Cassidy P G, Triplett D A, LaDuca F M
Am J Clin Pathol. 1985 Jun;83(6):697-706. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/83.6.697.
The agarose gel method for the detection and quantitation of Factor VIII inhibitors was investigated and compared with the Bethesda method. The agarose gel method was standardized for this study by modifications of the original method of Bird. (Bird P: Coagulation in an agarose gel and its application to the detection and measurement of factor VIII antibodies. Br J Haematol 1975; 29:329-340) Precision studies on values obtained by the agarose gel method indicated it is a reproducible assay. Random error was evident in both methods, but variance appeared to be greater in the Bethesda method for most of the samples evaluated. Comparison of the two methods with split patient samples indicated that proportional error is present in the agarose gel method, and that standardization of the method requires additional study. The agarose gel assay detected low levels of inhibitor (down to 3.4 Bethesda units) and all positive samples were identified. A screening procedure modification of the agarose gel method provided the sensitivity to detect Factor VIII inhibitor levels of less than 1.0 Bethesda units. The results indicated that the agarose gel method is a feasible alternative to the Bethesda method for both quantitative and qualitative determination of Factor VIII inhibitors. Furthermore, since reproducibility is better, it may be useful in detecting the "true" fluctuations of inhibitor titers in a given patient.
对用于检测和定量因子VIII抑制剂的琼脂糖凝胶法进行了研究,并与贝塞斯达法进行了比较。本研究通过对Bird原始方法的改进对琼脂糖凝胶法进行了标准化。(Bird P:琼脂糖凝胶中的凝血及其在因子VIII抗体检测和测量中的应用。《英国血液学杂志》1975年;29:329 - 340)对琼脂糖凝胶法获得的值进行的精密度研究表明,它是一种可重复的检测方法。两种方法均存在随机误差,但在评估的大多数样本中,贝塞斯达法的方差似乎更大。对分割患者样本的两种方法进行比较表明,琼脂糖凝胶法存在比例误差,该方法的标准化需要进一步研究。琼脂糖凝胶检测法可检测到低水平的抑制剂(低至3.4贝塞斯达单位),且所有阳性样本均被识别。对琼脂糖凝胶法的一种筛选程序改进提供了检测低于1.0贝塞斯达单位的因子VIII抑制剂水平的灵敏度。结果表明,琼脂糖凝胶法在因子VIII抑制剂的定量和定性测定方面是贝塞斯达法的一种可行替代方法。此外,由于重现性更好,它可能有助于检测特定患者中抑制剂滴度的“真实”波动。