• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骶髂关节射频神经切断术成功的有效性及预测因素——一项回顾性队列研究

The effectiveness and predictive factors of Sacroiliac Joint Radiofrequency Neurotomy success - A retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Amatto Alycia, Burnham Taylor, Teramoto Masaru, Burnham Robert

机构信息

Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

University of Utah, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

出版信息

Interv Pain Med. 2023 Aug 8;2(3):100271. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100271. eCollection 2023 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100271
PMID:39238916
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11372946/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Sacroiliac Joint (SIJ) accounts for 10-27% of lower back pain. Radiofrequency neurotomy (RFN) is commonly utilized for refractory pain. Outcomes are variable and may be related to patient selection and procedural technique differences.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness and outcome success predictors of SIJ RFN at three months.

DESIGN/METHODS: Data of patients undergoing SIJ RFN were extracted from the electronic medical record of one physiatrist's interventional pain practice between 2016 and 2021. The extracted data included the following outcome variables: ≥2 decrease in Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) [minimal clinically important difference MCID-2], ≥50% NRS reduction, and ≥17 points decrease in the Pain Disability and Quality of Life Questionnaire - Spine (PDQQ-S) [MCID]. Predictor variables included block type [>79% LBB/LBB, >79% IA/LBB, 50-79% LBB/LBB, 50-79% IA/LBB, >79% LBB, and 50-79% LBB] and cannula type/configuration [16 g/longitudinal, Trident bipolar/perpendicular, and 18 g quadripolar/perpendicular]. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and logistic regression with an odds ratio (OR). Covariates included in the logistic regression models were age, gender, and laterality (right, left, and bilateral).

RESULTS

Of the 128 patients analyzed for this study (20.8% males; 60.4 ± 14.4 years of age), 66.9% achieved MCID-2 in NRS, 53.9% experienced ≥50% NRS reduction, and 50% experienced ≥17 points decrease in PDQQ-S. Achieving MCID-2 in NRS for the 18 g quadripolar/perpendicular technique was approximately four times higher than the odds for 16 g/longitudinal technique (OR = 3.91; 95% CI = 1.34-11.43;  = 0.013). Block type was not significantly associated with any outcome variable after adjusting for cannula type and other covariates ( > 0.05). Younger age was significantly associated with achieving MCID-2 in NRS, ≥50% NRS reduction, and ≥17 points decrease in PDQQ ( = 0.034, 0.020, and 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSION

SIJ RFN effectively reduces pain and improves function in most patients at three months. Quadripolar/perpendicular technique and younger age predict SIJ RFN treatment success, whereas block type does not.

摘要

背景

骶髂关节(SIJ)导致的下背部疼痛占比为10%-27%。射频神经切断术(RFN)常用于治疗顽固性疼痛。其治疗效果存在差异,可能与患者选择及手术技术差异有关。

目的

评估骶髂关节射频神经切断术在三个月时的有效性及预后成功预测因素。

设计/方法:从一位物理治疗师2016年至2021年介入性疼痛治疗实践的电子病历中提取接受骶髂关节射频神经切断术患者的数据。提取的数据包括以下结局变量:数字评定量表(NRS)降低≥2分[最小临床重要差异MCID-2]、NRS降低≥50%,以及疼痛残疾与生活质量问卷-脊柱版(PDQQ-S)降低≥17分[MCID]。预测变量包括阻滞类型[>79%腰大肌阻滞/腰大肌阻滞、>79%髂腹下神经阻滞/腰大肌阻滞、50%-79%腰大肌阻滞/腰大肌阻滞、50%-79%髂腹下神经阻滞/腰大肌阻滞、>79%腰大肌阻滞和50%-79%腰大肌阻滞]和套管类型/配置[16g/纵向、三叉戟双极/垂直和18g四极/垂直]。数据分析包括描述性统计和采用优势比(OR)的逻辑回归。逻辑回归模型中纳入的协变量包括年龄、性别和侧别(右侧、左侧和双侧)。

结果

本研究分析的128例患者中(20.8%为男性;年龄60.4±14.4岁),66.9%的患者NRS达到MCID-2,53.9%的患者NRS降低≥50%,50%的患者PDQQ-S降低≥17分。18g四极/垂直技术在NRS中达到MCID-2的几率约为16g/纵向技术的四倍(OR=3.91;95%CI=1.34-11.43;P=0.013)。在调整套管类型和其他协变量后,阻滞类型与任何结局变量均无显著相关性(P>0.05)。年龄较小与NRS达到MCID-2、NRS降低≥50%以及PDQQ降低≥17分显著相关(分别为P=0.034、0.020和0.002)。

