Suppr超能文献

左侧乳腺癌放疗中的深吸气屏气法:副作用与成本之间的平衡

Deep Inspiration Breath Hold in Left-Sided Breast Radiotherapy: A Balance Between Side Effects and Costs.

作者信息

Busschaert Sara-Lise, Kimpe Eva, Gevaert Thierry, De Ridder Mark, Putman Koen

机构信息

Research Centre on Digital Medicine, Department of Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

JACC CardioOncol. 2024 Jul 2;6(4):514-525. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2024.04.009. eCollection 2024 Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is an effective technique for reducing heart exposure during radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer. Despite its benefits, cost considerations and its impact on workflow remain significant barriers to widespread adoption.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of DIBH and compare its operational, financial, and clinical outcomes with free breathing (FB) in breast cancer treatment.

METHODS

Treatment plans for 100 patients with left-sided breast cancer were generated using both DIBH and FB techniques. Dosimetric data, including the average mean heart dose, were calculated for each technique and used to estimate the cardiotoxicity of radiotherapy. A state-transition microsimulation model based on SCORE2 (Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation) algorithms projected the effects of DIBH on cardiovascular outcomes and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Costs were calculated from a provider perspective using time-driven activity-based costing, applying a willingness-to-pay threshold of €40,000 for cost-effectiveness assessment. A discrete event simulation model assessed the impacts of DIBH vs FB on throughput and waiting times in the radiotherapy workflow.

RESULTS

In the base case scenario, DIBH was associated with an absolute risk reduction of 1.72% (95% CI: 1.67%-1.76%) in total cardiovascular events and 0.69% (95% CI: 0.67%-0.72%) in fatal cardiovascular events over 20 years. Additionally, DIBH was estimated to provide an incremental 0.04 QALYs (95% CI: 0.05-0.05) per left-sided breast cancer patient over the same time period. However, DIBH increased treatment times, reducing maximum achievable throughput by 12.48% (95% CI: 12.36%-12.75%) and increasing costs by €617 per left-sided breast cancer patient (95% CI: €615-€619). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €14,023 per QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite time investments, DIBH is cost-effective in the Belgian population. The growing adoption of DIBH may benefit long-term cardiovascular health in breast cancer survivors.

摘要

背景

深吸气屏气(DIBH)是一种在左侧乳腺癌放疗期间减少心脏受照剂量的有效技术。尽管有诸多益处,但成本考量及其对工作流程的影响仍是广泛应用的重大障碍。

目的

本研究旨在评估DIBH的成本效益,并将其在乳腺癌治疗中的操作、财务和临床结果与自由呼吸(FB)进行比较。

方法

使用DIBH和FB技术为100例左侧乳腺癌患者制定治疗计划。计算每种技术的剂量学数据,包括平均心脏剂量,并用于估计放疗的心脏毒性。基于SCORE2(系统性冠状动脉风险评估)算法的状态转换微观模拟模型预测了DIBH对心血管结局和质量调整生命年(QALY)的影响。从提供者角度使用时间驱动作业成本法计算成本,应用40000欧元的支付意愿阈值进行成本效益评估。离散事件模拟模型评估了DIBH与FB对放疗工作流程中的通量和等待时间的影响。

结果

在基础病例情景中,DIBH与20年内总心血管事件的绝对风险降低1.72%(95%CI:1.67%-1.76%)以及致命心血管事件的绝对风险降低0.69%(95%CI:0.67%-0.72%)相关。此外,估计DIBH在同一时期内为每位左侧乳腺癌患者提供额外的0.04个QALY(95%CI:0.05-0.05)。然而,DIBH增加了治疗时间,使最大可实现通量降低了12.48%(95%CI:12.36%-12.75%),并使每位左侧乳腺癌患者的成本增加了617欧元(95%CI:615-619欧元)。增量成本效益比为每QALY 14023欧元。

结论

尽管需要投入时间,但DIBH在比利时人群中具有成本效益。DIBH的日益广泛应用可能有益于乳腺癌幸存者的长期心血管健康。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/274b/11372305/609bf703a03c/ga1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验