From the Department of Pharmaceutical and Health Economics, Mann School of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA (Padula), Division Chief of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals, St. John and Southwest General Medical Centers, Cleveland, OH (Smith), Department of Neurosurgery, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (Smith), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH (Gordon), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH (Gordon), and Schools of Medicine, Nursing, and Management, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (Pronovost).
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024 Sep 15;32(18):833-839. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00989. Epub 2024 May 24.
Technological innovation has advanced the efficacy of spine surgery for patients; however, these advances do not consistently translate into clinical effectiveness. Some patients who undergo spine surgery experience continued chronic back pain and other complications that were not present before the procedure. Defects in healthcare value, such as the lack of clinical benefit from spine surgery, are, unfortunately, common, and the US healthcare system spends $1.4 trillion annually on value defects. In this article, we examine how avoidable complications, postacute healthcare use, revision surgeries, and readmissions among spine surgery patients contribute to $67 million of wasteful spending on value defects. Furthermore, we estimate that almost $27 million of these costs could be recuperated simply by redirecting patients to facilities referred to as centers of excellence. In total, quality improvement efforts are costly to implement but may only cost about $36 million to fully correct the $67 million in finances misappropriated to value defects. The objectives of this article are to present an approach to eliminate defects in spine surgery, including a center-of-excellence framework for eliminating defects specific to this group of procedures.
技术创新提高了患者脊柱手术的疗效;然而,这些进步并不总能转化为临床效果。一些接受脊柱手术的患者经历持续的慢性背痛和其他手术前不存在的并发症。不幸的是,医疗保健价值缺陷很常见,例如脊柱手术没有临床获益,美国医疗保健系统每年在价值缺陷上花费 1.4 万亿美元。在本文中,我们研究了脊柱手术患者的可避免并发症、急性后医疗保健使用、翻修手术和再入院如何导致价值缺陷方面 6700 万美元的浪费性支出。此外,我们估计,通过将患者转至所谓的卓越中心,仅这些成本中的近 2700 万美元就可以收回。总的来说,质量改进措施的实施成本很高,但要完全纠正 6700 万美元用于价值缺陷的不当财务支出,可能只需花费约 3600 万美元。本文的目的是提出一种消除脊柱手术缺陷的方法,包括针对这组手术的卓越中心框架来消除缺陷。