• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习算法与列线图构建在 2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病视网膜病变预测中的比较。

Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms and Nomogram Construction for Diabetic Retinopathy Prediction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients.

机构信息

South Campus Outpatient Clinic, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Ophthalmology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Res. 2024;67(1):537-548. doi: 10.1159/000541294. Epub 2024 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1159/000541294
PMID:39231456
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare various machine learning algorithms for constructing a diabetic retinopathy (DR) prediction model among type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients and to develop a nomogram based on the best model.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included DM patients receiving routine DR screening. Patients were randomly divided into training (244) and validation (105) sets. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was used for the selection of clinical characteristics. Six machine learning algorithms were compared: decision tree (DT), k-nearest neighbours (KNN), logistic regression model (LM), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and XGBoost (XGB). Model performance was assessed via receiver-operating characteristic (ROC), calibration, and decision curve analyses (DCAs). A nomogram was then developed on the basis of the best model.

RESULTS

Compared with the five other machine learning algorithms (DT, KNN, RF, SVM, and XGB), the LM demonstrated the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC, 0.894) and recall (0.92) in the validation set. Additionally, the calibration curves and DCA results were relatively favourable. Disease duration, DPN, insulin dosage, urinary protein, and ALB were included in the LM. The nomogram exhibited robust discrimination (AUC: 0.856 in the training set and 0.868 in the validation set), calibration, and clinical applicability across the two datasets after 1,000 bootstraps.

CONCLUSION

Among the six different machine learning algorithms, the LM algorithm demonstrated the best performance. A logistic regression-based nomogram for predicting DR in type 2 DM patients was established. This nomogram may serve as a valuable tool for DR detection, facilitating timely treatment.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在比较各种机器学习算法在 2 型糖尿病患者中构建糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)预测模型,并基于最佳模型开发列线图。

方法

这是一项横断面研究,纳入了接受常规 DR 筛查的 2 型糖尿病患者。患者被随机分为训练集(244 例)和验证集(105 例)。使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归选择临床特征。比较了 6 种机器学习算法:决策树(DT)、k 近邻(KNN)、逻辑回归模型(LM)、随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)和 XGBoost(XGB)。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)、校准和决策曲线分析(DCAs)评估模型性能。然后基于最佳模型开发列线图。

结果

与其他 5 种机器学习算法(DT、KNN、RF、SVM 和 XGB)相比,LM 在验证集中表现出最高的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC,0.894)和召回率(0.92)。此外,校准曲线和 DCA 结果也相对较好。纳入模型的临床特征有病程、DPN、胰岛素剂量、尿蛋白和 ALB。在经过 1000 次自举后,该列线图在两个数据集的训练集和验证集的区分度(AUC:0.856 和 0.868)、校准和临床适用性均表现稳健。

结论

在 6 种不同的机器学习算法中,LM 算法表现最佳。建立了基于逻辑回归的 2 型糖尿病患者 DR 预测列线图。该列线图可能成为 DR 检测的有用工具,有助于及时治疗。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms and Nomogram Construction for Diabetic Retinopathy Prediction in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients.机器学习算法与列线图构建在 2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病视网膜病变预测中的比较。
Ophthalmic Res. 2024;67(1):537-548. doi: 10.1159/000541294. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
2
[Constructing a predictive model for the death risk of patients with septic shock based on supervised machine learning algorithms].基于监督机器学习算法构建脓毒症休克患者死亡风险预测模型
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Apr;36(4):345-352. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20230930-00832.
3
Construction and evaluation of a mortality prediction model for patients with acute kidney injury undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy based on machine learning algorithms.基于机器学习算法的行连续性肾脏替代治疗的急性肾损伤患者死亡率预测模型的构建与评估。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2388709. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2388709. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
4
Prediction of diabetic retinopathy among type 2 diabetic patients in University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, 2006-2021: A prognostic model.2006-2021 年,贡德尔大学综合专科医院 2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病视网膜病变的预测:预后模型。
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Oct;190:105536. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105536. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
5
Development and validation of a predictive risk model based on retinal geometry for an early assessment of diabetic retinopathy.基于视网膜几何形状的糖尿病视网膜病变早期评估预测风险模型的建立与验证。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Nov 21;13:1033611. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1033611. eCollection 2022.
6
Nomogram for prediction of diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A retrospective study.预测 2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病视网膜病变的列线图:一项回顾性研究。
J Diabetes Complications. 2022 Nov;36(11):108313. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2022.108313. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
7
Development and external validation of a predictive model for type 2 diabetic retinopathy.开发并验证用于预测 2 型糖尿病视网膜病变的模型。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 20;14(1):16741. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67533-5.
8
Predicting diabetic retinopathy and identifying interpretable biomedical features using machine learning algorithms.利用机器学习算法预测糖尿病视网膜病变并识别可解释的生物医学特征。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2018 Aug 13;19(Suppl 9):283. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2277-0.
9
Application of machine learning model in predicting the likelihood of blood transfusion after hip fracture surgery.机器学习模型在预测髋部骨折手术后输血可能性中的应用。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Nov;35(11):2643-2656. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02550-4. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
10
Prediction of additional hospital days in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery with machine learning methods.运用机器学习方法预测行颈椎手术患者的额外住院天数。
Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon). 2024 Dec;29(1):2345066. doi: 10.1080/24699322.2024.2345066. Epub 2024 Jun 11.