Windeck Henning, Berger Fabian, Sauer Joachim
Institut für Chemie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin, Germany.
Department of Physical and Macromolecular Chemistry and Charles University Centre of Advanced Materials, Charles University, 12843 Prague, Czech Republic.
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2024 Sep 18;26(36):23588-23599. doi: 10.1039/d4cp02851a.
We investigate the adsorption of water molecules in the zeolite H-MFI at isolated Brønsted acid sites (BAS) for loadings of 1, 2, and 3 HO/BAS. We consider two approaches to the OAl-O(H)-Si sites: the Brønsted-type approach of HO to the acidic proton and the Lewis-type approach to the aluminium atom of the AlO tetrahedron. From the twelve crystallographically inequivalent framework sites for Al, a representative set of six active site positions is chosen. For them, we calculate CCSD(T)-quality adsorption energies at MP2-quality adsorption structures for different approaches, 48 in total. The Brønsted-type approach is favoured for most cases but the Lewis-type approach has similar stability for some framework positions. We predict heats of adsorption per molecule ranging from 60 to 76, 56 to 65, and 56 to 64 kJ mol for loadings of 1, 2, and 3 HO/BAS, respectively. For 1 HO/BAS, the experimental result (70 kJ mol) falls into the range of our predictions, whereas for 2 and 3 HO/BAS, the measured adsorption heats per molecule (74 and 70 kJ mol, respectively) are larger than our predictions. For 2 HO/BAS, the ion-pair structure generated by proton transfer to the water dimer competes with the neutral adsorption complex. The DFT adsorption energies (PBE+D2) deviate significantly from the CCSD(T)-quality reference energies, by up to 25 kJ mol for 1 HO/BAS, 25 kJ mol per HO for 2 HO/BAS, and 18 kJ mol per HO for 3 HO/BAS. Specifically, PBE+D2 overstabilises the ion-pair structure, in many cases the PBE+D2 error is much larger for ionic than for neutral adsorption structures.
我们研究了在孤立的布朗斯台德酸位点(BAS)上,负载量为1、2和3个HO/BAS时,水分子在沸石H-MFI中的吸附情况。我们考虑了两种处理OAl-O(H)-Si位点的方法:HO与酸性质子的布朗斯台德型方法,以及与AlO四面体铝原子的路易斯型方法。从Al的12个晶体学不等价骨架位点中,选择了一组具有代表性的6个活性位点位置。对于这些位点,我们在不同方法的MP2质量吸附结构下计算了CCSD(T)质量的吸附能,总共48个。在大多数情况下,布朗斯台德型方法更受青睐,但路易斯型方法在某些骨架位置具有相似的稳定性。我们预测,对于负载量为1、2和3个HO/BAS,每分子的吸附热分别为60至76、56至65和56至64 kJ/mol。对于1个HO/BAS,实验结果(70 kJ/mol)落在我们的预测范围内,而对于2和3个HO/BAS,每分子测量的吸附热(分别为74和70 kJ/mol)大于我们的预测值。对于2个HO/BAS,质子转移到水二聚体产生的离子对结构与中性吸附络合物相互竞争。DFT吸附能(PBE+D2)与CCSD(T)质量的参考能有显著偏差,对于1个HO/BAS偏差高达25 kJ/mol,对于2个HO/BAS每个HO偏差25 kJ/mol,对于3个HO/BAS每个HO偏差18 kJ/mol。具体而言,PBE+D2使离子对结构过度稳定,在许多情况下,离子吸附结构的PBE+D2误差比中性吸附结构大得多。