Pilch Anna, Jekiełek Małgorzata, Stach Beata, Zyznawska Joanna, Klimek Marek
Institute of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Institute of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Eur J Midwifery. 2024 Sep 5;8. doi: 10.18332/ejm/191740. eCollection 2024.
The study aimed to compare the impact of the physiotherapeutic method combined with TENS and physiotherapy alone on post-cesarean pain levels and the time required for intestinal peristalsis recovery. The study was conducted at the Specialist Hospital in Kraków, from January to March 2020.
The study was designed as a parallel randomized controlled trial (RCT). Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: TENS (n=52), nTENS (n=50) and control group (n=34), based on block randomization of 6. The allocation sequence was provided using a computer-generated random list. The participants were 136 postpartum primiparous women after cesarean birth, aged ≥18 years, having a healthy newborn, with no contradictions to TENS. The TENS group received a physiotherapeutic procedure involving a 20-minute exercise program plus a 40-minute session of TENS. The nTENS group received physiotherapeutic procedure alone, and the control group was under the routine care of midwives. The pain was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 6, 7, 12 and 24 hours after cesarean birth and twice during verticalization.
TENS and nTENS groups had decreased pain intensity immediately after the intervention compared to the control group (p=0.002, p=0.027, respectively). During the first stage of the verticalization, the smallest increase in pain was observed in the TENS (p=0.044 compared to nTENS, p=0.000 compared to the control group). Within the increase in the pain score, the intestinal peristalsis recovery time was longer. In both groups undergoing physical therapy, a shortened recovery time of intestinal peristalsis was demonstrated (p=0.000).
The proposed physiotherapy program, combined with TENS and instruction, proved effective in relieving post-cesarean pain and accelerating the time to first defecation and should be considered part of the standard patient management program in maternity units.
本研究旨在比较物理治疗方法联合经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)与单纯物理治疗对剖宫产术后疼痛程度及肠道蠕动恢复所需时间的影响。该研究于2020年1月至3月在克拉科夫专科医院进行。
本研究设计为平行随机对照试验(RCT)。基于6的区组随机化,参与者被随机分配到三组之一:TENS组(n = 52)、非TENS组(n = 50)和对照组(n = 34)。使用计算机生成的随机列表提供分配序列。参与者为136名剖宫产术后的初产妇,年龄≥18岁,有健康新生儿,且无TENS禁忌证。TENS组接受了一项物理治疗程序,包括20分钟的锻炼计划加40分钟的TENS治疗。非TENS组仅接受物理治疗程序,对照组接受助产士的常规护理。在剖宫产术后6、7、12和24小时以及直立过程中两次使用数字评分量表(NRS)评估疼痛。
与对照组相比,TENS组和非TENS组在干预后疼痛强度立即降低(分别为p = 0.002,p = 0.027)。在直立的第一阶段,TENS组疼痛增加最小(与非TENS组相比p = 0.044,与对照组相比p = 0.000)。在疼痛评分增加范围内,肠道蠕动恢复时间更长。在接受物理治疗的两组中,均显示肠道蠕动恢复时间缩短(p = 0.000)。
所提出的物理治疗方案,联合TENS和指导,被证明在减轻剖宫产术后疼痛和加速首次排便时间方面有效,应被视为产科病房标准患者管理方案的一部分。