• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大麻法律和精神健康障碍治疗药物的使用。

Cannabis Laws and Utilization of Medications for the Treatment of Mental Health Disorders.

机构信息

School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.

Department of Public Administration and Policy, University of Georgia, School of Public & International Affairs, Athens.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2432021. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32021.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32021
PMID:39235808
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11377998/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Mental health disorders are prevalent yet undertreated health conditions in the US. Given perceptions about the potential effect of cannabis on individuals with mental health disorders, there is a need to understand the association of cannabis laws with psychotropic use.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of medical and recreational cannabis laws and dispensary openings with the dispensing of psychotropic medications used to treat mental health disorders in the US.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study of 10 013 948 commercially insured patients used a synthetic control method to examine the association of cannabis policies with prescribing. Data on all patients dispensed prescriptions for each of the 5 classes of psychotropic medications from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2020, were extracted from Optum's deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart Database. Statistical analysis was performed from September 2022 to November 2023.

EXPOSURES

The 4 exposure variables measured were whether medical or recreational cannabis laws were in effect and whether medical or recreational cannabis dispensaries were open in each state and calendar quarter.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES

One measure of the extensive margins of dispensing and 2 measures of the intensive margins of dispensing were constructed for 5 medication classes (benzodiazepines, antidepressants, antipsychotics, barbiturates, and sleep medications).

RESULTS

The primary sample (the benzodiazepine sample) included 3 848 721 patients (mean [SD] age, 46.1 [11.4] years; 65.4% women; 53.7% aged 35-54 years). Medical cannabis laws were associated with a 12.4% reduction in the benzodiazepine fill rate (average treatment effect on the treated [ATT], -27.4; 95% CI, -14.7 to 12.0; P = .001), recreational cannabis laws were associated with a 15.2% reduction in the fill rate (ATT, -32.5; 95% CI, -24.4 to 20.1; P = .02), and medical cannabis laws were associated with a 1.3% reduction in the mean number of benzodiazepine fills per patient (ATT, -0.02; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.02; P = .04). Medical dispensaries were associated with a 3.9% reduction in mean days' supply per benzodiazepine fill (ATT, -1.7; 95% CI, -0.8 to 0.6; P = .001), while recreational dispensaries were associated with a 6.2% reduction (ATT, -2.4; 95% CI, -1.0 to 0.9; P < .001). Medical cannabis laws were associated with a 3.8% increase in antidepressant fills (ATT, 27.2; 95% CI, -33.5 to 26.9; P = .048), and medical dispensaries were associated with an 8.8% increase (ATT, 50.7; 95% CI, -32.3 to 28.4; P = .004). The mean number of antipsychotic medication fills per patient increased by 2.5% (ATT, 0.06; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.05; P = .02) after medical cannabis laws and by 2.5% (ATT, 0.06; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.04; P = .02) after medical dispensary openings. Findings for the other drug classes showed substantial heterogeneity by state and direction of association.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cross-sectional study of commercially insured patients suggests that there may have been meaningful heterogeneous associations between cannabis policy and state and between cannabis policy and drug class (eg, decreases in dispensing of benzodiazepines but increases in dispensing of antidepressants and antipsychotics). This finding suggests additional clinical research is needed to understand the association between cannabis use and mental health. The results have implications for patient substance use and mental health-related outcomes.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9cb/11377998/00f52a8a7bf3/jamanetwopen-e2432021-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9cb/11377998/00f52a8a7bf3/jamanetwopen-e2432021-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f9cb/11377998/00f52a8a7bf3/jamanetwopen-e2432021-g001.jpg
摘要

重要性

心理健康障碍在美国是普遍存在但治疗不足的健康问题。鉴于人们对大麻可能对心理健康障碍患者产生影响的看法,有必要了解大麻法规与精神药物使用之间的关联。

目的

调查医疗和娱乐用大麻法规以及大麻药房开业与美国治疗心理健康障碍的精神药物配药之间的关联。

设计、设置和参与者:这项对 10013948 名商业保险患者的横断面研究使用合成对照法来研究大麻政策与处方之间的关联。从 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日,从 Optum 的匿名 Clinformatics Data Mart 数据库中提取了所有患者每类 5 种精神药物的处方配药数据。统计分析于 2022 年 9 月至 2023 年 11 月进行。

暴露因素

测量的 4 个暴露变量是医疗或娱乐用大麻法规是否生效以及每个州和日历季度的医疗或娱乐用大麻药房是否开业。

主要结果和测量

为 5 种药物类别(苯二氮䓬类、抗抑郁药、抗精神病药、巴比妥类和睡眠药物)构建了一个广泛配药边缘和两个密集配药边缘的度量。

结果

主要样本(苯二氮䓬类样本)包括 3848721 名患者(平均[标准差]年龄 46.1[11.4]岁;65.4%为女性;53.7%年龄在 35-54 岁之间)。医疗大麻法规与苯二氮䓬类药物配药率降低 12.4%相关(治疗的平均治疗效果[ATT],-27.4;95%置信区间[CI],-14.7 至 12.0;P = .001),娱乐用大麻法规与配药率降低 15.2%相关(ATT,-32.5;95%CI,-24.4 至 20.1;P = .02),医疗大麻法规与每位患者的平均苯二氮䓬类药物配药量减少 1.3%相关(ATT,-0.02;95%CI,-0.02 至 0.02;P = .04)。医疗大麻药房与平均苯二氮䓬类药物配药天数减少 3.9%相关(ATT,-1.7;95%CI,-0.8 至 0.6;P = .001),而娱乐用大麻药房与配药天数减少 6.2%相关(ATT,-2.4;95%CI,-1.0 至 0.9;P < .001)。医疗大麻法规与抗抑郁药配药量增加 3.8%相关(ATT,27.2;95%CI,-33.5 至 26.9;P = .048),医疗大麻药房与配药量增加 8.8%相关(ATT,50.7;95%CI,-32.3 至 28.4;P = .004)。每位患者的抗精神病药物配药量增加 2.5%(ATT,0.06;95%CI,-0.04 至 0.05;P = .02),这是在医疗大麻法规生效后出现的情况,在医疗大麻药房开业后也出现了 2.5%的增长(ATT,0.06;95%CI,-0.04 至 0.04;P = .02)。其他药物类别的发现显示出州和药物类别的关联存在实质性异质性。

