Syed Ali Shafeeq Ahmed, Ilankoon I M S K, Zhang Lian, Tan Jully
Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway, Selangor Darul Ehsan 47500, Malaysia; Waste and Critical Metals Sustainability Research Group, School of Engineering, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway, Selangor Darul Ehsan 47500, Malaysia.
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia.
J Hazard Mater. 2024 Nov 5;479:135554. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.135554. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
Achieving circularity in the plastic economy predominantly depends on sourcing higher quality recyclates. Packaging plastic poses a significant challenge as it is often not prioritised for collection or recycling initiatives. The presence of additives, such as printing ink, impedes the quality of recyclates. Considering the volume of packaging plastics and the importance of branding (aesthetics and consumer information), ink removal is a critical pre-treatment step. However, the literature is limited, with only 14 studies exploring de-inking processes. Drawing parallels with the detergent laundering process, surfactants have been widely investigated in plastic de-inking, with cationic surfactants proving the most effective with a de-inking efficiency of up to 100%. However, concerns exist regarding the toxic and hazardous nature of the surfactants and chemicals. The average hazard quotient (AHQ) was developed, which compares de-inking chemicals as one of the key findings. AHQ provides a quantitative proxy for the hazards and toxicities, which are qualitatively presented as part of the globally harmonised system (GHS) classification of chemicals. To drive emerging packaging plastic de-inking, including the development of green surfactants (e.g. gamma-valerolactone), this work enables an informed chemical selection minimising potential hazards (rather than creating more adverse effects in plastic recycling processes) and toxicities from plastic waste, fulfilling the objectives of cleaner plastic waste recycling.
在塑料经济中实现循环利用主要取决于获取更高质量的回收材料。包装塑料带来了重大挑战,因为它在收集或回收倡议中往往未被列为优先事项。添加剂(如印刷油墨)的存在会降低回收材料的质量。考虑到包装塑料的数量以及品牌塑造的重要性(美学和消费者信息),油墨去除是关键的预处理步骤。然而,相关文献有限,仅有14项研究探讨了脱墨工艺。与洗涤剂洗涤过程相类比,表面活性剂在塑料脱墨方面得到了广泛研究,其中阳离子表面活性剂被证明效果最为显著,脱墨效率高达100%。然而,人们对表面活性剂和化学品的毒性及危害性存在担忧。研究得出了平均危害商数(AHQ),将脱墨化学品进行比较是关键发现之一。AHQ为危害和毒性提供了一个定量指标,这些危害和毒性在全球化学品统一分类制度(GHS)对化学品的分类中以定性方式呈现。为推动新兴的包装塑料脱墨,包括绿色表面活性剂(如γ-戊内酯)的开发,这项工作有助于进行明智的化学品选择,最大限度地减少潜在危害(而非在塑料回收过程中造成更多不利影响)以及塑料废物的毒性,实现更清洁的塑料废物回收目标。