• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济地位对个体参与临床试验的态度及体验的影响。

The influence of socioeconomic status on individual attitudes and experience with clinical trials.

作者信息

Kim Jennifer Y, Florez Maria, Botto Emily, Belgrave Xoli, Grace Clare, Getz Ken

机构信息

Tufts School of Medicine, Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, Boston, MA, USA.

Parexel, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Commun Med (Lond). 2024 Sep 5;4(1):172. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00586-9.

DOI:10.1038/s43856-024-00586-9
PMID:39237734
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11377822/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Characterizing perceptions of clinical trials among the socioeconomically disadvantaged is necessary for understanding how social determinants of health such as socioeconomic disparities in education and income can affect people's awareness of and exposure to clinical trials METHODS: A survey was distributed in spring 2023 among a survey taking sample stratified by demographic variables to reflect the U.S.

POPULATION

The survey assessed the socioeconomic status of the respondent and related covariates, as well as outcome measures including interest in joining a clinical trial, concerns relating to participation, and whether the respondent had previously been asked to participate. Multiple and logistic regression were used to assess the relationship between predictor and outcome variables RESULTS: Here we show the results of outcome measures regressed on main predictors related to socioeconomic status and related demographic predictors. Education, employment status, insurance coverage, and English proficiency were significant predictors of interest in clinical trial participation. Education and the presence of a healthcare professional or former clinical trial participant in the respondent's personal network were significant predictors of whether the respondent had previously been asked to participate in a clinical trial CONCLUSIONS: The results of the analysis reveal how socioeconomically vulnerable groups, including those from low income and low education groups, are being excluded in clinical research. Analyses also uncovered the impact of clinical trial social influence-the presence of having a family or friend in one's social network who participated in a clinical trial-on willingness to participate and exposure to clinical trials.

摘要

背景

了解教育和收入方面的社会经济差异等健康的社会决定因素如何影响人们对临床试验的认知和参与情况,对于刻画社会经济弱势群体对临床试验的认知至关重要。方法:2023年春季,在一个按人口统计学变量分层的调查样本中进行了一项调查,以反映美国人口情况。调查评估了受访者的社会经济状况及相关协变量,以及包括参与临床试验的兴趣、参与相关的担忧,以及受访者此前是否曾被邀请参与等结果指标。使用多元回归和逻辑回归来评估预测变量和结果变量之间的关系。结果:在此,我们展示了以与社会经济状况相关的主要预测因素及相关人口统计学预测因素为自变量的结果指标回归分析结果。教育程度、就业状况、保险覆盖范围和英语水平是参与临床试验兴趣的显著预测因素。教育程度以及受访者个人社交网络中是否有医疗保健专业人员或曾参与临床试验的人员是受访者此前是否曾被邀请参与临床试验的显著预测因素。结论:分析结果揭示了社会经济弱势群体,包括低收入和低教育水平群体,在临床研究中是如何被排除在外的。分析还揭示了临床试验社会影响——社交网络中有参与临床试验的家人或朋友——对参与意愿和接触临床试验的影响。

