Hasson H M
Adv Contracept. 1985 Mar;1(1):51-61. doi: 10.1007/BF01849144.
Clinical experience with intrauterine devices was evaluated, based on 627 insertions over a 14-year period in a private practice. Overall, there were few differences in the event rates leading to IUD discontinuation for the IUDs evaluated, principally Cu-7, Dalkon Shield and Lippes Loop. Pelvic infections were infrequent (0.7-2.2 cases per 100 woman-years of IUD use). The rate of PID in the study population appeared to be similar to that noted in the general population. IUD use did not appear to compromise future fertility, based on evaluations of patients after removal of their IUDs or from their return to fertility following IUD removal. IUD event rates (pregnancy, expulsion, displacement, removal for bleeding and/or pain) were related to the difference between endometrial cavity length and IUD length. A significant increase in the event rates was noted, regardless of the IUD type, when the endometrial cavity length exceeded IUD length by 2.0 cm or more, or when the difference between the endometrial cavity and IUD length was less than 0.5 cm.
基于一家私人诊所14年间627例宫内节育器(IUD)置入的情况,对IUD的临床经验进行了评估。总体而言,所评估的IUD(主要是Cu-7、达康盾和利普斯环)导致IUD停用的事件发生率差异不大。盆腔感染很少见(每100名妇女使用IUD的年数中发生0.7 - 2.2例)。研究人群中盆腔炎(PID)的发生率似乎与普通人群中所观察到的相似。根据对取出IUD后的患者的评估,或根据她们在取出IUD后恢复生育能力的情况来看,使用IUD似乎不会损害未来的生育能力。IUD的事件发生率(妊娠、排出、移位、因出血和/或疼痛而取出)与子宫内膜腔长度和IUD长度之间的差异有关。当子宫内膜腔长度超过IUD长度2.0厘米或更多,或者当子宫内膜腔与IUD长度之间的差异小于0.5厘米时,无论IUD类型如何,事件发生率均显著增加。