Center for Limnology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Aquatic Science Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Ecology. 2024 Oct;105(10):e4413. doi: 10.1002/ecy.4413. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
The landscape theory of food web architecture (LTFWA) describes relationships among body size, trophic position, mobility, and energy channels that serve to couple heterogenous habitats, which in turn promotes long-term system stability. However, empirical tests of the LTFWA are rare and support differs among terrestrial, freshwater, and marine systems. Further, it is unclear whether the theory applies in highly altered ecosystems dominated by introduced species such as the Laurentian Great Lakes. Here, we provide an empirical test of the LTFWA by relating body size, trophic position, and the coupling of different energy channels using stable isotope data from species throughout the Lake Michigan food web. We found that body size was positively related to trophic position, but for a given trophic position, organisms predominately supported by pelagic energy had smaller body sizes than organisms predominately supported by nearshore benthic energy. We also found a hump-shaped trophic relationship in the food web where there is a gradual increase in the coupling of pelagic and nearshore energy channels with larger body sizes as well as higher trophic positions. This highlights the important role of body size and connectivity among habitats in structuring food webs. However, important deviations from expectations are suggestive of how species introductions and other anthropogenic impacts can affect food web structure in large lakes. First, native top predators appear to be flexible couplers that may provide food web resilience, whereas introduced top predators may confer less stability when they specialize on a single energy pathway. Second, some smaller bodied prey fish and invertebrates, in addition to mobile predators, coupled energy from pelagic and nearshore energy channels, which suggests that some prey species may also be important integrators of energy pathways in the system. We conclude that patterns predicted by the LTFWA are present in the face of species introductions and other anthropogenic stressors to a degree, but time-series evaluations are needed to fully understand the mechanisms that promote stability.
食物网结构的景观理论(LTFWA)描述了体型、营养位、移动性和能量通道之间的关系,这些关系将异质生境耦合在一起,从而促进了系统的长期稳定性。然而,对 LTFWA 的实证检验很少,而且在陆地、淡水和海洋系统中的支持程度也不同。此外,尚不清楚该理论是否适用于以引进物种为主的高度受干扰的生态系统,如大湖地区的洛矶山脉五大湖。在这里,我们通过使用来自密歇根湖整个食物网中物种的稳定同位素数据,从体型、营养位和不同能量通道的耦合关系来检验 LTFWA 的理论。我们发现,体型与营养位呈正相关,但对于给定的营养位,主要由浮游能量支持的生物的体型比主要由近岸底栖能量支持的生物的体型小。我们还发现,食物网中存在一种“驼峰状”的营养关系,随着体型的增大和营养位的升高,浮游和近岸能量通道的耦合逐渐增加。这突出了体型和栖息地之间的连通性在构建食物网结构中的重要作用。然而,与预期的重要偏差表明,物种引进和其他人为影响如何影响大湖中食物网的结构。首先,本地顶级捕食者似乎是灵活的耦合器,它们可能为食物网提供恢复力,而引进的顶级捕食者可能会在专门依赖单一能量途径时降低稳定性。其次,一些较小体型的猎物鱼类和无脊椎动物,除了移动性捕食者外,还从浮游和近岸能量通道中耦合能量,这表明一些猎物物种在系统中可能也是能量途径的重要整合者。我们的结论是,在一定程度上,LTFWA 预测的模式存在于物种引进和其他人为压力的情况下,但需要进行时间序列评估,以充分了解促进稳定性的机制。