗效和安全性。
我们对PubMed、Scopus、Embase、科学网、Cochrane图书馆、Clinicaltrials.gov、ICTRP和ISRCTN进行了全面检索,以查找相关的随机对照试验。主要结局包括鼻阻塞症状评估(NOSE)量表、鼻-鼻窦结局测试(SNOT-22)、最大鼻吸气流量(PNIF)、手术并发症和生活质量。使用RevMan 5.4和STATA 18对数据进行综合分析,效应估计值以平均差(MD)或风险比(RR)及95%置信区间(CI)表示。研究方案已在PROSPERO注册(注册号:CRD42024538373)。
我们的检索共识别出537项研究,其中3项随机对照试验涉及721名参与者,符合纳入标准。荟萃分析显示,在随访6个月和12个月时,与非手术干预相比,鼻中隔成形术显著改善了NOSE和SNOT-22评分,尽管治疗后3个月时无显著差异。通过PNIF评估的鼻气流方面未观察到显著差异。并发症发生率较低,范围从0.31%(翻修率)到4.12%(出血和感染率)。此外,我们的定性综合分析表明,与非手术组相比,鼻中隔成形术组在6个月和12个月时生活质量有所改善。
这项对721例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析揭示了鼻中隔成形术(无论是否联合鼻甲手术)在改善6个月和12个月时鼻阻塞症状方面的疗效。此外,鼻中隔成形术的出血、感染和鼻中隔穿孔等并发症发生率相对较低。此外,翻修率也较低。鼻中隔成形术改善了生活质量,尤其是在6个月和12个月之后。然而,我们的研究结果应谨慎解读,需要进一步研究来巩固我们的结果。