• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Emergency Department Versus Primary Care Use: A Patient Perspective.急诊科与初级保健机构的使用:患者视角
PRiMER. 2024 Aug 12;8:44. doi: 10.22454/PRiMER.2024.526921. eCollection 2024.
2
One Stop: Examining the Reasons Patients Use the Emergency Department for Nonurgent Care and the Barriers They Face.一站式:探究患者因非紧急情况而使用急诊部的原因和他们所面临的障碍。
J Emerg Nurs. 2020 Mar;46(2):163-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2019.08.007. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
3
Seeking care for nonurgent medical conditions in the emergency department: through the eyes of the patient.在急诊科寻求非紧急医疗状况的护理:从患者的视角来看
J Emerg Nurs. 2000 Dec;26(6):554-63. doi: 10.1067/men.2000.110904.
4
Pediatric non-urgent emergency department visits and prior care-seeking at primary care.儿科非紧急急诊就诊和初级保健的前期寻医。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 17;21(1):466. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06480-7.
5
Why do parents bring children to the emergency department for nonurgent conditions? A qualitative study.为什么父母会因非紧急情况带孩子去急诊科?一项定性研究。
Ambul Pediatr. 2008 Nov-Dec;8(6):360-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2008.07.001. Epub 2008 Oct 5.
6
Nonurgent emergency department patient characteristics and barriers to primary care.非紧急情况的急诊科患者特征及初级保健的障碍
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Dec;11(12):1302-10. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.032.
7
Enhancing Value-Based Care With a Walk-in Clinic: A Primary Care Provider Intervention to Decrease Low Acuity Emergency Department Overutilization.通过便捷诊所提升基于价值的医疗服务:一项初级保健提供者干预措施以减少低急症急诊科过度使用情况
Cureus. 2021 Feb 11;13(2):e13284. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13284.
8
Use of an emergency department by nonurgent patients.非急症患者使用急诊科的情况。
Am J Emerg Med. 2005 Mar;23(2):131-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2004.05.006.
9
The influence of personal communities in understanding avoidable emergency department attendance: qualitative study.理解可避免急诊就诊的个人社区影响:定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 21;20(1):887. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05705-5.
10
Older patients' perspectives on factors contributing to frequent visits to the emergency department: a qualitative interview study.老年患者对导致频繁急诊就诊因素的看法:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 20;21(1):1709. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11755-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging LLM to identify missed information in patient-physician communication: improving healthcare service quality.利用大语言模型识别医患沟通中遗漏的信息:提高医疗服务质量。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 1;12:1631565. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1631565. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Emergency Department Overcrowding: Understanding the Factors to Find Corresponding Solutions.急诊科拥挤:了解相关因素以寻求相应解决方案。
J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 14;12(2):279. doi: 10.3390/jpm12020279.
2
Demographic factors influencing nonurgent emergency department utilization among a Medicaid population.影响医疗补助人群非紧急急诊科就诊率的人口统计学因素。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2017 Sep;20(3):395-402. doi: 10.1007/s10729-016-9360-8. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
3
Return visits to the emergency department: the patient perspective.急诊科复诊:患者视角
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;65(4):377-386.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.07.015. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
4
Predicting the likelihood of emergency admission to hospital of older people: development and validation of the Emergency Admission Risk Likelihood Index (EARLI).预测老年人紧急入院的可能性:紧急入院风险可能性指数(EARLI)的开发与验证。
Fam Pract. 2007 Apr;24(2):158-67. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cml069. Epub 2007 Jan 8.
5
Emergency room use and access to primary care: evidence from Houston, Texas.急诊室的使用情况及初级医疗服务的可及性:来自德克萨斯州休斯顿的证据
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2006 Aug;17(3):610-24. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2006.0098.
6
What accounts for differences in the use of hospital emergency departments across U.S. communities?美国不同社区在医院急诊科使用方面存在差异的原因是什么?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Sep-Oct;25(5):w324-36. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.w324. Epub 2006 Jul 18.
7
ED utilization: the effect of changing demographics from 1992 to 2000.急诊室利用率:1992年至2000年人口结构变化的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2002 Nov;20(7):583-7. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2002.35462.
8
Nonurgent use of the emergency department: appropriate or not?急诊科的非紧急使用:是否合适?
Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Nov;24(5):953-7. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70213-6.

急诊科与初级保健机构的使用:患者视角

Emergency Department Versus Primary Care Use: A Patient Perspective.

作者信息

Wu Natasha, Woloski Jason R

机构信息

Geisinger Health System, Wilkes Barre, PA.

Geisinger Health System, Wilkes Barre, PA | Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Wilkes Barre, PA.

出版信息

PRiMER. 2024 Aug 12;8:44. doi: 10.22454/PRiMER.2024.526921. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.22454/PRiMER.2024.526921
PMID:39238490
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11377075/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

When faced with an acute illness, patients routinely make the decision of whether to present to their primary care physician (PCP) or the emergency department (ED). While the ED is known to be a high-cost component of the health care system, many ED visits include nonurgent ailments that could easily be treated within the medical home/primary care office. Particularly for patients who have an established PCP, the factors driving a preference for ED use remain poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to better understand patient motivation for visiting the ED rather than the PCP office.

METHODS

This observational study aimed to take a qualitative look at the patient population using a health system ED in the city of Wilkes Barre, PA, from December 2021 to March 2022. We conducted 30 interviews of patients who recently visited the ED and analyzed the responses for recurring themes.

RESULTS

Major themes included the benefit of the PCP-patient relationship, patients' preference for multiple sources of medical guidance, patients' subjectively justifying their symptoms as emergent, seeking emergent care despite perception of higher cost, and factoring in time spent at a health care facility waiting for answers.

CONCLUSIONS

This study contributes to further understanding of the values that drive ED use by using patient voice as a powerful tool to understand communities and local trends, which will allow health care systems to adapt and personalize protocols to their specific population.

摘要

引言

面对急性疾病时,患者通常要决定是去看初级保健医生(PCP)还是去急诊科(ED)。虽然急诊科是医疗保健系统中成本较高的组成部分,但许多急诊就诊包含的非紧急疾病在家庭医疗/初级保健办公室就可以轻松治疗。特别是对于已有初级保健医生的患者,促使他们更倾向于去急诊科就诊的因素仍知之甚少。本研究的目的是更好地了解患者前往急诊科而非初级保健医生办公室就诊的动机。

方法

这项观察性研究旨在对2021年12月至2022年3月期间在宾夕法尼亚州威尔克斯-巴里市使用某医疗系统急诊科的患者群体进行定性研究。我们对最近去过急诊科的患者进行了30次访谈,并分析了回答中反复出现 的主题。

结果

主要主题包括初级保健医生与患者关系的益处、患者对多种医疗指导来源的偏好、患者主观地将自己的症状判定为紧急情况、尽管意识到费用较高仍寻求紧急护理,以及考虑在医疗机构等待答案所花费的时间。

结论

本研究通过将患者的声音作为理解社区和当地趋势的有力工具,有助于进一步理解促使患者前往急诊科就诊的因素,这将使医疗保健系统能够根据其特定人群调整并个性化诊疗方案。