• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声引导下射频消融治疗骶髂关节疼痛:一项观察性研究。

Ultrasound-guided radiofrequency Ablation for SI joint pain:An observational study.

作者信息

Loh Eldon, Agur Anne M, Burnham Robert S

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Interv Pain Med. 2022 Jul 14;1(3):100118. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100118. eCollection 2022 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100118
PMID:39238522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11372911/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

An ultrasound (US) guided RFA technique for the SIJ, utilizing bipolar RF cannula placements along the lateral sacral crest (LSC), has been proposed in anatomical studies. This study evaluated changes in pain intensity, function and quality of life following this technique.

METHODS

Patients achieving ≥50% pain relief on two blocks (one FL- and one US-guided) were included. US-guided SIJ RFA was performed with sequential bipolar lesions using two multitined RF cannulae placed along the LSC. The Pain, Disability, Quality of Life Questionnaire-Spine (PDQQ-S), which includes an 11-point (0-10) numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain intensity, was completed pre-RFA, and 2, 6, 9, 12 and 16 months post-RFA. Outcomes at 2 months post-RFA were compared between US-guided and FL-guided SIJ RFA in participants with previous FL-guided SIJ RFA.

RESULTS

31 patients were included. Statistically significant decreases in pain intensity were observed up to 9 months after US-guided SIJ RFA (Baseline NRS: mean ​= ​6.8 SD ​= ​1.6, 95%CI [6.169, 7.347]; 9 month: mean ​= ​4.8, SD ​= ​2.6, 95%CI [3.891, 5.786]; p ​= ​0.0005), and up to 12 months for PDQQ-S. A clinically significant ≥2 point reduction in pain intensity on the NRS was seen in 48.4% of participants at 9 months. 11 participants had previous FL-guided SIJ RFA; no statistically significant differences were found in pain intensity or PDQQ-S scores between US- and FL-guided SIJ RFA 2-months post-RFA.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary results suggest that SIJ RFA could be performed using US guidance. Further study is required to establish effectiveness.

摘要

目的

解剖学研究中提出了一种用于骶髂关节(SIJ)的超声(US)引导下射频消融(RFA)技术,该技术通过沿骶骨外侧嵴(LSC)放置双极射频套管针来实现。本研究评估了该技术应用后疼痛强度、功能和生活质量的变化。

方法

纳入在两次阻滞(一次荧光透视引导和一次超声引导)后疼痛缓解≥50%的患者。使用沿LSC放置的两个多针射频套管针进行连续双极损伤,实施超声引导下的骶髂关节RFA。在射频消融术前以及术后2、6、9、12和16个月完成疼痛、残疾、生活质量问卷-脊柱(PDQQ-S),其中包括用于疼痛强度的11分(0-10)数字评分量表(NRS)。对既往接受过荧光透视引导下骶髂关节RFA的参与者,比较超声引导和荧光透视引导下骶髂关节RFA术后2个月的结果。

结果

纳入31例患者。超声引导下骶髂关节RFA术后9个月内观察到疼痛强度有统计学意义的下降(基线NRS:平均值=6.8,标准差=1.6,95%CI[6.169,7.347];9个月:平均值=4.8,标准差=2.6,95%CI[3.891,5.786];p=0.0005),PDQQ-S在术后12个月内有下降。9个月时,48.4%的参与者在NRS上疼痛强度有临床意义的≥2分降低。11名参与者既往接受过荧光透视引导下的骶髂关节RFA;射频消融术后2个月,超声引导和荧光透视引导下的骶髂关节RFA在疼痛强度或PDQQ-S评分方面未发现统计学显著差异。

结论

初步结果表明,骶髂关节RFA可在超声引导下进行。需要进一步研究以确定其有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d28/11372911/75a806e8672b/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d28/11372911/d8bbb4b3265f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d28/11372911/a5953fe5cfca/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d28/11372911/00a06ea7f977/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d28/11372911/8e9e35bc7c4c/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d28/11372911/2832aa75ad82/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d28/11372911/75a806e8672b/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d28/11372911/d8bbb4b3265f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d28/11372911/a5953fe5cfca/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d28/11372911/00a06ea7f977/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d28/11372911/8e9e35bc7c4c/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d28/11372911/2832aa75ad82/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d28/11372911/75a806e8672b/gr6.jpg

