Myerson Roger
University of Chicago, Harris School of Public Policy, Chicago, IL, USA.
Hum Nat. 2024 Sep;35(3):289-306. doi: 10.1007/s12110-024-09476-4. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
We study game-theoretic models of human evolution to analyze fundamentals of human nature. Rival-claimants games represent common situations in which animals can avoid conflict over valuable resources by mutually recognizing asymmetric claiming rights. Unlike social-dilemma games, rival-claimants games have multiple equilibria which create a rational role for communication, and so they may be good models for the role of language in human evolution. Many social animals avoid conflict by dominance rankings, but intelligence and language allow mutual recognition of more complex norms for determining political rank or economic ownership. Sophisticated forms of economic ownership could become more advantageous when bipedalism allowed adaptation of hands for manufacturing useful objects. Cultural norms for claiming rights could develop and persist across generations in communities where the young have an innate interest in learning from their elders about when one can appropriately claim desirable objects. Then competition across communities would favor cultures where claiming rights are earned by prosocial behavior, such as contributions to public goods. With the development of larger societies in which many local communities share a common culture, individuals would prefer to interact with strangers who identifiably share this culture, because shared cultural principles reduce risks of conflict in rival-claimants games.
我们研究人类进化的博弈论模型,以分析人性的基本原理。竞争主张者博弈代表了常见的情形,即动物可以通过相互认可不对称的主张权利来避免对宝贵资源的冲突。与社会困境博弈不同,竞争主张者博弈有多个均衡点,这为交流创造了一个合理的角色,因此它们可能是语言在人类进化中作用的良好模型。许多群居动物通过等级制度避免冲突,但智力和语言使人们能够相互认可更复杂的规范,以确定政治等级或经济所有权。当两足行走使手能够适应制造有用物品时,复杂形式的经济所有权可能会变得更具优势。在年轻人天生有兴趣向长辈学习何时可以适当地主张所需物品的社区中,主张权利的文化规范可以发展并代代相传。然后,社区之间的竞争将有利于那些通过亲社会行为(如对公共物品的贡献)获得主张权利的文化。随着许多当地社区共享一种共同文化的更大社会的发展,个人会更愿意与明显共享这种文化的陌生人互动,因为共享的文化原则降低了竞争主张者博弈中冲突的风险。