Minnig Mary Catherine C, Arbeeva Liubov, Niethammer Marc, Nissman Daniel, Lund Jennifer L, Marron J S, Golightly Yvonne M, Nelson Amanda E
Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2024 Aug 3;6(3):100508. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100508. eCollection 2024 Sep.
To investigate the relationship between measures of radiographic joint space width (JSW) loss and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based cartilage thickness loss in the medial weight-bearing region of the tibiofemoral joint over 12-24 months. To stratify this relationship by clinically meaningful subgroups (sex and pain status).
We analyzed a subset of knees (n = 256) from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) likely in early stage OA based on joint space narrowing (JSN) measurements. Natural logarithm transformation was used to approximate near normal distributions for JSW loss. Pearson Correlation coefficients described the relationship between ln-transformed JSW loss and several versions of deep learning-derived MRI-based cartilage thickness loss parameters (minimum, maximum, and mean) in subregions of the femoral condyle, tibial plateau, and combined femoral and tibial regions. Linear mixed-effects models evaluated the associations between the ln-transformed radiographic and MRI-derived measures including potential confounders.
We found weak correlations between ln-transformed JSW loss and MRI-based cartilage thickness ranging from R = -0.13 (p = 0.20) to R = 0.26 (p < 0.01). Correlations were higher (still poor) among females compared to males and painful compared to non-painful knees. Model results showed weak associations for nearly all MRI-based measures, ranging from no association to β (95% CI) = 0.25 (0.11, 0.39). Associations were higher among females compared to males and minimal differences between painful and non-painful knees.
Despite its recommended use in disease-modifying OA drug clinical trials, results suggest that JSW loss is an ineffective proxy measure of cartilage thickness loss over 12-24 months and within a localized region of the tibiofemoral joint.
研究在12至24个月期间,胫股关节内侧负重区域的影像学关节间隙宽度(JSW)损失测量值与基于磁共振成像(MRI)的软骨厚度损失之间的关系。按具有临床意义的亚组(性别和疼痛状态)对这种关系进行分层。
我们分析了骨关节炎倡议(OAI)中一部分膝关节(n = 256),根据关节间隙变窄(JSN)测量结果,这些膝关节可能处于早期骨关节炎阶段。对JSW损失进行自然对数转换,以近似正态分布。Pearson相关系数描述了ln转换后的JSW损失与股骨髁、胫骨平台以及股骨和胫骨联合区域亚区域中几种基于深度学习的MRI软骨厚度损失参数版本(最小值、最大值和平均值)之间的关系。线性混合效应模型评估了ln转换后的影像学测量值与MRI衍生测量值之间的关联,包括潜在混杂因素。
我们发现ln转换后的JSW损失与基于MRI的软骨厚度之间存在弱相关性,范围从R = -0.13(p = 0.20)到R = 0.26(p < 0.01)。女性与男性相比、疼痛膝关节与非疼痛膝关节相比,相关性更高(但仍较差)。模型结果显示,几乎所有基于MRI的测量值之间的关联都较弱,范围从无关联到β(95%CI)= 0.25(0.11,0.39)。女性与男性相比,关联更高,疼痛膝关节与非疼痛膝关节之间差异最小。
尽管在改善病情的骨关节炎药物临床试验中推荐使用,但结果表明,在12至24个月期间以及胫股关节局部区域内,JSW损失是软骨厚度损失的无效替代指标。