相似文献

1
The influence of socioeconomic status on individual attitudes and experience with clinical trials.社会经济地位对个体参与临床试验的态度及体验的影响。
Commun Med (Lond). 2024 Sep 5;4(1):172. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00586-9.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Public attitudes regarding willingness to participate in medical research studies.公众对参与医学研究的意愿所持的态度。
J Health Soc Policy. 2000;12(2):23-43. doi: 10.1300/J045v12n02_02.
5
Mapping Strategies for Reaching Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Populations in Clinical Trials.临床试验中针对社会经济弱势群体的入组策略。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2413962. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.13962.
6
Barriers to the participation of African-American patients with cancer in clinical trials: a pilot study.非裔美国癌症患者参与临床试验的障碍:一项试点研究。
Cancer. 2003 Mar 15;97(6):1499-506. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11213.
7
Perceptions about dementia clinical trials among underrepresented populations: A nationally representative survey of U.S. dementia caregivers.未充分代表人群对痴呆症临床试验的看法:一项对美国痴呆症护理人员的全国代表性调查。
Res Sq. 2024 Jun 14:rs.3.rs-4492550. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4492550/v1.
8
Sunscreen use and affordability attitudes based on ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and Fitzpatrick skin type.基于种族、社会经济地位和 Fitzpatrick 皮肤类型的防晒霜使用和可负担性态度。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2024 May 25;316(6):266. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-02997-z.
9
Is Our Science Representative? A Systematic Review of Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Orthopaedic Clinical Trials from 2000 to 2020.我们的科学具有代表性吗?一项针对 2000 年至 2020 年骨科临床试验中种族和民族多样性的系统评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 May 1;480(5):848-858. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002050. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
10
Consultations about randomised controlled trials are shorter and less in-depth for socioeconomically disadvantaged patients compared to socioeconomically advantaged patients: qualitative analysis across three trials.与社会经济地位较高的患者相比,社会经济地位较低的患者关于随机对照试验的咨询时间更短,也不够深入:三项试验的定性分析。
Trials. 2024 Jun 13;25(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08216-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Contraceptive choices and satisfaction: a cross-sectional analysis of sociodemographic influences.避孕选择与满意度:社会人口学影响的横断面分析
Ups J Med Sci. 2025 Jul 29;130:12656. doi: 10.48101/ujms.v130.12656. eCollection 2025.
2
Access to translated invitations online increases involvement of linguistically diverse households in a population-based study: a cluster randomized controlled study.在线获取翻译后的邀请函可提高语言多样化家庭参与基于人群的研究的程度:一项整群随机对照研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 30;15(1):27829. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12092-6.
3
Clinical and Behavioural Heterogeneity Among Women at Increased Risk for Gestational Diabetes: A Four-Country Analysis.妊娠期糖尿病风险增加的女性的临床和行为异质性:一项四国分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jun 27;22(7):1022. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22071022.
4
Demographic Composition of Participants in Sex Chromosome Aneuploidy Studies across the Globe: a 20-year Systematic Review.全球性染色体非整倍体研究参与者的人口统计学构成:一项20年的系统综述。
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 18:2025.06.17.25329799. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.17.25329799.
5
Critical Roles for Modeling and Simulation and Real-World Evidence to Inform Challenges in Clinical Trial Diversity Planning.建模与仿真以及真实世界证据在临床试验多样性规划挑战中的关键作用。
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jun;18(6):e70276. doi: 10.1111/cts.70276.
6
Public Perception of Clinical Trials and Its Predictors Among Polish Adults.波兰成年人对临床试验的公众认知及其预测因素
J Clin Med. 2025 May 8;14(10):3279. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103279.
7
A Randomized Prospective Survey to Understand Readiness for Participation in Dementia Research Studies Across Diverse Communities: Une enquête prospective à répartition aléatoire visant à comprendre la disposition à participer à des études de recherche sur la démence dans diverses communautés.一项旨在了解不同社区参与痴呆症研究意愿的随机前瞻性调查:一项随机前瞻性调查,旨在了解不同社区参与痴呆症研究的意愿。
Can J Psychiatry. 2025 May 25:7067437251343294. doi: 10.1177/07067437251343294.
8
Sustained breastfeeding associations with brain structure and cognition from late childhood to early adolescence.从儿童晚期到青少年早期,持续母乳喂养与脑结构和认知的关联。
Pediatr Res. 2025 May 17. doi: 10.1038/s41390-025-04086-x.
9
A Clinical Research Interaction Scale for Racial and Ethnic Minority Participants.针对种族和少数民族参与者的临床研究互动量表。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e259481. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.9481.
10
"VID-KIDS" Video-Feedback Interaction Guidance for Depressed Mothers and Their Infants: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.“VID-KIDS”:针对抑郁母亲及其婴儿的视频反馈互动指导:一项随机对照试验的结果
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Feb 27;15(3):279. doi: 10.3390/bs15030279.

本文引用的文献

1
Employment status, unemployment duration, and health-related metrics among US adults of prime working age: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2018-2019.美国成年人主要工作年龄段的就业状况、失业持续时间和与健康相关的指标:2018-2019 年行为风险因素监测系统。
Am J Ind Med. 2022 Jan;65(1):59-71. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23308. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
2
Reporting of Participant Race, Sex, and Socioeconomic Status in Randomized Clinical Trials in General Medical Journals, 2015 vs 2019.2015 年与 2019 年普通医学期刊随机临床试验中报告参与者种族、性别和社会经济地位的情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2111516. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11516.
3
Facilitating Clinical Trials Participation of Low Socioeconomic Status Patients.促进社会经济地位较低患者参与临床试验。
Dermatology. 2021;237(5):843-846. doi: 10.1159/000511889. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
4
Black Lives Matter movement: The time for nice words and good intentions is over.“黑人的命也是命”运动:只说漂亮话、仅有善意的时代已经结束。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2020 Sep;56(9):1327-1329. doi: 10.1111/jpc.15100.
5
Researchers Strive to Recruit Hard-Hit Minorities Into COVID-19 Vaccine Trials.研究人员努力招募受疫情重创的少数族裔参与新冠疫苗试验。
JAMA. 2020 Sep 1;324(9):826-828. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.11244.
6
COVID-19 disparities: An urgent call for race reporting and representation in clinical research.新冠病毒病差异:临床研究中种族报告与代表性的紧急呼吁。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Jul 30;19:100630. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100630. eCollection 2020 Sep.
7
Racial Disproportionality in Covid Clinical Trials.新冠临床试验中的种族不均衡现象。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 27;383(9):e59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2021971. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
8
Quantifying Patient Subpopulation Disparities in New Drugs and Biologics Approved Between 2007 and 2017.量化 2007 年至 2017 年间批准的新药和生物制剂在患者亚群中的差异。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Nov;54(6):1541-1550. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00181-9. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
9
Addressing Health Disparities Among Minority Populations: Why Clinical Trial Recruitment Is Not Enough.解决少数族裔人群中的健康差距问题:为何临床试验招募工作还不够。
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Sep 1;77(9):1063-1064. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1614.
10
COVID-19 and Racial/Ethnic Disparities.新冠病毒病与种族/民族差异
JAMA. 2020 Jun 23;323(24):2466-2467. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8598.