• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮内镜下椎间孔入路椎间盘切除术结合患者参与:更好的术后康复和满意度。

Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy with patients' participation : better postoperative rehabilitation and satisfaction.

机构信息

Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.10 Poyang Lake Road, Tianjin, 301617, People's Republic of China.

Department of Orthopedic, Chuzhou Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, No.788 Huifeng East Road, Chuzhou, 239000, Anhui, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Sep 6;19(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05043-w.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-024-05043-w
PMID:39237977
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11378537/
Abstract

OBJECT

Evaluation of the impact of patients' participation on postoperative recovery and satisfaction who underwent the Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy(PEID).

METHODS

We collected data from sixty-nine patients who underwent PEID surgery at Chuzhou Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital between January 2020 and December 2022. All patients had L5/S1 lumbar disc herniation and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patients were divided into two groups: non-communication group (n = 33) and communication group (n = 36). The division was made based on whether the patients had preoperative surgical video viewing and intraoperative communication. We compared the baseline data, surgical time, VAS score, lumbar JOA score, surgical complications, and patient satisfaction between the two groups.

RESULT

The communication group showed better pain control and functional recovery in the early postoperative period. The communication group had better VAS scores on the first day and month after surgery, as well as JOA scores on the first week and month after surgery, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in hospital stay, VAS score, JOA score, and postoperative complications between the two groups of patients at 3 and 6 months after surgery. The communication group had higher patient satisfaction (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative surgical video viewing and intraoperative communication by PEID patients can alleviate pain, accelerate functional recovery, improve symptoms, and increase patients' satisfaction. We need to do more work to develop this new model.

摘要

目的

评估患者参与经皮内窥镜下腰椎间融合术(PEID)对术后恢复和满意度的影响。

方法

我们收集了 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月在滁州市中西医结合医院接受 PEID 手术的 69 例患者的数据。所有患者均有 L5/S1 腰椎间盘突出症,符合纳入和排除标准。患者分为非沟通组(n=33)和沟通组(n=36)。分组依据是患者是否术前观看手术视频和术中沟通。我们比较了两组患者的基线资料、手术时间、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、腰椎 JOA 评分、手术并发症和患者满意度。

结果

沟通组在术后早期疼痛控制和功能恢复方面表现更好。沟通组术后第 1 天和第 1 个月的 VAS 评分以及术后第 1 周和第 1 个月的 JOA 评分均较好,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者术后 3 个月和 6 个月的住院时间、VAS 评分、JOA 评分和术后并发症无明显差异。沟通组患者满意度较高(P<0.05)。

