文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

An assessment of the minimal clinically important difference for the pain disability quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Spine.

作者信息

Amatto Alycia, Smith Ashley, Pan Bo, Al Hamarneh Yazid, Burnham Taylor, Burnham Robert

机构信息

Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Vivo Cura Health, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Interv Pain Med. 2022 Jul 8;1(3):100116. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100116. eCollection 2022 Sep.


DOI:10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100116
PMID:39238520
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11372947/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Pain Disability Quality-Of-Life Questionnaire-Spine (PDQQ-S) is a validated six question patient reported outcome measure designed for usage in minimally invasive spine intervention. The purpose of this study was to determine the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for the PDQQ-S. DESIGN: Retrospective single arm cohort study involving 411 patients who had undergone lumbar facet and/or sacroiliac joint RFN and had completed pre-and 3-month post RFN PDQQ-S. METHODS: The MCID using both distribution and anchor-based ("Rebook RFN"; "Analgesic Requirements") methods were calculated. RESULTS: The distribution-based approach (using standard error of measurement) estimated the MCID to be -17.3 [PDQQ-S baseline mean (SD): 46.9 (7.9)]. This is supported by the anchor based approach, which calculated the MCID to be: -21.5 for rebook RFN; -11.3, -17.2 and -30.5 for mildly, moderately and dramatically decreased NSAID use respectively; and -11.7, -16.9 and -31.7 for mildly, moderately and dramatically decreased opioid use respectively. A moderate reduction in medication use was deemed to be clinically relevant. CONCLUSION: The MCID value for the PDQQ-S is a score reduction of 17.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4cb/11372947/2ea994b538ae/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4cb/11372947/2ea994b538ae/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4cb/11372947/2ea994b538ae/fx1.jpg

相似文献

[1]
An assessment of the minimal clinically important difference for the pain disability quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Spine.

Interv Pain Med. 2022-7-8

[2]
The effectiveness and predictive factors of Sacroiliac Joint Radiofrequency Neurotomy success - A retrospective cohort study.

Interv Pain Med. 2023-8-8

[3]
An assessment of the validity and responsiveness of the Numerical Rating Scale version of the Pain Disability Quality-Of-Life Questionnaire-Spine.

Interv Pain Med. 2022-3-25

[4]
An assessment of a short composite questionnaire designed for use in an interventional spine pain management setting.

PM R. 2012-6

[5]
Discordance Abounds in Minimum Clinically Important Differences in THA: A Systematic Review.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023-4-1

[6]
Patient-reported outcomes after minimally invasive sacro-iliac joint surgery: a cohort study based on the Swedish Spine Registry.

Acta Orthop. 2024-6-14

[7]
What Is the Clinical Benefit of Common Orthopaedic Procedures as Assessed by the PROMIS Versus Other Validated Outcomes Tools?

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022-9-1

[8]
What Are the MCIDs for PROMIS, NDI, and ODI Instruments Among Patients With Spinal Conditions?

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018-10

[9]
Minimal clinically important difference in patients who underwent decompression alone for lumbar degenerative disease.

Spine J. 2022-4

[10]
Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2011-2-18

引用本文的文献

[1]
What is the optimal block selection paradigm for predicting a successful treatment outcome following sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy? A real-world cohort study.

Interv Pain Med. 2025-6-2

[2]
A retrospective single arm cohort study evaluating the efficacy of lumbar medial branch radiofrequency ablation using a multi-tined probe and perpendicular approach.

Interv Pain Med. 2025-3-29

[3]
The effectiveness of cervical medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy using a perpendicular approach with a three-tined probe: A single-arm, retrospective cohort study.

Interv Pain Med. 2025-3-19

[4]
Evaluating prognostic block selection criteria in cervical medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy: A retrospective cohort study.

Interv Pain Med. 2025-3-19

[5]
The effectiveness of thoracic medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy using a three-tined electrode: A single-arm, retrospective cohort study.

Interv Pain Med. 2025-3-1

[6]
The effectiveness of sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy for posterior sacroiliac joint complex pain in patients selected by dual sacral lateral branch blocks; A real-world cohort study.

Interv Pain Med. 2024-10-30

[7]
A description and outcome evaluation of sacrococcygeal joint radiofrequency neurotomy for treatment of chronic coccydynia - A dorsal approach.

Interv Pain Med. 2024-8-10

本文引用的文献

[1]
Determining the Minimal Clinical Important Difference for Medication Quantification Scale III and Morphine Milligram Equivalents in Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome.

J Clin Med. 2020-11-21

[2]
Commentary: Statistical significance and clinical significance - A call to consider patient reported outcome measures, effect size, confidence interval and minimal clinically important difference (MCID).

J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019-10

[3]
Statistics In Brief: Minimum Clinically Important Difference-Availability of Reliable Estimates.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017-4

[4]
Minimum Clinically Important Difference: Current Trends in the Spine Literature.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017-7-15

[5]
The impact of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice for pain: a systematic review.

Qual Life Res. 2017-2

[6]
Approaches for estimating minimal clinically important differences in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Arthritis Res Ther. 2015-6-3

[7]
Determining the clinical importance of treatment benefits for interventions for painful orthopedic conditions.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2015-2-3

[8]
Beyond statistical significance: clinical interpretation of rehabilitation research literature.

Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014-10

[9]
An assessment of a short composite questionnaire designed for use in an interventional spine pain management setting.

PM R. 2012-6

[10]
Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale.

Pain. 2001-11

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索