• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Association Between US State Medical Cannabis Laws and Opioid Prescribing in the Medicare Part D Population.美国州医疗大麻法律与医疗保险处方中阿片类药物开方之间的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 May 1;178(5):667-672. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0266.
2
State Medical Cannabis Laws Associated With Reduction in Opioid Prescriptions by Orthopaedic Surgeons in Medicare Part D Cohort.与医疗保险D部分队列中骨科医生减少阿片类药物处方相关的州医用大麻法律。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 Feb 15;29(4):e188-e197. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00767.
3
Pharmaceutical payments to physicians may increase prescribing for opioids.药企给医生的报酬可能会增加阿片类药物的处方量。
Addiction. 2019 Jun;114(6):1051-1059. doi: 10.1111/add.14509. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
4
Association of Medical and Adult-Use Marijuana Laws With Opioid Prescribing for Medicaid Enrollees.医疗用大麻和成人使用大麻法律与医疗补助计划参保者开阿片类药物处方的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 May 1;178(5):673-679. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.1007.
5
Trends and Patterns of Geographic Variation in Opioid Prescribing Practices by State, United States, 2006-2017.2006-2017 年美国各州阿片类药物处方实践的地域差异趋势和模式。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190665. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0665.
6
Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs Produce a Limited Impact on Painkiller Prescribing in Medicare Part D.处方药监测计划对医疗保险部分 D 中止痛药的处方开具影响有限。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr;53(2):671-689. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12652. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
7
Opioid dispensing and overlap in veterans with non-cancer pain eligible for Medicare Part D.符合医疗保险D部分条件的患有非癌性疼痛的退伍军人的阿片类药物配给与重叠情况。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 May-Jun;57(3):333-340.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.02.018. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
8
Association of Formulary Exclusions and Restrictions for Opioid Alternatives With Opioid Prescribing Among Medicare Beneficiaries.医保受益人群中,处方集排除和限制类阿片替代药物与阿片类药物处方之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e200274. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0274.
9
Association of Hydrocodone Schedule Change With Opioid Prescriptions Following Surgery.氢可酮给药途径改变与术后阿片类药物处方的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Dec 1;153(12):1111-1119. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2651.
10
Effects of U.S. State Medical Cannabis Laws on Treatment of Chronic Noncancer Pain.美国州级医用大麻法规对慢性非癌性疼痛治疗的影响。
Ann Intern Med. 2023 Jul;176(7):904-912. doi: 10.7326/M23-0053. Epub 2023 Jul 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Cannabis Exposure on Adolescent Health and Development: A Narrative Review.大麻暴露对青少年健康与发育的影响:一项叙述性综述
Curr Drug Res Rev. 2025;17(2):160-169. doi: 10.2174/0125899775273727231224185028.
2
Cannabis Use in Opioid Maintenance Therapy: Prevalence, Clinical Correlates and Reasons for Use.阿片类药物维持治疗中使用大麻的情况:患病率、临床关联及使用原因
Brain Sci. 2025 Jun 29;15(7):699. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15070699.
3
Exploring pain management preferences: a discrete choice experiment on cannabis or opioids among middle-aged and older adults.探索疼痛管理偏好:一项针对中老年人对大麻或阿片类药物的离散选择实验。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2025 Jul 3;44(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s41043-025-00989-x.
4
Cannabis Legalization and Opioid Use Disorder in Veterans Health Administration Patients.退伍军人健康管理局患者中的大麻合法化与阿片类物质使用障碍
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jun 7;6(6):e251369. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1369.
5
Association Between Legal Access to Medical Cannabis and Frequency of Non-Medical Prescription Opioid Use Among U.S. Adults.美国成年人合法获取医用大麻与非医疗处方阿片类药物使用频率之间的关联。
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2025 Apr;23(2):1663-1676. doi: 10.1007/s11469-023-01191-y. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
6
Medical Cannabis for Patients Over Age 50: A Multi-site, Prospective Study of Patterns of Use and Health Outcomes.50岁以上患者使用医用大麻:一项关于使用模式和健康结果的多中心前瞻性研究。
Cannabis. 2025 Feb 1;8(1):81-94. doi: 10.26828/cannabis/2024/000239. eCollection 2025.
7
Recreational Cannabis Laws and Fills of Pain Prescriptions in the Privately Insured.娱乐用大麻法律与私人保险患者的止痛处方用量
Cannabis. 2025 Feb 1;8(1):121-138. doi: 10.26828/cannabis/2024/000268. eCollection 2025.
8
Association of State Cannabis Legalization With Cannabis Use Disorder and Cannabis Poisoning.州级大麻合法化与大麻使用障碍及大麻中毒的关联。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 1;82(3):228-236. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.4145.
9
The Combined Relationship of Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Enactment and Medical Cannabis Laws with Chronic Pain-Related Healthcare Visits.处方药监测计划的制定与医用大麻法律与慢性疼痛相关医疗就诊的综合关系。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Apr;40(5):1030-1038. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09053-6. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
10
Cannabis Laws and Utilization of Medications for the Treatment of Mental Health Disorders.大麻法律和精神健康障碍治疗药物的使用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2432021. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32021.

