Minnig Mary Catherine C, Arbeeva Liubov, Lund Jennifer L, Marshall Stephen W, Nissman Daniel B, Nelson Amanda E, Golightly Yvonne M
Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 30;20(6):e0325822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325822. eCollection 2025.
To identify trajectories of joint space width loss, a proxy measure of tibiofemoral cartilage loss, among previously injured knees. To describe the relationship of trajectory groups with sociodemographic and clinical risk factors.
Using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative, we identified right knees with a history of injury. We used group-based trajectory modeling to identify trajectories of joint space width loss over 96-months. Once trajectories were identified, we compared baseline statistics of key risk factors across trajectory groups.
Our primary cohort included 772 previously injured right knees. We also analyzed a subset of 251 more recently injured right knees. Across each cohort, we identified three distinct trajectories for men and women separately, differentiated by low, medium, and high baseline joint space width. Rates of JSW loss were similar between trajectories. Those assigned to the high baseline JSW trajectory were younger at study baseline than those assigned to other two trajectories. Among women assigned to the low baseline JSW group, mean age at the time of knee injury was older than the other two trajectories. Among both men and women, the proportion of knees that had undergone a surgery or arthroscopy was highest in the low baseline JSW group.
Among knees with a history of injury, thinner JSW may be associated with knee surgical history and older age. Moving forward, exploring additional risk factors for OA development among previously injured knees may provide new opportunities to target treatments towards those at the greatest risk for the disease.
确定关节间隙宽度损失的轨迹,这是胫股关节软骨损失的一种替代指标,在既往受伤的膝关节中进行研究。描述轨迹组与社会人口统计学和临床风险因素之间的关系。
利用骨关节炎倡议组织的数据,我们确定了有受伤史的右膝。我们使用基于组的轨迹模型来确定96个月内关节间隙宽度损失的轨迹。一旦确定了轨迹,我们就比较了各轨迹组关键风险因素的基线统计数据。
我们的主要队列包括772个既往受伤的右膝。我们还分析了251个近期受伤的右膝子集。在每个队列中,我们分别为男性和女性确定了三种不同的轨迹,以低、中、高基线关节间隙宽度区分。各轨迹间关节间隙宽度损失率相似。被分配到高基线关节间隙宽度轨迹的人在研究基线时比被分配到其他两个轨迹的人更年轻。在被分配到低基线关节间隙宽度组的女性中,膝关节受伤时的平均年龄比其他两个轨迹组的人更大。在男性和女性中,低基线关节间隙宽度组中接受过手术或关节镜检查的膝关节比例最高。
在有受伤史的膝关节中,较窄的关节间隙宽度可能与膝关节手术史和年龄较大有关。展望未来,探索既往受伤膝关节中骨关节炎发展的其他风险因素可能为针对该病风险最高的人群进行治疗提供新的机会。