• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

极高频声音和可听超声的感觉不适。

Sensory unpleasantness of very-high frequency sound and audible ultrasound.

机构信息

Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom.

Al Nahdha Hospital, Ministry of Health, Ruwi Street, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2024 Sep 1;156(3):1565-1574. doi: 10.1121/10.0028380.

DOI:10.1121/10.0028380
PMID:39240123
Abstract

Audible very-high frequency sound (VHFS) and ultrasound (US) have been rated more unpleasant than lower frequency sounds when presented to listeners at similar sensation levels (SLs). In this study, 17 participants rated the sensory unpleasantness of 14-, 16-, and 18-kHz tones and a 1-kHz reference tone. Tones were presented at equal subjective loudness levels for each individual, corresponding to levels of 10, 20, and 30 dB SL measured at 1 kHz. Participants were categorized as either "symptomatic" or "asymptomatic" based on self-reported previous symptoms that they attributed to exposure to VHFS/US. In both groups, subjective loudness increased more rapidly with sound pressure level for VHFS/US than for the 1-kHz reference tone, which is consistent with a reduced dynamic range at the higher frequencies. For loudness-matched tones, participants rated VHFS/US as more unpleasant than that for the 1-kHz reference. These results suggest that increased sensory unpleasantness and reduced dynamic range at high frequencies should be considered when designing or deploying equipment which emits VHFS/US that could be audible to exposed people.

摘要

当以相似的感觉水平(SL)向听众呈现时,可听的甚高频声音(VHFS)和超声波(US)被评为比低频声音更不愉快。在这项研究中,17 名参与者对 14、16 和 18 kHz 的音调以及 1 kHz 的参考音进行了感官不愉快程度的评定。对于每个个体,音调以相等的主观响度呈现,对应于在 1 kHz 处测量的 10、20 和 30 dB SL 的水平。参与者根据自我报告的先前症状分为“有症状”或“无症状”,这些症状归因于暴露于 VHFS/US。在两组中,VHFS/US 的主观响度随声压级的增加比 1 kHz 参考音更快,这与较高频率下的动态范围减小一致。对于响度匹配的音调,参与者将 VHFS/US 评为比 1 kHz 参考音更不愉快。这些结果表明,在设计或部署可能会被暴露者听到的发出 VHFS/US 的设备时,应考虑高频时增加的感官不愉快和降低的动态范围。

相似文献

1
Sensory unpleasantness of very-high frequency sound and audible ultrasound.极高频声音和可听超声的感觉不适。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2024 Sep 1;156(3):1565-1574. doi: 10.1121/10.0028380.
2
Effects of very high-frequency sound and ultrasound on humans. Part I: Adverse symptoms after exposure to audible very-high frequency sound.人耳可听高频声音和超声对人体的影响。第一部分:暴露于可听高频声音后的不良反应症状。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Oct;144(4):2511. doi: 10.1121/1.5063819.
3
Loudness adaptation at high frequencies.高频响度适应
J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Sep;94(3 Pt 1):1281-6. doi: 10.1121/1.408154.
4
Loudness functions with air and bone conduction stimulation in normal-hearing subjects using a categorical loudness scaling procedure.正常听力受试者使用类别响度标度程序进行空气和骨传导刺激的响度函数。
Hear Res. 2013 Jul;301:85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
5
Noise-induced hearing loss induces loudness intolerance in a rat Active Sound Avoidance Paradigm (ASAP).噪声性听力损失在大鼠主动声音回避范式(ASAP)中诱发响度不耐受。
Hear Res. 2017 Sep;353:197-203. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
6
Sensory and affective dimensions in loudness perception: Insights from young adults.响度感知中的感官和情感维度:来自年轻人的见解。
Hear Res. 2024 Dec;454:109147. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.109147. Epub 2024 Nov 10.
7
Subjective loudness level measurements and equal loudness contours in a bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus).主观响度级测量和宽吻海豚(Tursiops truncatus)的等响曲线。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Nov;130(5):3124-36. doi: 10.1121/1.3641449.
8
The just audible tonality of short exponential and Gaussian pure tone bursts.短指数和高斯纯音猝发音的刚可听音调。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jun;129(6):3827-36. doi: 10.1121/1.3573990.
9
Simple reaction time for broadband sounds compared to pure tones.与纯音相比,宽带声音的简单反应时间。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Feb;79(2):628-636. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1237-x.
10
Pure-Tone-Spondee Threshold Relationships in Functional Hearing Loss: A Test of Loudness Contribution.功能性听力损失中的纯音-扬扬格阈关系:响度贡献测试
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Jan 1;60(1):136-143. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-15-0330.