• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类进化中的焦点协调与语言

Focal Coordination and Language in Human Evolution.

作者信息

Myerson Roger

机构信息

University of Chicago, Harris School of Public Policy, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Hum Nat. 2024 Sep;35(3):289-306. doi: 10.1007/s12110-024-09476-4. Epub 2024 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1007/s12110-024-09476-4
PMID:39240441
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11645385/
Abstract

We study game-theoretic models of human evolution to analyze fundamentals of human nature. Rival-claimants games represent common situations in which animals can avoid conflict over valuable resources by mutually recognizing asymmetric claiming rights. Unlike social-dilemma games, rival-claimants games have multiple equilibria which create a rational role for communication, and so they may be good models for the role of language in human evolution. Many social animals avoid conflict by dominance rankings, but intelligence and language allow mutual recognition of more complex norms for determining political rank or economic ownership. Sophisticated forms of economic ownership could become more advantageous when bipedalism allowed adaptation of hands for manufacturing useful objects. Cultural norms for claiming rights could develop and persist across generations in communities where the young have an innate interest in learning from their elders about when one can appropriately claim desirable objects. Then competition across communities would favor cultures where claiming rights are earned by prosocial behavior, such as contributions to public goods. With the development of larger societies in which many local communities share a common culture, individuals would prefer to interact with strangers who identifiably share this culture, because shared cultural principles reduce risks of conflict in rival-claimants games.

摘要

我们研究人类进化的博弈论模型,以分析人性的基本原理。竞争主张者博弈代表了常见的情形,即动物可以通过相互认可不对称的主张权利来避免对宝贵资源的冲突。与社会困境博弈不同,竞争主张者博弈有多个均衡点,这为交流创造了一个合理的角色,因此它们可能是语言在人类进化中作用的良好模型。许多群居动物通过等级制度避免冲突,但智力和语言使人们能够相互认可更复杂的规范,以确定政治等级或经济所有权。当两足行走使手能够适应制造有用物品时,复杂形式的经济所有权可能会变得更具优势。在年轻人天生有兴趣向长辈学习何时可以适当地主张所需物品的社区中,主张权利的文化规范可以发展并代代相传。然后,社区之间的竞争将有利于那些通过亲社会行为(如对公共物品的贡献)获得主张权利的文化。随着许多当地社区共享一种共同文化的更大社会的发展,个人会更愿意与明显共享这种文化的陌生人互动,因为共享的文化原则降低了竞争主张者博弈中冲突的风险。

相似文献

1
Focal Coordination and Language in Human Evolution.人类进化中的焦点协调与语言
Hum Nat. 2024 Sep;35(3):289-306. doi: 10.1007/s12110-024-09476-4. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
2
Human and macaque pairs employ different coordination strategies in a transparent decision game.在透明决策游戏中,人类和猕猴对使用不同的协调策略。
Elife. 2023 Jan 12;12:e81641. doi: 10.7554/eLife.81641.
3
Interaction between games give rise to the evolution of moral norms of cooperation.游戏之间的相互作用产生了合作道德规范的演变。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Sep 29;18(9):e1010429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010429. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Stochastic stability and the evolution of coordination in spatially structured populations.空间结构化种群中的随机稳定性与协调演化
Theor Popul Biol. 2013 Nov;89:75-87. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
5
Public goods in relation to competition, cooperation, and spite.与竞争、合作和恶意相关的公共物品。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 22;111 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):10838-45. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400830111. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
6
Response time in economic games reflects different types of decision conflict for prosocial and proself individuals.经济博弈中的反应时间反映了亲社会个体和自利个体在不同类型决策冲突中的表现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 13;114(24):6394-6399. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1608877114. Epub 2017 May 30.
7
[Evolution of human brain and intelligence].[人类大脑与智力的进化]
Ideggyogy Sz. 2008 Jul 30;61(7-8):220-9.
8
Cost and conflict in animal signals and human language.动物信号与人类语言中的成本与冲突。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Nov 6;98(23):13189-94. doi: 10.1073/pnas.231216498. Epub 2001 Oct 30.
9
Ancestral social environments plus nonlinear benefits can explain cooperation in human societies.祖先的社会环境加上非线性的好处可以解释人类社会中的合作。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 24;12(1):20252. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24590-y.
10
Social goods dilemmas in heterogeneous societies.异质社会中的社会商品困境。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Aug;4(8):819-831. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0881-2. Epub 2020 May 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Children, but not great apes, respect ownership.儿童,而非类人猿,尊重所有权。
Dev Sci. 2020 Jan;23(1):e12842. doi: 10.1111/desc.12842. Epub 2019 May 31.
2
Zoon politikon: The evolutionary origins of human socio-political systems.政治动物:人类社会政治制度的进化起源
Behav Processes. 2019 Apr;161:17-30. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.01.007. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
3
Complex societies : The evolutionary origins of a crude superorganism.复杂社会:一种原始超级生物体的进化起源
Hum Nat. 1999 Sep;10(3):253-89. doi: 10.1007/s12110-999-1004-y.
4
An evolutionary theory of large-scale human warfare: Group-structured cultural selection.大规模人类战争的进化理论:群体结构化文化选择
Evol Anthropol. 2015 Mar-Apr;24(2):50-61. doi: 10.1002/evan.21439.
5
The evolution of respect for property.对财产尊重的演变。
J Evol Biol. 2015 Jun;28(6):1185-202. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12648. Epub 2015 May 8.
6
Human identity and the evolution of societies.人类身份与社会的演变。
Hum Nat. 2013 Sep;24(3):219-67. doi: 10.1007/s12110-013-9170-3.
7
Rapid cultural adaptation can facilitate the evolution of large-scale cooperation.快速的文化适应能够促进大规模合作的演变。
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2011 Mar;65(3):431-444. doi: 10.1007/s00265-010-1100-3. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
8
Transmission coupling mechanisms: cultural group selection.传播耦合机制:文化群体选择。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Dec 12;365(1559):3787-95. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0046.
9
Culture and the evolution of human cooperation.文化与人类合作的进化。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Nov 12;364(1533):3281-8. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0134.
10
Male dominance rank and reproductive success in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii.黑猩猩(Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii)中的雄性优势等级与繁殖成功率
Anim Behav. 2009;77(4):873-885. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.12.014.