• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在莫桑比克实施世界卫生组织安全分娩检查表(SCC)的障碍与促进因素:一项运用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)的定性研究

Barriers and facilitators for implementing the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC) in Mozambique: A qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

作者信息

He Anqi, Kanduma Elsa Luís, Pérez-Escamilla Rafael, Buckshee Devina, Chaquisse Eusébio, Cuco Rosa Marlene, Desai Mayur Mahesh, Munguambe Danícia, Reames Sakina Erika, Manuel Isaías Ramiro, Spiegelman Donna, Xu Dong

机构信息

Department of Health Policy, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.

Comité para Saúde de Moçambique, Maputo City, Mozambique.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Sep 5;4(9):e0003174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003174. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0003174
PMID:39236014
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11376584/
Abstract

High maternal and neonatal mortality rates persist in Mozambique, with stillbirths remaining understudied. Most maternal and neonatal deaths in the country are due to preventable and treatable childbirth-related complications that often occur in low-resource settings. The World Health Organization introduced the Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC) in 2015 to reduce adverse birth outcomes. The SCC, a structured list of evidence-based practices, targets the main causes of maternal and neonatal deaths and stillbirths in healthcare facilities. The SCC has been tested in over 35 countries, demonstrating its ability to improve the quality of care. However, it has not been adopted in Mozambique. This study aimed to identify potential facilitators and barriers to SCC implementation from the perspective of birth attendants, clinical administrators, and decision-makers to inform future SCC implementation in Mozambique. We conducted a qualitative study involving focus group discussions with birth attendants (n = 24) and individual interviews with clinical administrators (n = 6) and decision-makers (n = 8). The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided the questions used in the interviews and focus group discussions, as well as the subsequent data analysis. A deductive thematic analysis of Portuguese-to-English translated transcripts was performed. In Mozambique, most barriers to potential SCC implementation stem from the challenges within a weak health system, including underfunded maternal care, lack of infrastructure and human resources, and low provider motivation. The simplicity of the SCC and the commitment of healthcare providers to better childbirth practices, combined with their willingness to adopt the SCC, were identified as major facilitators. To improve the feasibility of SCC implementation and increase compatibility with current childbirth routines for birth attendants, the SCC should be tailored to context-specific needs. Future research should prioritize conducting pre-implementation assessments to align the SCC more effectively with local contexts and facilitate sustainable enhancements in childbirth practices.