结论

PEID 患者术前观看手术视频和术中沟通可以减轻疼痛,加速功能恢复,改善症状,提高患者满意度。我们需要进一步开展工作来完善这种新模式。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy with patients' participation : better postoperative rehabilitation and satisfaction.经皮内镜下椎间孔入路椎间盘切除术结合患者参与:更好的术后康复和满意度。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Sep 6;19(1):547. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05043-w.
2
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy via Transforaminal Approach Combined with Interlaminar Approach for L4/5 and L5/S1 Two-Level Disc Herniation.经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除术联合经椎间孔入路与经椎板间入路治疗 L4/5 和 L5/S1 双节段椎间盘突出症
Orthop Surg. 2021 May;13(3):979-988. doi: 10.1111/os.12862. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
3
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, and microdiscectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: minimum 2-year follow-up results.经皮内镜下经椎间孔椎间盘切除术、显微内镜下椎间盘切除术和显微椎间盘切除术治疗症状性腰椎间盘突出症的比较:至少2年的随访结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):317-325. doi: 10.3171/2017.6.SPINE172. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
4
Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal vs. interlaminar discectomy for L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective propensity score matching study.经皮内镜经椎间孔入路与经皮内镜椎板间入路治疗 L5-S1 腰椎间盘突出症的回顾性倾向评分匹配研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jan 13;19(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04543-z.
5
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Muscle Invasiveness between Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy and Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation at L5/S1 Level.单侧双通道内镜下腰椎间盘切除术与经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗 L5/S1 水平腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效及肌肉侵袭性比较。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Mar;15(3):695-703. doi: 10.1111/os.13627. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
6
Comparison of Interlaminar and Transforaminal Approaches for Treatment of L /S Disc Herniation by Percutaneous Endoscopic Discectomy.经皮内窥镜椎间盘切除术治疗 L/S 椎间盘突出症的经椎间孔入路与经椎间孔入路的比较。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Feb;13(1):63-70. doi: 10.1111/os.12831. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
7
Comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy between transforaminal and interlaminar approach: a minimum two year follow-up.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗经椎间孔入路与经皮入路的患者报告结局的比较分析:至少两年的随访。
Int Orthop. 2023 Nov;47(11):2835-2841. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05935-2. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
8
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy and conventional open lumbar discectomy for L4/5 and L5/S1 double-segmental lumbar disk herniation.对比经皮内镜下椎板间入路腰椎间盘切除术与传统开放腰椎间盘切除术治疗 L4/5 和 L5/S1 双节段腰椎间盘突出症。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Dec 11;18(1):950. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04361-9.
9
A Cost-utility Analysis of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for L5-S1 Lumbar Disc Herniation: Transforaminal versus Interlaminar.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗 L5-S1 腰椎间盘突出症的成本效用分析:经椎间孔入路与经皮入路。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Apr 15;44(8):563-570. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002901.
10
Different approaches to percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for L5/S1 lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study.不同方法经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗 L5/S1 腰椎间盘突出症:一项回顾性研究。
Br J Neurosurg. 2024 Feb;38(1):16-22. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2020.1861218. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Letter: effects of dexamethasone combined with vitamin B12 on percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy early outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.信函:地塞米松联合维生素B12对经皮内镜下椎间孔切开椎间盘切除术早期疗效的影响:一项随机对照试验
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Mar 12;20(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05462-3.
2
Efficacy of acupuncture for lumbar disc herniation: changes in paravertebral muscle and fat infiltration - a multicenter retrospective cohort study.针刺治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效:椎旁肌和脂肪浸润的变化——一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Nov 6;15:1467769. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1467769. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of transforaminal approach spinal endoscopy in the treatment of patients with lumbar disc herniation and the factors affecting its efficacy.经椎间孔入路脊柱内镜治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效及影响其疗效的因素
Am J Transl Res. 2024 May 15;16(5):1779-1789. doi: 10.62347/HFAP6601. eCollection 2024.
2
Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal vs. interlaminar discectomy for L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective propensity score matching study.经皮内镜经椎间孔入路与经皮内镜椎板间入路治疗 L5-S1 腰椎间盘突出症的回顾性倾向评分匹配研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jan 13;19(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04543-z.
3
Treatment Satisfaction, Efficacy, and Tolerability of Low-Dose Diclofenac Epolamine Soft Capsules in Acute, Mild, or Moderate Musculoskeletal Pain: A Prospective Open-Label, Single-Arm Interventional Study.低剂量双氯芬酸乙胺软胶囊治疗急性、轻度或中度肌肉骨骼疼痛的治疗满意度、疗效及耐受性:一项前瞻性开放标签、单臂干预研究
Pain Ther. 2023 Oct;12(5):1149-1163. doi: 10.1007/s40122-023-00531-z. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
4
Complications and Management of Endoscopic Spinal Surgery.脊柱内镜手术的并发症与处理
Neurospine. 2023 Mar;20(1):56-77. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346226.113. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
5
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Muscle Invasiveness between Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy and Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation at L5/S1 Level.单侧双通道内镜下腰椎间盘切除术与经皮椎间孔镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗 L5/S1 水平腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效及肌肉侵袭性比较。
Orthop Surg. 2023 Mar;15(3):695-703. doi: 10.1111/os.13627. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
6
Comparison of Three Common Intervertebral Disc Discectomies in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Based on Multiple Data.三种常见椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:基于多数据的系统评价和Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 8;11(22):6604. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226604.
7
Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for L5-S1 calcified lumbar disc herniation: A retrospective study.经皮内镜下L5-S1节段钙化腰椎间盘突出症椎间孔切开术:一项回顾性研究
Front Surg. 2022 Sep 23;9:998231. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.998231. eCollection 2022.
8
Participation of patients during arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is conducive to postoperative rehabilitation and satisfaction: a single-center retrospective study.患者在关节镜下半月板部分切除术的参与有利于术后康复和满意度:单中心回顾性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Sep 2;23(1):832. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05778-9.
9
Citation analysis of the 100 top-cited articles on discectomy via endoscopy since 2011 using alluvial diagrams: bibliometric analysis.2011 年以来经内镜椎间盘切除术 100 篇高引文献的引文分析:文献计量学分析。
Eur J Med Res. 2022 Sep 1;27(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00782-0.
10
Transforaminal Versus Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经椎间孔与椎板间内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Global Spine J. 2023 Mar;13(2):575-587. doi: 10.1177/21925682221120530. Epub 2022 Aug 21.