Suppr超能文献

私人诊所中宫内节育器的长期使用情况。

Long-term use of intrauterine contraceptive devices in a private practice.

作者信息

Sandmire H F, Cavanaugh R A

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985 May 15;152(2):169-75. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(85)80018-1.

Abstract

Clinical experience with 1504 insertions of intrauterine contraceptive devices (Lippes Loop, Dalkon Shield, Cu-7) in a private practice is evaluated. Expulsion rates and removal rates for bleeding and/or pain and personal reasons differed for the three types of devices. Pregnancy rates associated with use of the three types of devices were similar. Pelvic inflammatory disease rates were similar for Dalkon Shield and Cu-7 users but were higher than the rate for Lippes Loop users. Use of intrauterine contraceptive devices did not appear to compromise future fertility based on the experience of women who had the devices removed. The study shows that long-term IUD use (up to 5 years) provides a safe and effective method of contraception.

摘要

评估了在私人诊所进行的1504例宫内节育器(利普斯环、达康盾、铜7)置入的临床经验。三种类型的节育器在因出血和/或疼痛以及个人原因导致的排出率和取出率方面存在差异。与使用这三种类型节育器相关的妊娠率相似。达康盾和铜7使用者的盆腔炎发病率相似,但高于利普斯环使用者。根据取出节育器的女性的经验,使用宫内节育器似乎不会损害未来的生育能力。该研究表明,长期使用宫内节育器(长达5年)提供了一种安全有效的避孕方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验