结论和相关性

这项对商业保险患者的横断面研究表明,大麻政策与州之间以及大麻政策与药物类别之间可能存在有意义的混杂关联(例如,苯二氮䓬类药物的配药减少,但抗抑郁药和抗精神病药的配药增加)。这一发现表明需要进一步进行临床研究,以了解大麻使用与心理健康之间的关联。结果对患者的物质使用和与心理健康相关的结果有影响。

相似文献

1
Cannabis Laws and Utilization of Medications for the Treatment of Mental Health Disorders.大麻法律和精神健康障碍治疗药物的使用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2432021. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32021.
2
Changes in Opioid and Benzodiazepine Poisoning Deaths After Cannabis Legalization in the US: A County-level Analysis, 2002-2020.美国大麻合法化后阿片类药物和苯二氮䓬类药物中毒死亡的变化:2002-2020 年的县级分析。
Epidemiology. 2023 Jul 1;34(4):467-475. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001609. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
3
Association Between US State Medical Cannabis Laws and Opioid Prescribing in the Medicare Part D Population.美国州医疗大麻法律与医疗保险处方中阿片类药物开方之间的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 May 1;178(5):667-672. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0266.
4
Evaluation of State Cannabis Laws and Rates of Self-harm and Assault.评估州级大麻法律与自残和袭击率的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e211955. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1955.
5
Association of State Policies Allowing Medical Cannabis for Opioid Use Disorder With Dispensary Marketing for This Indication.州政策允许将医用大麻用于阿片类药物使用障碍与该适应症的药房营销之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2010001. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10001.
6
Recreational and Medical Cannabis Legalization and Opioid Prescriptions and Mortality.娱乐和医用大麻合法化与阿片类药物处方和死亡率。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jan 5;5(1):e234897. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.4897.
7
Association of State Cannabis Legalization With Cannabis Use Disorder and Cannabis Poisoning.州级大麻合法化与大麻使用障碍及大麻中毒的关联。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 1;82(3):228-236. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.4145.
8
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Cannabis Use Following Legalization in US States With Medical Cannabis Laws.美国有医用大麻法律的州大麻合法化后,种族和民族之间在大麻使用方面的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2127002. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.27002.
9
Recreational Cannabis Laws and Fills of Pain Prescriptions in the Privately Insured.娱乐用大麻法律与私人保险患者的止痛处方用量
Cannabis. 2025 Feb 1;8(1):121-138. doi: 10.26828/cannabis/2024/000268. eCollection 2025.
10
State Medical Cannabis Laws Associated With Reduction in Opioid Prescriptions by Orthopaedic Surgeons in Medicare Part D Cohort.与医疗保险D部分队列中骨科医生减少阿片类药物处方相关的州医用大麻法律。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 Feb 15;29(4):e188-e197. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00767.

本文引用的文献

1
Balancing risks and benefits of cannabis use: umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and observational studies.权衡使用大麻的风险和益处:对随机对照试验和观察性研究的荟萃分析进行伞式综述。
BMJ. 2023 Aug 30;382:e072348. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072348.
2
Risk of depressive disorders associated with medical cannabis authorization: A propensity score matched cohort study.与医用大麻授权相关的抑郁障碍风险:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Feb;320:115047. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.115047. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
3
Association of cannabis potency with mental ill health and addiction: a systematic review.
大麻效力与心理健康和成瘾的关联:系统综述。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Sep;9(9):736-750. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00161-4. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
4
Recreational cannabis legalizations associated with reductions in prescription drug utilization among Medicaid enrollees.娱乐性大麻合法化与医疗补助计划参保者处方药使用减少有关。
Health Econ. 2022 Jul;31(7):1513-1521. doi: 10.1002/hec.4519. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
5
Changes in Initial Opioid Prescribing Practices After the 2016 Release of the CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain.《2016 年美国疾病预防控制中心发布慢性疼痛阿片类药物处方指南后初始阿片类药物处方实践的变化》。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2116860. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16860.
6
The associations between prenatal cannabis use disorder and neonatal outcomes.产前大麻使用障碍与新生儿结局的关联。
Addiction. 2021 Nov;116(11):3069-3079. doi: 10.1111/add.15467. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
7
Can policy affect initiation of addictive substance use? Evidence from opioid prescribing.政策会影响成瘾物质的使用初始吗?来自阿片类药物处方的证据。
J Health Econ. 2021 Mar;76:102397. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102397. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
8
Association of Opioid Prescribing Patterns With Prescription Opioid Overdose in Adolescents and Young Adults.阿片类药物处方模式与青少年和年轻成年人处方类阿片药物过量的关联。
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Feb 1;174(2):141-148. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.4878.
9
Cannabis Use and the Risk for Psychosis and Affective Disorders.大麻使用与精神病和情感障碍风险
J Dual Diagn. 2020 Jan-Mar;16(1):22-42. doi: 10.1080/15504263.2019.1674991. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
10
Mental health in the Americas: an overview of the treatment gap.美洲地区的心理健康:治疗差距概述
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2018 Oct 10;42:e165. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2018.165. eCollection 2018.