Suppr超能文献

经皮胆囊引流术后早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗合并心肺疾病的II级急性胆囊炎TG18患者

Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, after Percutaneous Gall Bladder Drainage, for Grade II Acute Cholecystitis TG18 in Patients with Concomitant Cardiopulmonary Disease.

作者信息

Wael Mohamed, Seif Mostafa, Mourad Mohamed, Altabbaa Hashem, Ibrahim Ibrahim Mabrouk, Elkeleny Mostafa Refaie

机构信息

Liver and GIT unit, Alexandria University Main Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt.

Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2024 Dec;34(12):1069-1078. doi: 10.1089/lap.2024.0233. Epub 2024 Sep 5.

Abstract

The advancement in medical care has led to an increase in patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) and cardiopulmonary comorbidities referred for surgery. Grade II AC, according to Tokyo Guidelines in 2018 (TG18), is characterized by severe local inflammation with no systemic affection. The optimal treatment for patients with high-risk grade II AC has not yet been clearly established, which is still a dilemma. For these patients, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), despite being the only definitive treatment, is still a challenge. The introduction of percutaneous cholecystostomy as a temporary minimally invasive alternative technique allows an immediate gallbladder decompression with a rapid clinical improvement. However, the next step after percutaneous transhepatic gall bladder drainage (PTGBD) in these high-risk patients is still a debate, with no definitive consensus about the ideal treatment of choice as well as its optimal timing. In our study, we followed a treatment algorithm for high-risk patients that involved early gallbladder decompression by PTGBD, followed by LC at different intervals once the patient is considered fit for surgery. A retrospective study of 58 patients with high-risk grade II AC with cardiopulmonary comorbidity from our medical records was included. They were managed initially with PTGBD, an LC was then performed either within 7 days after drain insertion (early group, 26 patients), while an LC was performed later for the remaining patients within 6-8 weeks after PTGBD (late group, 32 patients). The results of the two groups were analyzed. Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein were significantly higher in the late group. No significant difference was found between both groups with regard to operative time, PTGBD-related complications, and major perioperative complications. Timing after PTGBD did not affect the incidence of operative complications. Total hospital stay was significantly shorter in the early group. PTGBD is a safe initial intervention for high-risk patients with AC with a low morbidity and high success rate. Urgent LC after PTGBD can be performed safely for well-selected high-risk patients with the timing of surgery is personalized according to each patient's clinical situation. Early LC (after PTGBD) has the advantage of shorter hospital stay, low cost, as well as avoiding the risk of biliary complications and mortality if waiting a delayed surgery with no significant difference in morbidity compared with late LC.

摘要

医疗护理的进步导致因急性胆囊炎(AC)和心肺合并症而接受手术治疗的患者增多。根据2018年东京指南(TG18),II级AC的特征是局部炎症严重但无全身影响。对于高危II级AC患者的最佳治疗方法尚未明确确立,这仍然是一个难题。对于这些患者,腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)尽管是唯一的确定性治疗方法,但仍然是一项挑战。经皮胆囊造瘘术作为一种临时的微创替代技术的引入,可实现胆囊立即减压并使临床症状迅速改善。然而,这些高危患者在经皮经肝胆管胆囊引流术(PTGBD)后的下一步治疗仍存在争议,对于理想的治疗选择及其最佳时机尚无明确共识。在我们的研究中,我们遵循了一种针对高危患者的治疗方案,该方案包括通过PTGBD进行早期胆囊减压,一旦患者被认为适合手术,再在不同间隔时间进行LC。我们纳入了一项对58例患有高危II级AC且合并心肺疾病的患者的回顾性研究。他们最初接受PTGBD治疗,然后在引流管插入后7天内进行LC(早期组,26例患者),而其余患者在PTGBD后6 - 8周内进行LC(晚期组,32例患者)。分析了两组的结果。晚期组的降钙素原和C反应蛋白明显更高。两组在手术时间、PTGBD相关并发症和主要围手术期并发症方面未发现显著差异。PTGBD后的时机并不影响手术并发症的发生率。早期组的总住院时间明显更短。PTGBD对于高危AC患者是一种安全的初始干预措施,发病率低且成功率高。对于精心挑选的高危患者,PTGBD后可安全地进行紧急LC,手术时机根据每位患者的临床情况进行个性化调整。早期LC(PTGBD后)具有住院时间短、成本低的优势,并且避免了等待延迟手术时出现胆系并发症和死亡的风险,与晚期LC相比发病率无显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验