• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过“先手术”方法减少小儿胆石病的 MRCP 利用率:CARES 工作组回顾性研究。

Reducing MRCP Utilization Through a "Surgery First" Approach for Pediatric Choledocholithiasis: A CARES Working Group Retrospective Study.

机构信息

Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, USA.

Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Dec;59(12):161668. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.08.008. Epub 2024 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.08.008
PMID:39232947
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Choledocholithiasis in children is rising and frequently managed with an endoscopy-first (EF) approach that utilizes endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is a resource intensive modality that often precedes ERCP to gain further assurance of choledocholithiasis prior to intervention. MRCP can lead to a longer length of stay (LOS) and strain healthcare resources. We hypothesized that the use of MRCP is decreased with a surgery-first (SF) approach.

METHODS

The Choledocholithiasis Alliance for Research, Education, and Surgery (CARES) Working Group conducted this retrospective study on pediatric patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. SF patients underwent LC + intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) ± laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). Imaging studies included ultrasound (US), MRCP, and computed tomography (CT).

RESULTS

From seven institutions, 357 pediatric patients were identified. The SF (n = 220) group received fewer imaging studies then EF (n = 137) (1.29 vs. 1.62; p < 0.05). US was more commonly employed and the number of US and CT scans was similar. The SF group had lower MRCP utilization than EF (29% vs. 59%; p < 0.05). EF patients that received an MRCP had the longest LOS (4.0 d [2.4, 6.3]) compared to SF that did not (1.9 d [1.2, 3.2]) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Children with choledocholithiasis managed with an EF approach receive more diagnostic imaging, especially MRCP. While MRCP remains a powerful diagnostic tool, a surgery-first approach can minimize the resource utilization and LOS associated with magnetic resonance imaging.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

摘要

背景

儿童胆石症的发病率正在上升,通常采用内镜优先(EF)的方法进行治疗,该方法首先进行内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP),然后进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)。磁共振胰胆管成像(MRCP)是一种资源密集型的方式,通常在 ERCP 之前进行,以在干预之前进一步确定是否存在胆总管结石。MRCP 可能导致住院时间(LOS)延长和医疗资源紧张。我们假设采用手术优先(SF)的方法可以减少 MRCP 的使用。

方法

胆石症研究、教育和手术联盟(CARES)工作组对疑似胆石症的儿科患者进行了这项回顾性研究。SF 患者接受 LC+术中胆管造影(IOC)±腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)。影像学检查包括超声(US)、MRCP 和计算机断层扫描(CT)。

结果

从 7 家机构中确定了 357 名儿科患者。SF(n=220)组接受的影像学检查少于 EF(n=137)组(1.29 比 1.62;p<0.05)。更常使用 US,US 和 CT 扫描的数量相似。SF 组的 MRCP 使用率低于 EF 组(29%比 59%;p<0.05)。接受 MRCP 的 EF 患者的 LOS 最长(4.0 天[2.4,6.3]),而未接受 MRCP 的 SF 患者的 LOS 最短(1.9 天[1.2,3.2])(p<0.05)。

结论

采用 EF 方法治疗的胆石症儿童接受了更多的诊断性影像学检查,尤其是 MRCP。虽然 MRCP 仍然是一种强大的诊断工具,但采用手术优先的方法可以最小化与磁共振成像相关的资源利用和 LOS。

证据水平

III 级。

相似文献

1
Reducing MRCP Utilization Through a "Surgery First" Approach for Pediatric Choledocholithiasis: A CARES Working Group Retrospective Study.通过“先手术”方法减少小儿胆石病的 MRCP 利用率:CARES 工作组回顾性研究。
J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Dec;59(12):161668. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.08.008. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
2
"Surgery First" vs. "Endoscopy First" for Pediatric Choledocholithiasis Presenting at the End of the Week - A CARES Working Group Study.周末就诊的小儿胆总管结石采用“先手术”与“先内镜治疗”的对比——CARES工作组研究
J Pediatr Surg. 2025 Jan;60(1):161959. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161959. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
3
A Comparative Analysis of "Surgery First" vs. "Endoscopy First" for Pediatric Choledocholithiasis Presenting at the End of the Week.“先手术”与“先内镜”治疗周末就诊的小儿胆总管结石的对比分析。
Am Surg. 2024 Sep;90(9):2206-2211. doi: 10.1177/00031348241241728. Epub 2024 May 4.
4
Utility of MRCP in clinical decision making of suspected choledocholithiasis: An institutional analysis and literature review.磁共振胰胆管造影术在疑似胆总管结石临床决策中的应用:一项机构分析及文献综述
Am J Surg. 2017 Aug;214(2):251-255. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.10.025. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
5
Initial Cholecystectomy with Cholangiography Decreases Length of Stay Compared to Preoperative MRCP or ERCP in the Management of Choledocholithiasis.与术前磁共振胰胆管造影(MRCP)或内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)相比,初次胆囊切除术联合胆管造影可缩短胆总管结石治疗中的住院时间。
Am Surg. 2015 Jul;81(7):726-31.
6
Patient Safety and Radiation Exposure in Transcystic Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration: A CARES Working Group Multicenter Study.经胆囊管腹腔镜胆总管探查术的患者安全与辐射暴露:CARES 工作组多中心研究。
J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Dec;59(12):161669. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.08.009. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
7
Transcystic Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for Pediatric Patients with Choledocholithiasis: A Multi-Center Study.小儿胆总管结石经胆囊腹腔镜胆总管探查术:一项多中心研究
J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Mar;59(3):389-392. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.10.046. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
8
Management of Choledocholithiasis in a Community Hospital: Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Versus Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.社区医院胆总管结石的处理:腹腔镜胆总管探查术与内镜逆行胰胆管造影术。
Am Surg. 2024 Aug;90(8):2011-2013. doi: 10.1177/00031348241241626. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
9
Pediatric Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration: An Opportunity to Decrease ERCP Complications.小儿腹腔镜胆总管探查术:降低 ERCP 并发症的机会。
J Surg Res. 2019 Oct;242:318-322. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.072. Epub 2019 May 23.
10
Single-step treatment of gall bladder and bile duct stones: a combined endoscopic-laparoscopic technique.胆囊和胆管结石的单步治疗:一种内镜-腹腔镜联合技术。
Int J Surg. 2009 Aug;7(4):338-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 May 27.