de Oliveira Almeida Gustavo, Balieiro Caroline, Bertoli Edmundo Damiani, Moreira Maria Eduarda Liporaci, Silva Ana Laura Soares, Minucci Bárbara Silvestre, Zapparoli Isabella, Maluf Marcela Silva, Carvalho Henrique Champs Porfírio, Dos Santos Borges Rafael, Pasqualotto Eric, Nienkötter Thiago, Alves Vinícius, Guida Camila Mota
Department of Medicine, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba.
Department of Medicine, State University of Amazonas, Manaus.
Coron Artery Dis. 2025 Jan 1;36(1):9-17. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000001407. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
The efficacy of adding ezetimibe to statin therapy for event reduction in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remains a topic of ongoing debate.
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ezetimibe plus statin versus statin monotherapy in patients with ACS. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for eligible trials. The random-effects model was used to calculate the risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical analyses were performed using RStudio version 4.2.3 (RStudio, PBC).
Six RCTs comprising 20 574 patients with ACS were included, of whom 10 259 (49.9%) were prescribed ezetimibe plus statin. The patient population had an average age of 63.8 years, and 75.1% were male. Compared with statin monotherapy, ezetimibe plus statin significantly reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (risk ratio 0.93; 95% CI 0.90-0.97; P < 0.01) and nonfatal myocardial infarction (risk ratio 0.88; 95% CI 0.81-0.95; P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between groups for revascularization (risk ratio 0.94; 95% CI 0.90-1.00; P = 0.03), all-cause mortality (risk ratio 0.87; 95% CI 0.63-1.21; P = 0.42), or unstable angina (risk ratio 1.05; 95% CI 0.86-1.27; P = 0.64).
In this meta-analysis of patients with ACS, the combination of ezetimibe plus statin was associated with a reduction in MACE and nonfatal myocardial infarction, compared with statin monotherapy.
在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中,在他汀类药物治疗基础上加用依折麦布以减少事件发生的疗效仍是一个持续争论的话题。
我们对比较依折麦布加他汀类药物与他汀类药物单药治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。我们在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane中检索符合条件的试验。采用随机效应模型计算风险比及95%置信区间(CI)。使用RStudio 4.2.3版本(RStudio,PBC)进行统计分析。
纳入了6项随机对照试验,共20574例急性冠状动脉综合征患者,其中10259例(49.9%)接受依折麦布加他汀类药物治疗。患者人群平均年龄为63.8岁,75.1%为男性。与他汀类药物单药治疗相比,依折麦布加他汀类药物显著降低了主要不良心血管事件(MACE)(风险比0.93;95%CI 0.90 - 0.97;P < 0.01)和非致命性心肌梗死(风险比0.88;95%CI 0.81 - 0.95;P < 0.01)。两组在血运重建(风险比0.94;95%CI 0.90 - 1.00;P = 0.03)、全因死亡率(风险比0.87;95%CI 0.63 - 1.21;P = 0.42)或不稳定型心绞痛(风险比1.05;95%CI 0.86 - 1.27;P = 0.64)方面无显著差异。
在这项针对急性冠状动脉综合征患者的荟萃分析中,与他汀类药物单药治疗相比,依折麦布加他汀类药物联合治疗与主要不良心血管事件和非致命性心肌梗死的减少相关。