Saad Berreta Rodrigo, Knapik Derrick M, Lawand Jad, Moews Logan, Villarreal-Espinosa Juan Bernardo, Pallone Lucas, Dave Udit, Spaan Jonathan, Rafael Garcia José, Ayala Salvador, Verma Nikhil N, Chahla Jorge
Department of Orthopaedics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Rush University Medical College, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Arthroscopy. 2025 Jun;41(6):2146-2162. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.008. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
To systematically review the contemporary literature and evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), functional knee measures, and the incidence of complications in patients aged 50 years and older undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) at short- to mid-term follow-up.
A literature search was conducted across the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases, spanning from database inception to November 2023, in accordance with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The inclusion criteria consisted of clinical studies reporting PROMs, measures of knee stability, and complication rates after ACLR in patients aged 50 years and older with minimum 2-year follow-up. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies criteria were used to assess study quality. Primary outcome measures consisted of changes in PROMs and complication rates after ACLR.
A total of 17 studies, consisting of 1,163 patients undergoing ACLR, were identified. Autografts were used in 90.3% of patients, whereas 9.7% of patients were treated using allografts. At minimum 24-month follow-up, mean International Knee Documentation Committee scores ranged from 67.4 to 92.96; mean Lysholm scores, from 84.4 to 94.8; and mean Tegner scores, from 0.3 to 5.4. The mean side-to-side difference at final follow-up ranged from 1.2 to 2.4 mm, and the rates of recurrent instability ranged from 0% to 18%. Complication and revision rates ranged from 0% to 40.4% and 0% to 37.5%, respectively, with the highest rates observed in studies noting a high incidence of intraoperative cartilage lesions.
ACLR in patients aged 50 years and older results in favorable International Knee Documentation Committee scores, Lysholm scores, and Tegner activity scores and improvements in functional knee measures. However, a wide range of reoperations and complications are reported, attributed to varying levels of chondral injury and osteoarthritis, which warrant consideration when discussing expectations in patients aged 50 years and older undergoing ACLR.
Level IV, systematic review of Level II to IV studies.
系统回顾当代文献,评估50岁及以上患者接受前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后短期至中期随访时患者报告的结局指标(PROMs)、膝关节功能指标以及并发症的发生率。
根据2020年系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南,在PubMed、Embase和Scopus数据库中进行文献检索,检索时间跨度从数据库建立至2023年11月。纳入标准包括报告50岁及以上患者ACLR后PROMs、膝关节稳定性指标和并发症发生率的临床研究,且随访时间至少为2年。使用非随机研究的方法学指标标准评估研究质量。主要结局指标包括ACLR后PROMs的变化和并发症发生率。
共纳入17项研究,涉及1163例接受ACLR的患者。90.3%的患者使用自体移植物,9.7%的患者使用异体移植物。在至少24个月的随访中,国际膝关节文献委员会(International Knee Documentation Committee)平均评分范围为67.4至92.96;Lysholm平均评分范围为84.4至94.8;Tegner平均评分范围为0.3至5.4。最终随访时的平均双侧差异范围为1.2至2.4毫米,复发性不稳定发生率范围为0%至18%。并发症和翻修率分别为0%至40.4%和0%至37.5%,在术中软骨损伤发生率高的研究中观察到的发生率最高。
50岁及以上患者接受ACLR后,国际膝关节文献委员会评分、Lysholm评分和Tegner活动评分良好,膝关节功能指标有所改善。然而,报告了广泛的再次手术和并发症,这归因于不同程度的软骨损伤和骨关节炎,在讨论50岁及以上接受ACLR患者的预期时需要考虑这些因素。
IV级,对II级至IV级研究的系统评价。