Ghosh Supradip
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Fortis Escorts Hospital, Faridabad, Haryana, India.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Aug;28(8):792-795. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24767. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
In hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) due to extensively drug resistant gram-negative pathogens, can treatment with high-dose colistin aerosolization using specific aerosol delivery protocol, improve clinical outcome in addition to systemic polymyxin-B?
In a randomized control trial, invasively ventilated adult ICU patients with HAP in whom clinicians decided to start systemic polypeptide antibiotics, were randomized to receive either intravenous polymyxin-B plus high-dose colistin nebulization (5-MIU 8-hourly) using specific protocol or intravenous polymyxin-B alone.
The study was closed early after recruiting 60% of planned patients because of slow rate of recruitment (24 patients in over 30 months). Treatment success (Primary outcome) was nonsignificantly higher in intervention group (63.66 vs 30.77%; = 0.217). There was higher rate of microbiological cure in intervention group (60 vs 9.09%: = 0.018). Numerically better secondary outcomes including fever-free days, ventilator- or vasopressor free days at day-7, ICU and hospital mortality also did not reach statistical significance. Two episodes of transient hypoxia were seen during aerosol delivery. However, overall incidences of adverse effects were not different between groups.
This study could not confirm superiority of high-dose colistin aerosolization plus systemic polymyxin-B strategy over polymyxin-B alone in treating HAP due to extensive drug resistance (XDR) gram-negative pathogens.
Ghosh S. Polymyxin B Plus Aerosolized Colistin vs Polymyxin B Alone in Hospital-acquired Pneumonia ("AEROCOL" Study): A Feasibility Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(8):792-795.
在由广泛耐药革兰氏阴性病原体引起的医院获得性肺炎(HAP)中,除全身使用多粘菌素B外,采用特定雾化给药方案进行高剂量多粘菌素雾化治疗能否改善临床结局?
在一项随机对照试验中,将临床医生决定开始使用全身多肽类抗生素治疗的侵入性机械通气成年ICU HAP患者,随机分为两组,一组接受静脉注射多粘菌素B加使用特定方案的高剂量多粘菌素雾化(每8小时500万单位),另一组仅接受静脉注射多粘菌素B。
由于入组速度缓慢(30多个月内入组24例患者),在招募了60%的计划患者后,该研究提前结束。干预组的治疗成功率(主要结局)略高,但无统计学意义(63.66%对30.77%;P = 0.217)。干预组的微生物清除率更高(60%对9.09%:P = 0.018)。包括无发热天数、第7天无呼吸机或血管升压药天数、ICU和医院死亡率等数值上更好的次要结局也未达到统计学意义。在雾化给药期间观察到两例短暂性缺氧发作。然而,两组间不良反应的总体发生率无差异。
本研究无法证实高剂量多粘菌素雾化加全身多粘菌素B策略在治疗由广泛耐药(XDR)革兰氏阴性病原体引起的HAP方面优于单独使用多粘菌素B。
Ghosh S. 多粘菌素B加雾化多粘菌素与单独使用多粘菌素B治疗医院获得性肺炎(“AEROCOL”研究):一项可行性研究。《印度重症监护医学杂志》2024;28(8):792 - 795。