Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Radiother Oncol. 2024 Nov;200:110521. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110521. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
The aim of this secondary analysis of the prospective randomized phase 2 PET-Plan trial (ARO-2009-09; NCT00697333) was to evaluate the impact of mediastinal tumor burden and lymphatic spread in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
All patients treated per protocol (n = 172) were included. Patients received isotoxically dose-escalated chemoradiotherapy up to a total dose of 60-74 Gy in 30-37 fractions, aiming as high as possible while adhering to normal tissue constraints. Radiation treatment (RT) planning was based on an F-FDG PET/CT targeting all lymph node (LN) stations containing CT positive LNs (i.e. short axis diameter > 10 mm), even if PET-negative (arm A) or targeting only LN stations containing PET-positive nodes (arm B). LN stations were classified into echelon 1 (ipsilateral hilum), 2 (ipsilateral station 4 and 7), and 3 (rest of the mediastinum, contralateral hilum). The endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and freedom from local progression (FFLP).
The median follow-up time (95 % confidence interval [CI]) was 41.1 (33.8 - 50.4) months. Patients with a high absolute number of PET-positive LN stations had worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.09; 95 % CI 0.99 - 1.18; p = 0.05) and PFS (HR = 1.12; 95 % CI 1.04 - 1.20; p = 0.003), irrespective of treatment arm allocation. The prescribed RT dose to the LNs did not correlate with any of the endpoints when considering all patients. However, in patients in arm B (i.e., PET-based selective nodal irradiation), prescribed RT dose to each LN station correlated significantly with FFLP (HR=0.45; 95 % CI 0.24-0.85; p = 0.01). Furthermore, patients with involvement of echelon 3 LN stations had worse PFS (HR = 2.22; 95 % CI 1.16-4.28; p = 0.02), also irrespective of allocation.
Mediastinal tumor burden and lymphatic involvement patterns influence outcome in patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced NSCLC. Higher dose to LNs did not improve OS, but did improve FFLP in patients treated with PET-based dose-escalated RT.
本研究对前瞻性随机 2 期 PET-Plan 试验(ARO-2009-09;NCT00697333)进行二次分析,旨在评估局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者纵隔肿瘤负荷和淋巴扩散对预后的影响。
所有按方案治疗的患者(n=172)均被纳入本研究。所有患者接受等毒性剂量递增放化疗,总剂量为 60-74Gy,分 30-37 次给予,在不超过正常组织耐受剂量的前提下,尽量提高剂量。放疗计划基于 F-FDG PET/CT,对包含 CT 阳性淋巴结(短轴直径>10mm)的所有淋巴结站进行定位,即使这些淋巴结 PET 为阴性(A 组)或仅对 PET 阳性淋巴结站进行定位(B 组)。淋巴结站分为第 1 梯队(同侧肺门)、第 2 梯队(同侧站 4 和 7)和第 3 梯队(其余纵隔,对侧肺门)。终点包括总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和局部无进展率(FFLP)。
中位随访时间(95%置信区间 [CI])为 41.1(33.8-50.4)个月。PET 阳性淋巴结站绝对数量较高的患者 OS(风险比 [HR]1.09;95%CI 0.99-1.18;p=0.05)和 PFS(HR 1.12;95%CI 1.04-1.20;p=0.003)更差,无论治疗分组如何。当考虑所有患者时,LN 所接受的处方放疗剂量与任何终点均无相关性。然而,在 B 组(即基于 PET 的选择性淋巴结照射)中,每个 LN 站接受的处方放疗剂量与 FFLP 显著相关(HR=0.45;95%CI 0.24-0.85;p=0.01)。此外,累及第 3 梯队淋巴结站的患者 PFS 更差(HR 2.22;95%CI 1.16-4.28;p=0.02),同样与分组无关。
在接受局部晚期 NSCLC 根治性放化疗的患者中,纵隔肿瘤负荷和淋巴扩散模式影响预后。给予更高剂量的 LN 放疗并不能改善 OS,但可改善接受基于 PET 的剂量递增放疗患者的 FFLP。