摘要

莫桑比克的孕产妇和新生儿死亡率居高不下,死产情况仍未得到充分研究。该国大多数孕产妇和新生儿死亡是由可预防和可治疗的分娩相关并发症导致的,这些并发症往往发生在资源匮乏的环境中。2015年,世界卫生组织推出了安全分娩检查表(SCC),以减少不良分娩结局。SCC是一份基于证据的结构化操作清单,针对医疗机构中孕产妇、新生儿死亡和死产的主要原因。SCC已在35多个国家进行了测试,证明了其改善护理质量的能力。然而,莫桑比克尚未采用该检查表。本研究旨在从接生人员、临床管理人员和决策者的角度确定SCC实施的潜在促进因素和障碍,为莫桑比克未来实施SCC提供参考。我们开展了一项定性研究,包括与24名接生人员进行焦点小组讨论,以及与6名临床管理人员和8名决策者进行个人访谈。实施研究综合框架指导了访谈和焦点小组讨论中使用的问题以及后续的数据分析。对葡萄牙语到英语的翻译转录本进行了演绎主题分析。在莫桑比克,SCC潜在实施的大多数障碍源于薄弱卫生系统内部的挑战,包括孕产妇护理资金不足、缺乏基础设施和人力资源以及提供者积极性不高。SCC的简单性以及医疗保健提供者对更好分娩实践的承诺,再加上他们采用SCC的意愿,被确定为主要促进因素。为了提高SCC实施的可行性并增强与接生人员当前分娩常规的兼容性,SCC应根据具体情况进行调整。未来的研究应优先进行实施前评估,以使SCC更有效地与当地情况相匹配,并促进分娩实践的可持续改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa34/11376584/b09558e379ed/pgph.0003174.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa34/11376584/b09558e379ed/pgph.0003174.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa34/11376584/b09558e379ed/pgph.0003174.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Barriers and facilitators for implementing the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC) in Mozambique: A qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).在莫桑比克实施世界卫生组织安全分娩检查表(SCC)的障碍与促进因素:一项运用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)的定性研究
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Sep 5;4(9):e0003174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003174. eCollection 2024.
2
Barriers and facilitators of implementing the practice programme for upright positions in the second stage of labour: A mixed-method study.第二产程实施直立位实践方案的障碍与促进因素:一项混合方法研究
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Nov 3. doi: 10.1111/jan.15927.
3
Challenges to the implementation of a multi-level intervention to reduce mistreatment of women during childbirth in Iran: a qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.伊朗实施多层面干预措施以减少分娩期妇女受虐待的挑战:一项使用实施研究综合框架的定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2024 May 27;21(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01813-1.
4
Effectiveness of the WHO SCC on improving adherence to essential practices during childbirth, in resource constrained settings.在资源受限环境下,世界卫生组织安全分娩核查表对提高分娩期间基本操作依从性的有效性。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Nov 8;16(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1139-x.
5
Effectiveness of the World Health Organization Safe Childbirth Checklist (WHO-SCC) in preventing poor childbirth outcomes: a study protocol for a matched-pair cluster randomized control trial.世界卫生组织安全分娩清单(WHO-SCC)预防不良分娩结局的有效性:一项配对病例对照随机对照试验研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 10;21(1):1652. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11673-0.
6
Effectiveness of the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist program in reducing severe maternal, fetal, and newborn harm in Uttar Pradesh, India: study protocol for a matched-pair, cluster-randomized controlled trial.世界卫生组织安全分娩核对清单项目在印度北方邦减少孕产妇、胎儿和新生儿严重伤害方面的有效性:一项配对、整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Dec 7;17(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1673-x.
7
Improving quality of care for maternal and newborn health: a pre-post evaluation of the Safe Childbirth Checklist at a hospital in Bangladesh.提高母婴健康护理质量:孟加拉国一家医院的《安全分娩清单》前后评估。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Dec 4;17(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1588-x.
8
Adaptation and implementation of the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist around the world.世界卫生组织安全分娩检查表在全球的适配与实施。
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Jul 8;2(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00176-z.
9
Implementing the World Health Organization safe childbirth checklist in a district Hospital in Rwanda: a pre- and post-intervention study.在卢旺达一家地区医院实施世界卫生组织安全分娩检查表:一项干预前后研究。
Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2018 Apr 4;4:7. doi: 10.1186/s40748-018-0075-3. eCollection 2018.
10
Safe birth matters: facilitators and barriers to uptake of the WHO safe childbirth checklist tool in a Tanzania Regional Hospital.安全分娩很重要:坦桑尼亚地区医院采用世卫组织安全分娩核对表工具的促进因素和障碍。
Afr Health Sci. 2021 May;21(Suppl):44-50. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v21i1.8S.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring barriers and drivers to a modified WHO safe childbirth checklist implementation in three West African countries: a qualitative study using the updated consolidated framework for implementation research.探索在三个西非国家实施修订后的世界卫生组织安全分娩检查表的障碍和驱动因素:一项使用更新后的实施研究综合框架的定性研究
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jun 19;5:1593083. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1593083. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Midwives' experiences with a safe childbirth checklist: A grounded theory study.产婆使用安全分娩清单的经验:扎根理论研究。
Midwifery. 2023 Jul;122:103676. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103676. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
2
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.基于用户反馈的更新的实施研究综合框架。
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.
3
Implementing the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist modified for preterm birth: lessons learned and experiences from Kenya and Uganda.
实施世界卫生组织针对早产修改的安全分娩清单:肯尼亚和乌干达的经验教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 3;22(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07650-x.
4
The WHO safe childbirth checklist after 5 years: future directions for improving outcomes.5年后世界卫生组织安全分娩检查表:改善分娩结局的未来方向
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Mar;10(3):e324-e325. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00556-8.
5
Safe birth matters: facilitators and barriers to uptake of the WHO safe childbirth checklist tool in a Tanzania Regional Hospital.安全分娩很重要:坦桑尼亚地区医院采用世卫组织安全分娩核对表工具的促进因素和障碍。
Afr Health Sci. 2021 May;21(Suppl):44-50. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v21i1.8S.
6
Adaptation and implementation of the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist around the world.世界卫生组织安全分娩检查表在全球的适配与实施。
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Jul 8;2(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00176-z.
7
Implementing a modified World Health Organization safe childbirth checklist in health centers of Ethiopia: a pre and post intervention study.在埃塞俄比亚的卫生中心实施世界卫生组织改良的安全分娩清单:一项干预前后研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jan 22;21(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03565-3.
8
Cohort Profile Update: Manhiça Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) of the Manhiça Health Research Centre (CISM).队列简介更新:曼希卡健康研究中心(CISM)的曼希卡健康与人口监测系统(HDSS)
Int J Epidemiol. 2021 May 17;50(2):395. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa218.
9
Feasibility study on the adoption of the WHO safe childbirth checklist by front-line healthcare providers and managers in Burkina Faso and Côte d'Ivoire.布基纳法索和科特迪瓦的一线医疗服务提供者及管理人员采用世界卫生组织安全分娩检查表的可行性研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Oct 6;6:150. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00691-1. eCollection 2020.
10
Does adherence to evidence-based practices during childbirth prevent perinatal mortality? A post-hoc analysis of 3,274 births in Uttar Pradesh, India.分娩时是否遵循基于证据的实践可以预防围产期死亡?印度北方邦 3274 例分娩的事后分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Sep;5(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002268.