相似文献

1
Ultrasound-guided radiofrequency Ablation for SI joint pain:An observational study.超声引导下射频消融治疗骶髂关节疼痛:一项观察性研究。
Interv Pain Med. 2022 Jul 14;1(3):100118. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100118. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Sacroiliac Joint Diagnostic Block and Radiofrequency Ablation Techniques.骶髂关节诊断性阻滞与射频消融技术
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2021 Nov;32(4):725-744. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2021.05.008. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
3
Efficacy of Cervical Facet Joint Radiofrequency Ablation Using a Multitined Cannula, a Technical Note, and Observational Study.多齿套管颈椎关节突射频消融的疗效:技术说明和观察性研究。
Pain Physician. 2023 Jul;26(4):E353-E361.
4
Clinical Radiofrequency Ablation Outcomes of Combined Sensory Nerve Branch and Dorsal Entry Root Zone Complex Lesions for Sacroiliac Joint Complex Pain.脊神经感觉支和背根入区联合毁损治疗骶髂关节复合体疼痛的临床射频消融疗效。
Adv Ther. 2022 Aug;39(8):3539-3546. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02183-5. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
5
Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided sacroiliac joint intra-articular injections in the noninflammatory sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study.超声引导与透视引导下非炎症性骶髂关节功能障碍骶髂关节关节内注射:一项前瞻性、随机、单盲研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Feb;95(2):330-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.021. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
6
Prospective Within Subject Comparison of Fluoroscopically Guided Lumbosacral Facet Joint Radiofrequency Ablation Using a Multi-Tined (Trident) Versus Conventional Monopolar Cannula.前瞻性自身对照研究:多齿(三叉)与传统单极套管经皮射频消融腰椎关节突关节。
Pain Physician. 2022 Aug;25(5):391-399.
7
A Cadaveric Study Evaluating the Feasibility of an Ultrasound-Guided Diagnostic Block and Radiofrequency Ablation Technique for Sacroiliac Joint Pain.一项评估超声引导下诊断性阻滞及射频消融技术用于骶髂关节疼痛的可行性的尸体研究
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):69-74. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000515.
8
Comparison of Fluoroscopy and Ultrasound Guidance for Sacroiliac Joint Injection in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain.慢性下腰痛患者骶髂关节注射中透视引导与超声引导的比较
Pain Pract. 2016 Jun;16(5):537-44. doi: 10.1111/papr.12304. Epub 2015 May 19.
9
The effectiveness and predictive factors of Sacroiliac Joint Radiofrequency Neurotomy success - A retrospective cohort study.骶髂关节射频神经切断术成功的有效性及预测因素——一项回顾性队列研究
Interv Pain Med. 2023 Aug 8;2(3):100271. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100271. eCollection 2023 Sep.
10
A Retrospective Analysis of Sacroiliac Joint Pain Interventions: Intraarticular Steroid Injection and Lateral Branch Radiofrequency Neurotomy.骶髂关节疼痛干预措施的回顾性分析:关节内注射类固醇与外侧支射频神经切断术
Pain Physician. 2022 Mar;25(2):E341-E347.

引用本文的文献

1
The effectiveness of sacral lateral branch radiofrequency neurotomy for posterior sacroiliac joint complex pain in patients selected by dual sacral lateral branch blocks; A real-world cohort study.经双侧骶外侧支阻滞筛选的患者中,骶外侧支射频神经切断术治疗骶髂关节后复合体疼痛的有效性:一项真实世界队列研究。
Interv Pain Med. 2024 Oct 30;3(4):100442. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100442. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Radiofrequency Denervation of the Spine and the Sacroiliac Joint: A Systematic Review based on the Grades of Recommendations, Assesment, Development, and Evaluation Approach Resulting in a German National Guideline.脊柱和骶髂关节的射频去神经支配:基于推荐分级、评估、制定与评价方法的系统评价,形成德国国家指南
Global Spine J. 2024 Sep;14(7):2124-2154. doi: 10.1177/21925682241230922. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of an Ultrasound-Assisted Longitudinal Axis Lateral Crest Approach to Radiofrequency Ablation of the Sacroiliac Joint.超声辅助纵向轴外侧嵴入路经皮射频消融治疗骶髂关节的评估。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Jan 1;101(1):26-31. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001733.
2
A comparison of efficacy among different radiofrequency ablation techniques for the treatment of lumbar facet joint and sacroiliac joint pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.不同射频消融技术治疗腰椎小关节和骶髂关节疼痛的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Aug;195:105854. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105854. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
3
A systematic review and update on diagnosis and treatment of new onset sacroiliac joint dysfunction after lumbar fusion.腰椎融合术后新发骶髂关节功能障碍的诊断与治疗的系统回顾与更新。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Jan 27;166(1):43. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-05918-1.
Radiofrequency neurotomy in chronic lumbar and sacroiliac joint pain: A meta-analysis.
慢性腰和骶髂关节疼痛的射频神经切断术:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(26):e16230. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016230.
4
The efficacy and safety of using cooled radiofrequency in treating chronic sacroiliac joint pain: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.使用冷却射频治疗慢性骶髂关节疼痛的疗效和安全性:一项符合PRISMA标准的Meta分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb;97(6):e9809. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009809.
5
Anatomical Comparison of Radiofrequency Ablation Techniques for Sacroiliac Joint Pain.经皮射频消融治疗骶髂关节痛的解剖学比较。
Pain Med. 2018 Oct 1;19(10):1924-1943. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx329.
6
Bias in Before-After Studies: Narrative Overview for Anesthesiologists.术前术后研究中的偏倚:麻醉医师的叙述性概述。
Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1755-1762. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002705.
7
A Randomized Comparison Between Ultrasound- and Fluoroscopy-Guided Sacral Lateral Branch Blocks.超声与透视引导下骶外侧支阻滞的随机比较。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 May/Jun;42(3):400-406. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000569.
8
A New Radiofrequency Ablation Procedure to Treat Sacroiliac Joint Pain.一种治疗骶髂关节疼痛的新型射频消融手术。
Pain Physician. 2016 Nov-Dec;19(8):603-615.
9
A Cadaveric Study Evaluating the Feasibility of an Ultrasound-Guided Diagnostic Block and Radiofrequency Ablation Technique for Sacroiliac Joint Pain.一项评估超声引导下诊断性阻滞及射频消融技术用于骶髂关节疼痛的可行性的尸体研究
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):69-74. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000515.
10
Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Medial Branch Radiofrequency Neurotomy: Can Multitined Deployment Cannulae Be the Solution?超声引导下颈椎内侧支射频神经切断术:多针套管能解决问题吗?
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):45-51. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000506.