• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对种族和少数民族参与者的临床研究互动量表。

A Clinical Research Interaction Scale for Racial and Ethnic Minority Participants.

作者信息

Kim Jennifer Y, Botto Emily, Ford Ruby Madison

机构信息

Tufts School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development, Tufts School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e259481. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.9481.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.9481
PMID:40358951
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12076173/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Patient-staff interactions in clinical trials may influence future enrollment decisions among racial and ethnic minority patients, who remain underrepresented in clinical research. A scale that measures common patient-staff interactions encountered by racial and ethnic minority patients in clinical trials may help improve patient experience and enrollment outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a scale that measures common interactions encountered by racial and ethnic minority patients in clinical trials.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This mixed-methods survey study involved interviews and online surveys for data collection between April 1, 2023, and June 30, 2024. Adult (aged ≥18 years) racial and ethnic minority patients were interviewed to identify common interactions with research staff. The survey was validated across potential clinical trial participants and among former clinical trial participants.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Fit statistics for exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used to confirm the validity of the scale. Structural equation modeling coefficients were used to assess the validity of the scale for measuring patients' trust toward the research staff and willingness to participate in future studies.

RESULTS

The sample include 1113 participants. The scale item derivation cohort comprised 16 racial and ethnic minority participants with clinical trial experience (mean [SD] age, 44.9 [12.9] years; 10 female [62.5%]; 3 identifying as Asian or Pacific Islander [18.8%], 9 as Black [56.3%], 3 as Latino [18.8%], and 1 as multiracial [6.3%]). The scale structure validation cohort of potential clinical trial participants comprised 479 survey respondents (mean [SD] age, 35.5 [11.9] years; 219 women [45.7%]; 1 identifying as American Indian [0.2%], 59 as Asian or Pacific Islander [12.3%], 266 as Black [55.5%], 59 as Latino [12.3%], and 86 as multiracial [19.7%]). The concurrent validation cohort included 618 participants (mean [SD] age, 45.3 [16.3] years; 53% male; 63 identifying as Asian or Pacific Islander [10.2%], 228 as Black [36.9%], 75 as Latino [12.1%], 223 as White [36.1%], and 29 as multiracial [4.7%]). The 22-item Clinical Research Interaction Scale had high reliability (α = 0.96) and validity (comparative fit index, 0.92; Tucker-Lewis index, 0.91; root mean square error of approximation, 0.08). Patient experience of frequent low-quality interactions was significantly associated with lowered trust toward research staff (β, -0.56; 95% CI, -0.74 to -0.37), which in turn significantly lowered patients' willingness to return to the site for future studies (β, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70-0.90).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that low-quality interactions with research staff may reduce racial and ethnic minority patients' willingness to return for future studies, mediated by lowered trust toward the staff. The Clinical Research Interaction Scale may be a useful tool to improve the experience and enrollment outcomes for racial and ethnic minorities in clinical trials.

摘要

重要性

临床试验中的患者与工作人员互动可能会影响种族和少数族裔患者未来的入组决策,而这些患者在临床研究中的代表性仍然不足。一个衡量种族和少数族裔患者在临床试验中常见的患者与工作人员互动的量表,可能有助于改善患者体验和入组结果。

目的

开发并验证一个衡量种族和少数族裔患者在临床试验中常见互动的量表。

设计、背景和参与者:这项混合方法的调查研究包括在2023年4月1日至2024年6月30日期间进行的访谈和在线调查以收集数据。对成年(年龄≥18岁)的种族和少数族裔患者进行访谈,以确定与研究人员的常见互动。该调查在潜在的临床试验参与者和以前的临床试验参与者中进行了验证。

主要结果和测量指标

使用探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析的拟合统计量来确认量表的有效性。结构方程建模系数用于评估该量表在测量患者对研究人员的信任以及参与未来研究的意愿方面的有效性。

结果

样本包括1113名参与者。量表项目推导队列包括16名有临床试验经验的种族和少数族裔参与者(平均[标准差]年龄,44.9[12.9]岁;10名女性[62.5%];3名被认定为亚裔或太平洋岛民[18.8%],9名黑人[56.3%],3名拉丁裔[18.8%],1名多种族[6.3%])。潜在临床试验参与者的量表结构验证队列包括479名调查受访者(平均[标准差]年龄,35.5[11.9]岁;219名女性[45.7%];1名被认定为美洲印第安人[0.2%],59名亚裔或太平洋岛民[12.3%],266名黑人[55.5%],59名拉丁裔[12.3%],86名多种族[19.7%])。同时验证队列包括618名参与者(平均[标准差]年龄,45.3[16.3]岁;53%为男性;63名被认定为亚裔或太平洋岛民[10.2%],228名黑人[36.9%],75名拉丁裔[12.1%],223名白人[36.1%],29名多种族[4.7%])。22项的临床研究互动量表具有高信度(α = 0.96)和效度(比较拟合指数,0.92;塔克-刘易斯指数,0.91;近似误差均方根,0.08)。频繁经历低质量互动的患者体验与对研究人员的信任降低显著相关(β,-0.56;95%置信区间,-0.74至-0.37),这反过来又显著降低了患者返回该机构参加未来研究的意愿(β,0.80;95%置信区间,0.70 - 0.90)。

