Suppr超能文献

严重创伤性脑损伤中的体外膜肺氧合:它安全吗?

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe traumatic brain injury: Is it safe?

作者信息

Rafaqat Wardah, Luckoski John, Lagazzi Emanuele, Abiad May, Panossian Vahe, Nzenwa Ikemsinachi, Kaafarani Haytham M A, Hwabejire John O, Renne Benjamin C

机构信息

From the Division of Trauma, Emergency General Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2025 Jan 1;98(1):135-144. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004421. Epub 2024 Sep 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) are at an increased risk of respiratory failure refractory to traditional therapies. The safety of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in this population remains unclear. We aimed to examine outcomes following ECMO compared with traditional management in severe TBI patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study using the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2017-2020). We identified patients 18 years or older with severe TBI (Abbreviated Injury Score head, ≥3) who underwent ECMO or had either in-hospital cardiac or acute respiratory distress syndrome during their hospitalization. The study excluded pPatients who arrived without signs of life, had a prehospital cardiac arrest, had an unsurvivable injury, were transferred out within 48 hours of arrival, or were received as a transfer and died within 12 hours of arrival Patients with missing information regarding in-hospital mortality were also excluded. Outcomes included mortality, in-hospital complications, and intensive care unit length of stay. To account for patient and injury characteristics, we used 1:1 propensity matching. We performed a subgroup analysis among ECMO patients, comparing patients who received anticoagulants with those who did not.

RESULTS

We identified 10,065 patients, of whom 221 (2.2%) underwent ECMO. In the propensity-matched sample of 134 pairs, there was no difference in mortality. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was associated with a higher incidence of cerebrovascular accidents (9% vs. 1%, p = 0.006) and a lower incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. In the subgroup analysis of 64 matched pairs, patients receiving anticoagulation had lower mortality, higher unplanned return to the operating room, and longer duration of ventilation and intensive care unit length of stay.

CONCLUSION

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use in severe TBI patients was not associated with higher mortality and should be considered a potential intervention in this patient population. Systemic anticoagulation showed mortality benefit, but further work is required to elucidate the impact on neurological outcomes, and the appropriate dosing and timing of anticoagulation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

摘要

背景

重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者发生对传统治疗无效的呼吸衰竭风险增加。体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)在该人群中的安全性尚不清楚。我们旨在比较重度TBI患者接受ECMO治疗与传统治疗后的结局。

方法

我们使用创伤质量改进计划(2017 - 2020年)进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们确定了18岁及以上的重度TBI患者(简明损伤定级标准头部评分≥3),这些患者接受了ECMO治疗,或在住院期间发生院内心脏骤停或急性呼吸窘迫综合征。研究排除了无生命体征到达的患者、院前心脏骤停患者、有不可存活损伤的患者、到达后48小时内转出的患者,或作为转院接收且到达后12小时内死亡的患者。缺失院内死亡率相关信息的患者也被排除。结局包括死亡率、院内并发症和重症监护病房住院时间。为了考虑患者和损伤特征,我们采用了1:1倾向匹配。我们对接受ECMO治疗的患者进行了亚组分析,比较接受抗凝治疗的患者和未接受抗凝治疗的患者。

结果

我们确定了10,065例患者,其中221例(2.2%)接受了ECMO治疗。在134对倾向匹配样本中,死亡率无差异。体外膜肺氧合与脑血管意外发生率较高(9%对1%,p = 0.006)和呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率较低相关。在64对匹配对子的亚组分析中,接受抗凝治疗的患者死亡率较低,非计划重返手术室的比例较高,通气时间和重症监护病房住院时间较长。

结论

重度TBI患者使用体外膜肺氧合与较高死亡率无关,应被视为该患者群体的一种潜在干预措施。全身抗凝显示出对死亡率的益处,但需要进一步研究以阐明其对神经学结局的影响以及抗凝的合适剂量和时机。

证据水平

治疗/护理管理;三级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验