本文引用的文献

1
How increasing medical access to opioids contributes to the opioid epidemic: Evidence from Medicare Part D.增加阿片类药物的医疗可及性如何导致阿片类药物流行:来自医疗保险处方药部分的证据。
J Health Econ. 2020 May;71:102286. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102286. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
2
Mapping medical marijuana: state laws regulating patients, product safety, supply chains and dispensaries, 2017.2017 年,医用大麻的定位:监管患者、产品安全、供应链和药房的州法律。
Addiction. 2017 Dec;112(12):2206-2216. doi: 10.1111/add.13910. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
3
Medical Marijuana Laws May Be Associated With A Decline In The Number Of Prescriptions For Medicaid Enrollees.医用大麻合法化可能与医疗补助计划参保人数的处方药数量下降有关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 May 1;36(5):945-951. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1135. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
4
Providing chronic pain management in the "Fifth Vital Sign" Era: Historical and treatment perspectives on a modern-day medical dilemma.在“第五生命体征”时代提供慢性疼痛管理:对现代医学困境的历史与治疗视角
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Apr 1;173 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-S21. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.12.002.
5
Drug Overdose Deaths in the United States, 1999-2015.1999 - 2015年美国药物过量致死情况
NCHS Data Brief. 2017 Feb(273):1-8.
6
The Increasing Use of Cannabis Among Older Americans: A Public Health Crisis or Viable Policy Alternative?美国老年人中越来越多的人使用大麻:是公共卫生危机还是可行的政策选择?
Gerontologist. 2017 Nov 10;57(6):1166-1172. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw166.
7
Medical Marijuana Laws Reduce Prescription Medication Use In Medicare Part D.医用大麻法减少了医疗保险D部分的处方药使用。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Jul 1;35(7):1230-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1661.
8
Medical Cannabis Use Is Associated With Decreased Opiate Medication Use in a Retrospective Cross-Sectional Survey of Patients With Chronic Pain.在一项针对慢性疼痛患者的回顾性横断面调查中,医用大麻的使用与阿片类药物使用减少有关。
J Pain. 2016 Jun;17(6):739-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
9
Cannabis in Pain Treatment: Clinical and Research Considerations.大麻在疼痛治疗中的应用:临床与研究考量
J Pain. 2016 Jun;17(6):654-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
10
Cannabis for the Management of Pain: Assessment of Safety Study (COMPASS).大麻用于疼痛管理:安全性研究评估(COMPASS)。
J Pain. 2015 Dec;16(12):1233-1242. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.07.014. Epub 2015 Sep 16.

美国州医疗大麻法律与医疗保险处方中阿片类药物开方之间的关联。

Association Between US State Medical Cannabis Laws and Opioid Prescribing in the Medicare Part D Population.

机构信息

Department of Public Administration & Policy, University of Georgia, Athens.

Department of Health Policy & Management, University of Georgia, Athens.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2018 May 1;178(5):667-672. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0266.

DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0266
PMID:29610897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6145794/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Opioid-related mortality increased by 15.6% from 2014 to 2015 and increased almost 320% between 2000 and 2015. Recent research finds that the use of all pain medications (opioid and nonopioid collectively) decreases in Medicare Part D and Medicaid populations when states approve medical cannabis laws (MCLs). The association between MCLs and opioid prescriptions is not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between prescribing patterns for opioids in Medicare Part D and the implementation of state MCLs.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Longitudinal analysis of the daily doses of opioids filled in Medicare Part D for all opioids as a group and for categories of opioids by state and state-level MCLs from 2010 through 2015. Separate models were estimated first for whether the state had implemented any MCL and second for whether a state had implemented either a dispensary-based or a home cultivation only-based MCL.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was the total number of daily opioid doses prescribed (in millions) in each US state for all opioids. The secondary analysis examined the association between MCLs separately by opioid class.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2015 there were 23.08 million daily doses of any opioid dispensed per year in the average state under Medicare Part D. Multiple regression analysis results found that patients filled fewer daily doses of any opioid in states with an MCL. The associations between MCLs and any opioid prescribing were statistically significant when we took the type of MCL into account: states with active dispensaries saw 3.742 million fewer daily doses filled (95% CI, -6.289 to -1.194); states with home cultivation only MCLs saw 1.792 million fewer filled daily doses (95% CI, -3.532 to -0.052). Results varied by type of opioid, with statistically significant estimated negative associations observed for hydrocodone and morphine. Hydrocodone use decreased by 2.320 million daily doses (or 17.4%) filled with dispensary-based MCLs (95% CI, -3.782 to -0.859; P = .002) and decreased by 1.256 million daily doses (or 9.4%) filled with home-cultivation-only-based MCLs (95% CI, -2.319 to -0.193; P = .02). Morphine use decreased by 0.361 million daily doses (or 20.7%) filled with dispensary-based MCLs (95% CI, -0.718 to -0.005; P = .047).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Medical cannabis laws are associated with significant reductions in opioid prescribing in the Medicare Part D population. This finding was particularly strong in states that permit dispensaries, and for reductions in hydrocodone and morphine prescriptions.

摘要

重要性

从 2014 年到 2015 年,阿片类药物相关死亡率上升了 15.6%,而在 2000 年到 2015 年期间,这一数字几乎增加了 320%。最近的研究发现,当各州批准医疗大麻法(MCL)时,医疗保险部分 D 和医疗补助计划中的所有人用止痛药(阿片类药物和非阿片类药物)的使用量都会减少。MCL 与阿片类药物处方之间的关联尚不清楚。

目的

研究医疗保险部分 D 中阿片类药物处方模式与州 MCL 实施之间的关联。

设计、设置和参与者:对 2010 年至 2015 年期间,医疗保险部分 D 中所有阿片类药物以及按州和州级 MCL 分类的阿片类药物的每日剂量进行的纵向分析。首先分别估计了州是否实施了任何 MCL,其次是州是否实施了基于药房的或仅基于家庭种植的 MCL。

主要结局和措施

主要结局指标是医疗保险部分 D 中每个州的所有阿片类药物的每日处方剂量总数(百万)。二次分析分别检查了 MCL 对不同类别的阿片类药物的影响。

结果

从 2010 年到 2015 年,医疗保险部分 D 中每个州每年平均开出 2308 万份任何阿片类药物的每日剂量。多元回归分析结果发现,在有 MCL 的州,患者的每日阿片类药物剂量减少。当我们考虑到 MCL 的类型时,MCL 与任何阿片类药物处方之间的关联具有统计学意义:有活性药房的州,每日剂量减少 374.2 万剂(95%CI,-6.289 至-1.194);只有家庭种植 MCL 的州,每日剂量减少 179.2 万剂(95%CI,-3.532 至-0.052)。结果因阿片类药物的类型而异,氢可酮和吗啡的估计负相关具有统计学意义。有基于药房的 MCL,氢可酮的使用量减少了 232 万剂(或 17.4%)(95%CI,-3.782 至-0.859;P=0.002);有基于家庭种植的 MCL,氢可酮的使用量减少了 125.6 万剂(或 9.4%)(95%CI,-2.319 至-0.193;P=0.02)。吗啡的使用量减少了 36.1 万剂(或 20.7%),有基于药房的 MCL(95%CI,-0.718 至-0.005;P=0.047)。

结论和相关性

医疗大麻法与医疗保险部分 D 人群中阿片类药物处方的显著减少有关。在允许药房存在的州,这种发现尤其强烈,并且减少了氢可酮和吗啡的处方。