结论和相关性

这些发现表明,与研究人员的低质量互动可能会降低种族和少数族裔患者返回参加未来研究的意愿,这是由对工作人员的信任降低所介导的。临床研究互动量表可能是一个有用的工具,可改善临床试验中种族和少数族裔的体验和入组结果。

相似文献

1
A Clinical Research Interaction Scale for Racial and Ethnic Minority Participants.针对种族和少数民族参与者的临床研究互动量表。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e259481. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.9481.
2
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
3
Racial and Ethnic Minorities Underrepresented in Pain Management Guidelines for Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis.在全膝关节置换术疼痛管理指南中代表性不足的少数族裔:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1698-1706. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003026. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
4
Factors Associated with Opting Out of an Unrelated Hematopoietic Stem Cell Donor Registry: Differences and Similarities across Five Key Groups of Young Race/Ethnically Diverse Potential Donors in the United States.与选择退出无关造血干细胞捐献者登记相关的因素:美国五个关键年轻种族/族裔多样化潜在供者群体的差异和相似之处。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2024 May;30(5):512.e1-512.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.02.012. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
5
Is It Possible to Develop a Patient-reported Experience Measure With Lower Ceiling Effect?是否有可能开发一种天花板效应较低的患者报告体验测量方法?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):693-703. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003262. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
6
Racial and ethnic disparities in fecundability: a North American preconception cohort study.生育力方面的种族和族裔差异:一项北美孕前队列研究。
Hum Reprod. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf067.
7
Cultural competence education for health professionals.针对卫生专业人员的文化能力教育。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 5;2014(5):CD009405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009405.pub2.
8
Does State-Level Structural Racism Impact Risk for Suicide Ideation and Attempts Among US Adolescents Across Race and Ethnicity?州级结构性种族主义是否会影响美国不同种族和族裔青少年的自杀意念及自杀未遂风险?
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 24. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2024.09.012.
9
Do Women and Minority Orthopaedic Residents Report Experiencing Worse Well-being and More Mistreatment Than Their Peers?女性和少数族裔骨科住院医师报告的幸福感是否比同龄人更差,遭受的不当对待是否更多?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Aug 1;482(8):1325-1337. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003015. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
10
MarkVCID cerebral small vessel consortium: I. Enrollment, clinical, fluid protocols.马克 VCID 脑小血管联盟:一、入组、临床、液体方案。
Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Apr;17(4):704-715. doi: 10.1002/alz.12215. Epub 2021 Jan 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Increasing representation of Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander communities in aging, dementia, and caregiving research: An update from the CARE registry.亚裔美国人、夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民社区在衰老、痴呆症和护理研究中的代表性增加:CARE登记处的最新情况。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Apr;21(4):e70144. doi: 10.1002/alz.70144.
2
The influence of socioeconomic status on individual attitudes and experience with clinical trials.社会经济地位对个体参与临床试验的态度及体验的影响。
Commun Med (Lond). 2024 Sep 5;4(1):172. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00586-9.
3
Racial and Ethnic Inequities in US Oncology Clinical Trial Participation From 2017 to 2022.2017 年至 2022 年美国肿瘤学临床试验参与中的种族和民族不平等。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2322515. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.22515.
4
Sample size in quantitative instrument validation studies: A systematic review of articles published in Scopus, 2021.定量仪器验证研究中的样本量:对2021年发表在Scopus上的文章的系统评价
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 12;8(12):e12223. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12223. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Assessing Multiple Factors Affecting Minority Participation in Clinical Trials: Development of the Clinical Trials Participation Barriers Survey.评估影响少数群体参与临床试验的多种因素:临床试验参与障碍调查的开发
Cureus. 2022 Apr 23;14(4):e24424. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24424. eCollection 2022 Apr.
6
Racism in healthcare: a scoping review.医疗保健中的种族主义:范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 16;22(1):988. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13122-y.
7
Minority Enrollment in Phase II and III Clinical Trials in Urologic Oncology.泌尿外科肿瘤学中 II 期和 III 期临床试验的少数族裔入组情况。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 May 10;40(14):1583-1589. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01885. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
8
Discrimination experienced by Asian Canadian and Asian American health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study.在 COVID-19 大流行期间亚洲加拿大和亚洲美国医疗保健工作者所经历的歧视:一项定性研究。
CMAJ Open. 2021 Nov 16;9(4):E998-E1004. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210090. Print 2021 Oct-Dec.
9
Racial Microaggressions: Critical Questions, State of the Science, and New Directions.种族微侵犯:关键问题、科学现状与新方向。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Sep;16(5):880-885. doi: 10.1177/17456916211039209.
10
"It's Not in Your Head": Gaslighting, 'Splaining, Victim Blaming, and Other Harmful Reactions to Microaggressions.“这不是你的错”:煤气灯效应、过度解释、指责受害者以及对微侵犯的其他有害反应。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Sep;16(5):1024-1036. doi: 10.1177/17456916211011963.