School of Environment, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, UCAS, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310024, China; State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100085, China; School of Global Health, Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Key Laboratory of Yangtze River Water Environment, Ministry of Education, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Environ Res. 2024 Dec 1;262(Pt 2):119920. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119920. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
Environmental occurrence and risks of novel synthetic phenolic antioxidants (SPAs) remain largely unclear. By using a typical algae (Chlorella pyrenoidosa) as model organism, we evaluated the ecological risks of both traditional and novel SPAs, based on their concentrations in water, sediment, and soil collected from the Yangtze River Delta, China. Detection frequencies (DFs) of 10 novel SPAs were 25-100% in water, 3-100% in sediment, and 0-100% in soil, with geometric means (GMs) of 2700 ng/L, 1270 ng/g, and 2440 ng/g, respectively. For 8 traditional SPAs, DFs were 50-100% (GM: 680 ng/L), 3-100% (534 ng/g), and 47-100% (2240 ng/g) in water, sediment, and soil, respectively. AO3114 was the main pollutant in water, while AO1010 dominated in sediment and soil. Notably, low-molecular-weight SPAs showed migration behavior from sediment to water. Four SPAs (AO626, AO1035, AO1098, and AO1076) showed dose- and time-dependent toxicity on Chlorella pyrenoidosa. As time progressed, sediment-released SPAs became more toxic than those in water. Two SPAs (AO1135 and BHT-Q) posed high risks (RQ > 1) to green algae, daphnia, and fish. The SPA mixture exhibited high risks (RQ > 1) to these organisms, increasing with the trophic level. This research holds valuable guidance for further SPA risk assessments.
新型合成酚类抗氧化剂 (SPAs) 的环境归趋和风险在很大程度上仍不清楚。本研究以典型藻类(蛋白核小球藻)为模型生物,基于长江三角洲采集的水、沉积物和土壤中 SPA 的浓度,评估了传统和新型 SPA 的生态风险。在水中,10 种新型 SPA 的检出频率 (DF) 为 25-100%,在沉积物中为 3-100%,在土壤中为 0-100%,几何平均值 (GM) 分别为 2700ng/L、1270ng/g 和 2440ng/g。8 种传统 SPA 在水中的检出频率为 50-100%(GM:680ng/L),在沉积物和土壤中的检出频率分别为 3-100%(534ng/g)和 47-100%(2240ng/g)。AO3114 是水中的主要污染物,而 AO1010 则在沉积物和土壤中占主导地位。值得注意的是,低分子量 SPA 具有从沉积物向水迁移的行为。4 种 SPA(AO626、AO1035、AO1098 和 AO1076)对蛋白核小球藻表现出剂量和时间依赖性毒性。随着时间的推移,沉积物释放的 SPA 比水中的 SPA 毒性更大。两种 SPA(AO1135 和 BHT-Q)对绿藻、水蚤和鱼类构成高风险(RQ>1)。SPA 混合物对这些生物也表现出高风险(RQ>1),随着营养水平的增加而增加。本研究为进一步的 SPA 风险评估提供了有价值的指导。