• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无症状受试者中椎间盘与椎体对腰椎前凸的作用

Disc Versus Vertebral Body Contribution to Lumbar Lordosis in Asymptomatic Subjects.

作者信息

Khalifé Marc, Lafage Renaud, Ferrero Emmanuelle, Elysée Jonathan, Assi Ayman, Gille Olivier, Finoco Mikael, Skalli Wafa, Guigui Pierre, Vergari Claudio, Lafage Virginie

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.

Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Aug 1;50(15):1074-1080. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005152. Epub 2024 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005152
PMID:39233593
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study of a multicentric prospective database.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the relative contribution of vertebral bodies versus discs to lumbar lordosis and its variation with age and pelvic incidence.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

While studies sought to determine the physiological magnitude and distribution of lumbar lordosis, data regarding its anatomical composition is lacking.

METHODS

This study included healthy volunteers with full-body stereoradiographs in free-standing position, without lumbosacral transitional vertebra, or age under 18. The following parameters were analyzed: age, sex, pelvic incidence (PI), and lumbar lordosis (LL). Posterior heights and sagittal Cobb angles between the upper and lower endplate for each lumbar disc and each vertebral body were measured from L1 to S1. Ratios of contribution to LL were calculated for each disc and vertebral body. The cohort was divided into four age groups and four PI groups.

RESULTS

Six hundred forty-five subjects were included, mean age was 37.6±16.3, 51% of females. There was a significant decrease in total lumbar disc lordosis with age (-48.9±9.7° to -42.9±10.2°), occurring in lower LL. Vertebral bodies were significantly more kyphotic in Seniors than Youngs (-8.9±8.4° vs. -5.0±9.4°, P=0.03 ), driven by a significant increase in kyphosis of L1 and L2 bodies. Vertebral body contribution to LL significantly increased between groups as PI increased, from a median of 8.0% to 20.5% ( P<0.001 ). This decrease in disc contribution in favor of vertebral bodies mainly took place in lower LL.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the importance of vertebral contribution to lumbar lordosis, ranging from 8% to 21% among PI groups. Lumbar lordosis decreased with aging through decreased disc lordosis in the lower lumbar spine and increased body kyphosis in the upper lumbar spine. These results may help surgeons in the assessment of sagittal alignment and the selection of operative technique to achieve surgical correction.

摘要

研究设计

对一个多中心前瞻性数据库的回顾性研究。

目的

本研究旨在描述椎体与椎间盘对腰椎前凸的相对贡献及其随年龄和骨盆入射角的变化。

背景数据总结

虽然已有研究试图确定腰椎前凸的生理大小和分布,但缺乏关于其解剖结构组成的数据。

方法

本研究纳入了在站立位进行全身立体放射摄影的健康志愿者,排除腰骶部移行椎或年龄在18岁以下者。分析以下参数:年龄、性别、骨盆入射角(PI)和腰椎前凸(LL)。从L1至S1测量每个腰椎间盘和每个椎体上下终板之间的后缘高度和矢状面Cobb角。计算每个椎间盘和椎体对LL的贡献比例。将队列分为四个年龄组和四个PI组。

结果

纳入645名受试者,平均年龄37.6±16.3岁,女性占51%。随着年龄增长,腰椎间盘总前凸显著降低(从-48.9±9.7°降至-42.9±10.2°),出现在较低的LL节段。老年人椎体的后凸明显大于年轻人(-8.9±8.4°对-5.0±9.4°,P=0.03),主要由L1和L2椎体后凸显著增加所致。随着PI增加,椎体对LL的贡献在组间显著增加,从中位数8.0%增至20.5%(P<0.001)。椎间盘贡献减少而椎体贡献增加主要发生在较低的LL节段。

结论

本研究强调了椎体对腰椎前凸贡献的重要性,在PI组中占8%至21%。腰椎前凸随年龄增长而降低,原因是下腰椎间盘前凸减少和上腰椎椎体后凸增加。这些结果可能有助于外科医生评估矢状面排列并选择手术技术以实现手术矫正。

相似文献

1
Disc Versus Vertebral Body Contribution to Lumbar Lordosis in Asymptomatic Subjects.无症状受试者中椎间盘与椎体对腰椎前凸的作用
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Aug 1;50(15):1074-1080. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005152. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
2
The Implications of Sacralized Transitional Vertebra on Spinal Alignment.骶化过渡椎对脊柱排列的影响
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Aug 1;50(15):1081-1089. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005187. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
3
The effect of degenerative scolioisis on segmental thoracolumbar sagittal alignment compared to age- and pelvic incidence-matched reference values.与年龄和骨盆倾斜度匹配的参考值相比,退行性脊柱侧弯对胸腰段节段矢状面排列的影响。
Eur Spine J. 2025 Feb;34(2):764-772. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08618-7. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
4
Evolution of Sagittal Spinal Alignment During Pubertal Growth: A Large-Scale Study in a Chinese Pediatric Population.青春期生长过程中矢状面脊柱排列的演变:一项针对中国儿童人群的大规模研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2025 Mar 19;107(6):e16. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00829. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
5
Does Periacetabular Osteotomy Change Sagittal Spinopelvic Alignment?髋臼周围截骨术是否改变矢状位脊柱骨盆排列?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1659-1667. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003031. Epub 2024 Apr 2.
6
The influence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures on global sagittal alignment in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者矢状位平衡的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Jul;32(7):2580-2587. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07780-8. Epub 2023 May 24.
7
Does kyphoplasty affect the global sagittal alignment in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures? A systematic review and meta-analysis.椎体后凸成形术对骨质疏松性椎体骨折患者的整体矢状面排列有影响吗?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Jan;32(1):38-45. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07479-2. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
8
How Does Radiographic Acetabular Morphology Change Between the Supine and Standing Positions in Asymptomatic Volunteers?无症状志愿者仰卧位和站立位时髋臼的放射学形态变化如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1550-1561. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003073. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
9
The impact of lower thoracic versus upper lumbar upper instrumented vertebra in minimally invasive correction of adult spinal deformity.下胸椎与上腰椎作为上固定椎在成人脊柱畸形微创矫正中的影响。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2025 Jan 10;42(4):462-469. doi: 10.3171/2024.8.SPINE231335. Print 2025 Apr 1.
10
Validation of Sagittal Age-adjusted Score in Predicting Proximal Junctional Kyphosis/Failure and Clinical Outcomes Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.矢状面年龄校正评分在预测成人脊柱畸形手术后近端交界性后凸/失败及临床结果中的验证
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Jul 15;50(14):948-955. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005144. Epub 2024 Sep 5.