Murphy Robin J, Sumner Rachael L, Godfrey Kate, Mabidikama Acima, Roberts Reece P, Sundram Frederick, Muthukumaraswamy Suresh
School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Centre for Psychedelic Research, Division of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2025 Feb;242(2):337-351. doi: 10.1007/s00213-024-06680-z. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
Enhanced creativity is often cited as an effect of microdosing (taking repeated low doses of a psychedelic drug). There have been recent efforts to validate the reported effects of microdosing, however creativity remains a difficult construct to quantify.
The current study aimed to assess microdosing's effects on creativity using a multimodal battery of tests as part of a randomised controlled trial of microdosing lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD).
Eighty healthy adult males were given 10 µg doses of LSD or placebo every third day for six weeks (14 total doses). Creativity tasks were administered at a drug-free baseline session, at a first dosing session during the acute phase of the drug's effects, and in a drug-free final session following the six-week microdosing regimen. Creativity tasks were the Alternate Uses Test (AUT), Remote Associates Task (RAT), Consensual Assessment Technique (CAT), and an Everyday Problem-Solving Questionnaire (EPSQ).
No effect of drug by time was found on the AUT, RAT, CAT, or EPSQ. Baseline vocabulary skill had a significant effect on AUT and RAT scores.
Despite participants reporting feeling more creative on dose days, objective measurement found no acute or durable effects of the microdosing protocol on creativity. Possible explanations of these null findings are that laboratory testing conditions may negatively affect ability to detect naturalistic differences in creative performance, the tests available do not capture the facets of creativity that are anecdotally affected by microdosing, or that reported enhancements of creativity are placebo effects.
增强创造力常被认为是微剂量服用(反复服用低剂量致幻药物)的效果。近期有人努力验证微剂量服用所报告的效果,然而创造力仍是一个难以量化的概念。
本研究旨在通过一系列多模式测试评估微剂量服用对创造力的影响,该测试是微剂量服用麦角酸二乙酰胺(LSD)随机对照试验的一部分。
80名健康成年男性每三天服用10微克LSD或安慰剂,持续六周(共14剂)。在无药物的基线期、药物效果急性期的首次给药期以及六周微剂量服用方案后的无药物最终期进行创造力任务测试。创造力任务包括替代用途测试(AUT)、远距离联想任务(RAT)、共识评估技术(CAT)和日常问题解决问卷(EPSQ)。
未发现药物与时间对AUT、RAT、CAT或EPSQ有影响。基线词汇技能对AUT和RAT分数有显著影响。
尽管参与者报告在服药日感觉更有创造力,但客观测量发现微剂量服用方案对创造力没有急性或持久影响。这些阴性结果的可能解释是,实验室测试条件可能对检测创造性表现的自然差异能力产生负面影响,现有的测试未涵盖微剂量服用传闻中会影响的创造力方面,或者所报告的创造力增强是安慰剂效应。