结论

骶髂关节射频神经切断术在三个月时能有效减轻大多数患者的疼痛并改善功能。四极/垂直技术和较年轻的年龄可预测骶髂关节射频神经切断术治疗成功,而阻滞类型则不能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfe4/11372946/57de79597ff2/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfe4/11372946/28c60a7ee03c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfe4/11372946/97b8dec62a8c/gr2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfe4/11372946/57de79597ff2/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfe4/11372946/28c60a7ee03c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfe4/11372946/97b8dec62a8c/gr2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cfe4/11372946/57de79597ff2/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
The effectiveness and predictive factors of Sacroiliac Joint Radiofrequency Neurotomy success - A retrospective cohort study.骶髂关节射频神经切断术成功的有效性及预测因素——一项回顾性队列研究
Interv Pain Med. 2023 Aug 8;2(3):100271. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100271. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
The Effects of Radiofrequency Neurotomy Using a Strip-Lesioning Device on Patients with Sacroiliac Joint Pain: Results from a Single-Center, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial.采用条状损伤装置的射频神经切断术对骶髂关节疼痛患者的影响:来自单中心、随机、假对照试验的结果。
Pain Physician. 2018 Nov;21(6):607-618.
3
A Retrospective Analysis of Sacroiliac Joint Pain Interventions: Intraarticular Steroid Injection and Lateral Branch Radiofrequency Neurotomy.骶髂关节疼痛干预措施的回顾性分析:关节内注射类固醇与外侧支射频神经切断术
Pain Physician. 2022 Mar;25(2):E341-E347.
4
An assessment of the minimal clinically important difference for the pain disability quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Spine.疼痛残疾生活质量问卷-脊柱的最小临床重要差异评估。
Interv Pain Med. 2022 Jul 8;1(3):100116. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100116. eCollection 2022 Sep.
5
Ultrasound-guided radiofrequency Ablation for SI joint pain:An observational study.超声引导下射频消融治疗骶髂关节疼痛:一项观察性研究。
Interv Pain Med. 2022 Jul 14;1(3):100118. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100118. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Assessment of technical adequacy of sacral lateral branches cooled radiofrequency neurotomy.骶外侧支冷却射频神经切断术技术充分性评估
Interv Pain Med. 2022 Feb 17;1(1):100069. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100069. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
An assessment of the validity and responsiveness of the Numerical Rating Scale version of the Pain Disability Quality-Of-Life Questionnaire-Spine.疼痛残疾生活质量问卷-脊柱数字评定量表版本的有效性及反应度评估。
Interv Pain Med. 2022 Mar 25;1(2):100087. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100087. eCollection 2022 Jun.
8
Successful Thermal Neurotomy of the Painful Sacroiliac Ligament/Joint Complex-A Comparison of Two Techniques.成功的骶髂韧带/关节复合体热神经切断术——两种技术的比较。
Pain Med. 2020 Mar 1;21(3):561-569. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz282.
9
What Preoperative Factors are Associated With Not Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference After THA? Findings from an International Multicenter Study.哪些术前因素与 THA 后未达到最小临床重要差异有关?一项国际多中心研究的结果。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jun;477(6):1301-1312. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000667.
10
'Simplicity' radiofrequency neurotomy of sacroiliac joint: a real life 1-year follow-up UK data.骶髂关节“简易”射频神经切断术:英国真实的1年随访数据
Br J Pain. 2016 May;10(2):90-9. doi: 10.1177/2049463715627287. Epub 2016 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
What is the optimal block selection paradigm for predicting a successful treatment outcome following sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy? A real-world cohort study.预测骶外侧支射频神经切断术后成功治疗结果的最佳阻滞选择模式是什么?一项真实世界队列研究。
Interv Pain Med. 2025 Jun 2;4(2):100599. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100599. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
A Retrospective Analysis of Sacroiliac Joint Pain Interventions: Intraarticular Steroid Injection and Lateral Branch Radiofrequency Neurotomy.骶髂关节疼痛干预措施的回顾性分析:关节内注射类固醇与外侧支射频神经切断术
Pain Physician. 2022 Mar;25(2):E341-E347.
2
Evaluation of an Ultrasound-Assisted Longitudinal Axis Lateral Crest Approach to Radiofrequency Ablation of the Sacroiliac Joint.超声辅助纵向轴外侧嵴入路经皮射频消融治疗骶髂关节的评估。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Jan 1;101(1):26-31. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001733.
3
Sacroiliac Joint Diagnostic Block and Radiofrequency Ablation Techniques.
骶髂关节诊断性阻滞与射频消融技术
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2021 Nov;32(4):725-744. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2021.05.008. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
4
Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Posterior Sacroiliac Joint Complex Pain: A Comprehensive Review.射频消融治疗慢性骶髂关节复合体疼痛:全面综述。
Pain Med. 2021 Jul 25;22(Suppl 1):S9-S13. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab021.
5
A comparison of efficacy among different radiofrequency ablation techniques for the treatment of lumbar facet joint and sacroiliac joint pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.不同射频消融技术治疗腰椎小关节和骶髂关节疼痛的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Aug;195:105854. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105854. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
6
Radiofrequency neurotomy in chronic lumbar and sacroiliac joint pain: A meta-analysis.慢性腰和骶髂关节疼痛的射频神经切断术:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(26):e16230. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016230.
7
Retrospective cohort study of healthcare utilization and opioid use following radiofrequency ablation for chronic axial spine pain in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省慢性轴性脊柱疼痛患者接受射频消融术后医疗服务利用情况及阿片类药物使用情况的回顾性队列研究。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Mar;44(3):398-405. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100058. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
8
The efficacy and safety of using cooled radiofrequency in treating chronic sacroiliac joint pain: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.使用冷却射频治疗慢性骶髂关节疼痛的疗效和安全性:一项符合PRISMA标准的Meta分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb;97(6):e9809. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009809.
9
Anatomical Comparison of Radiofrequency Ablation Techniques for Sacroiliac Joint Pain.经皮射频消融治疗骶髂关节痛的解剖学比较。
Pain Med. 2018 Oct 1;19(10):1924-1943. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx329.
10
A Randomized Comparison Between Ultrasound- and Fluoroscopy-Guided Sacral Lateral Branch Blocks.超声与透视引导下骶外侧支阻滞的随机比较。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 May/Jun;42(3):400-406. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000569.