Suppr超能文献

超声引导下肩胛上神经联合腋神经阻滞与单纯肩胛上神经阻滞治疗肩周炎的疗效比较:一项前瞻性、双盲随机、单中心试验。

Comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided combined suprascapular and axillary nerve block with suprascapular nerve block alone in patients with frozen shoulder: A prospective, double-blinded randomized, single-centre trial.

作者信息

Kumar Sanjay, Khuba Sandeep, Gautam Sujeet, Agarwal Anil, Chatterjee Arindam, Goyal Nitin, Mishra Prabhakar

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.

Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.

出版信息

Interv Pain Med. 2023 Jun 28;2(3):100265. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100265. eCollection 2023 Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Frozen shoulder is a troublesome disease of the shoulder joint. It leads to marked disability because of pain with restriction of active and passive movement of the joint. We aimed to determine and compare the efficacy of combined suprascapular and axillary nerve blocks with suprascapular nerve block alone for the treatment of frozen shoulder pain.

METHODOLOGY

A total of 61 patients with frozen shoulder included in the study underwent ultrasound-guided combined suprascapular and axillary nerve block (n ​= ​31) and suprascapular nerve block (n ​= ​30). All the patients were assessed for visual analogue scale (VAS) pain (0-10), simple pain score (0-5), total pain score (0-9), range of motion (abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation) of the affected shoulder joint at baseline and post-procedure at 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

RESULT

There was a significant improvement in VAS pain score, simple pain scores, total pain scores and range of motion of the affected shoulder joint in both groups at all time points as compared to the baseline. However, in the combined nerve block group the VAS scores, simple and total pain scores, abduction, and internal rotation were significantly better at 6 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The combined block provided faster and superior pain relief and improvement in function.

摘要

背景

肩周炎是一种困扰肩关节的疾病。由于疼痛伴有关节主动和被动活动受限,它会导致明显的功能障碍。我们旨在确定并比较肩胛上神经和腋神经联合阻滞与单纯肩胛上神经阻滞治疗肩周炎疼痛的疗效。

方法

本研究共纳入61例肩周炎患者,分别接受超声引导下肩胛上神经和腋神经联合阻滞(n = 31)和肩胛上神经阻滞(n = 30)。在基线以及术后7天、1个月、3个月、6个月和12个月时,对所有患者进行视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分(0 - 10)、简单疼痛评分(0 - 5)、总疼痛评分(0 - 9)以及患侧肩关节的活动范围(外展、外旋和内旋)评估。

结果

与基线相比,两组在所有时间点的VAS疼痛评分、简单疼痛评分、总疼痛评分以及患侧肩关节活动范围均有显著改善。然而,在联合神经阻滞组中,VAS评分、简单和总疼痛评分、外展以及内旋在6个月、3个月、6个月和12个月时分别显著更好。

结论

联合阻滞能更快且更有效地缓解疼痛并改善功能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8622/11372937/853691329ca2/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验