Fan Ziwen, Edelmann Dominic, Yuan Tanwei, Köhler Bruno Christian, Hoffmeister Michael, Brenner Hermann
Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024 Sep 6;8(1):191. doi: 10.1038/s41698-024-00689-5.
While genome-wide association studies are valuable in identifying CRC survival predictors, the benefit of adding blood DNA methylation (blood-DNAm) to clinical features, including the TNM system, remains unclear. In a multi-site population-based patient cohort study of 2116 CRC patients with baseline blood-DNAm, we analyzed survival predictions using eXtreme Gradient Boosting with a 5-fold nested leave-sites-out cross-validation across four groups: traditional and comprehensive clinical features, blood-DNAm, and their combination. Model performance was assessed using time-dependent ROC curves and calibrations. During a median follow-up of 10.3 years, 1166 patients died. Although blood-DNAm-based predictive signatures achieved moderate performances, predictive signatures based on clinical features outperformed blood-DNAm signatures. The inclusion of blood-DNAm did not improve survival prediction over clinical features. M1 stage, age at blood collection, and N2 stage were the top contributors. Despite some prognostic value, incorporating blood DNA methylation did not enhance survival prediction of CRC patients beyond clinical features.
虽然全基因组关联研究在识别结直肠癌生存预测指标方面很有价值,但将血液DNA甲基化(血液DNAm)添加到包括TNM系统在内的临床特征中是否有益仍不清楚。在一项对2116例具有基线血液DNAm的结直肠癌患者进行的多中心基于人群的队列研究中,我们使用极端梯度提升算法,并通过在四组中进行5折嵌套留位点交叉验证来分析生存预测:传统和综合临床特征、血液DNAm及其组合。使用时间依赖的ROC曲线和校准来评估模型性能。在中位随访10.3年期间,1166例患者死亡。尽管基于血液DNAm的预测特征表现中等,但基于临床特征的预测特征优于血液DNAm特征。纳入血液DNAm并没有比临床特征更好地改善生存预测。M1期、采血年龄和N2期是主要贡献因素。尽管有一些预后价值,但纳入血液DNA甲基化并没有在临床特征之外增强结直肠癌患者的生存预测。