Boehnke Kevin F, Scott J Ryan, Martel Marc O, Smith Tristin, Bergmans Rachel S, Kruger Daniel J, Williams David A, Fitzcharles Mary-Ann
University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2024 Dec;6(12):826-835. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11717. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
There are numerous reports of people substituting medical cannabis (MC) for medications. Our obejctive was to investigate the degree to which this substitution occurs among people with rheumatic conditions.
In a secondary analysis from a cross-sectional survey conducted with patient advocacy groups in the US and Canada, we investigated MC use and medication substitution among people with rheumatic conditions. We subgrouped by whether participants substituted MC for medications and investigated differences in perceived symptom changes and use patterns, including methods of ingestion, cannabinoid content (cannabidiol vs delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol [THC]), and use frequency.
Among 763 participants, 62.5% reported substituting MC products for medications, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (54.7%), opioids (48.6%), sleep aids (29.6%), and muscle relaxants (25.2%). Following substitution, most participants reported decreases or cessation in medication use. The primary reasons for substitution were fewer adverse effects, better symptom management, and concerns about withdrawal symptoms. Substitution was associated with THC use and significantly higher symptom improvements (including pain, sleep, anxiety, and joint stiffness) than nonsubstitution, and a higher proportion of substitutors used inhalation routes than those who did not.
Although the determination of causality is limited by our cross-sectional design, these findings suggest that an appreciable number of people with rheumatic diseases substitute medications with MC for symptom management. Inhalation of MC products containing some THC was most commonly identified among those substituting, and disease characteristics did not differ by substitution status. Further study is needed to better understand the role of MC for symptom management in rheumatic conditions.
有大量关于人们用医用大麻(MC)替代药物的报道。我们的目的是调查这种替代在风湿性疾病患者中发生的程度。
在美国和加拿大与患者倡导团体进行的一项横断面调查的二次分析中,我们调查了风湿性疾病患者中MC的使用情况和药物替代情况。我们根据参与者是否用MC替代药物进行分组,并调查了感知症状变化和使用模式的差异,包括摄入方法、大麻素含量(大麻二酚与δ-9-四氢大麻酚[THC])以及使用频率。
在763名参与者中,62.5%报告用MC产品替代药物,包括非甾体抗炎药(54.7%)、阿片类药物(48.6%)、助眠药物(29.6%)和肌肉松弛剂(25.2%)。替代后,大多数参与者报告药物使用减少或停止。替代的主要原因是不良反应较少、症状管理更好以及对戒断症状的担忧。与未替代相比,替代与使用THC以及症状改善显著更高(包括疼痛、睡眠、焦虑和关节僵硬)相关,并且替代者中使用吸入途径的比例高于未替代者。
尽管因果关系的确定受我们横断面设计的限制,但这些发现表明,相当数量的风湿性疾病患者用MC替代药物来管理症状。在替代者中,最常发现吸入含有一定量THC的MC产品,并且疾病特征在替代状态方面没有差异。需要进一步研究以更好地理解MC在风湿性疾病症状管理中的作用。