• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2021 年 3 月至 12 月期间,格鲁吉亚医护人员的 COVID-19 疫苗初级系列接种有效性。

Primary series COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness among health care workers in the country of Georgia, March-December 2021.

机构信息

World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Epiconcept, Paris, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0307805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307805. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0307805
PMID:39240827
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11379210/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare workers (HCWs) have suffered considerable morbidity and mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic. Few data on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) are available from middle-income countries in the WHO European Region. We evaluated primary series COVID-19 VE against laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 among HCWs in Georgia.

METHODS

HCWs in six hospitals in Georgia were invited to enroll in a prospective cohort study conducted during March 19-December 5, 2021. Participants completed weekly symptom questionnaires. Symptomatic HCWs were tested by RT-PCR and/or rapid antigen test (RAT), and participants were routinely tested for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR or RAT, regardless of symptoms. Serology was collected at enrolment, and quarterly thereafter, and tested by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. We defined primary series vaccination as two doses of COVID-19 vaccine received ≥14 days before symptom onset. We estimated VE as (1-hazard ratio)*100 using a Cox proportional hazards model with vaccination status as a time-varying covariate. Estimates were adjusted by potential confounders that changed the VE estimate by more than 5%, according to the change-in-estimate approach.

RESULTS

Overall, 1561/3849 (41%) eligible HCWs enrolled and were included in the analysis. The median age was 40 (IQR: 30-53), 1318 (84%) were female, and 1003 (64%) had laboratory evidence of prior SARS-Cov-2 infection. At enrolment, 1300 (83%) were unvaccinated; By study end, 1082 (62%) had completed a primary vaccine series (69% BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech); 22% BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm); 9% other). During the study period, 191(12%) participants had a new PCR- or RAT-confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. VE against PCR- or RAT- confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection was 58% (95%CI: 41; 70) for all primary series vaccinations, 68% (95%CI: 51; 79) for BNT162b2, and 40% (95%CI: 1; 64) for BBIBP-CorV vaccines. Among previously infected HCWs, VE was 58% (95%CI: 11; 80). VE against medically attended COVID-19 was 52% (95%CI: 28; 68), and VE against hospitalization was 69% (95% CI: 36; 85). During the period of predominant Delta variant circulation (July-December 2021), VE against symptomatic COVID-19 was 52% (95%CI: 30; 66).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary series vaccination with BNT162b2 and BBIBP-CorV was effective at preventing COVID-19 among HCWs, most of whom had previous infection, during a period of mainly Delta circulation. Our results support the utility of COVID-19 primary vaccine series, and the importance of increasing coverage, even among previously infected individuals.

摘要

背景

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,医护人员(HCWs)遭受了相当大的发病率和死亡率。世界卫生组织欧洲区域的中等收入国家提供的 COVID-19 疫苗有效性(VE)数据很少。我们评估了格鲁吉亚 HCWs 初级系列 COVID-19 对实验室确诊 COVID-19 的 VE。

方法

格鲁吉亚的六家医院邀请 HCWs 参加 2021 年 3 月 19 日至 12 月 5 日期间进行的前瞻性队列研究。参与者每周完成症状问卷。有症状的 HCWs 通过 RT-PCR 和/或快速抗原检测(RAT)进行检测,参与者定期通过 RT-PCR 或 RAT 检测 SARS-CoV-2,无论症状如何。在登记时和之后的每季度收集血清学,并通过电化学发光免疫测定法检测 SARS-CoV-2 抗体。我们将初级系列疫苗接种定义为在症状出现前 14 天内接受两剂 COVID-19 疫苗。我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型估计 VE,疫苗接种状态作为时间变化的协变量。根据变化估计方法,根据改变 VE 估计值超过 5%的潜在混杂因素调整估计值。

结果

总体而言,1561/3849(41%)符合条件的 HCWs 登记并纳入分析。中位年龄为 40(IQR:30-53),1318 名(84%)为女性,1003 名(64%)有 SARS-Cov-2 感染的实验室证据。在登记时,1300 名(83%)未接种疫苗;研究结束时,1082 名(62%)完成了初级疫苗系列(69%BNT162b2(辉瑞-生物技术);22% BBIBP-CorV(国药);9%其他)。在研究期间,191 名(12%)参与者发生了新的 PCR 或 RAT 确诊的有症状 SARS-CoV-2 感染。针对所有初级系列疫苗接种的 PCR 或 RAT 确诊有症状 SARS-CoV-2 感染的 VE 为 58%(95%CI:41;70),BNT162b2 为 68%(95%CI:51;79),BBIBP-CorV 疫苗为 40%(95%CI:1;64)。在先前感染的 HCWs 中,VE 为 58%(95%CI:11;80)。针对有医疗记录的 COVID-19 的 VE 为 52%(95%CI:28;68),针对住院的 VE 为 69%(95% CI:36;85)。在 Delta 变体主要流行期间(2021 年 7 月至 12 月),针对有症状 COVID-19 的 VE 为 52%(95%CI:30;66)。

结论

在 Delta 变体主要流行期间,BNT162b2 和 BBIBP-CorV 的初级系列疫苗接种在预防 HCWs 中的 COVID-19 方面是有效的,其中大多数人以前都感染过。我们的研究结果支持 COVID-19 初级疫苗系列的效用,以及提高覆盖率的重要性,即使在以前感染过的人群中也是如此。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ccb/11379210/15cf93880850/pone.0307805.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ccb/11379210/c94c9ab5e41d/pone.0307805.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ccb/11379210/943dda81ffdd/pone.0307805.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ccb/11379210/fcee12ab3856/pone.0307805.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ccb/11379210/3c5e81b46d4c/pone.0307805.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ccb/11379210/15cf93880850/pone.0307805.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ccb/11379210/c94c9ab5e41d/pone.0307805.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ccb/11379210/943dda81ffdd/pone.0307805.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ccb/11379210/fcee12ab3856/pone.0307805.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ccb/11379210/3c5e81b46d4c/pone.0307805.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ccb/11379210/15cf93880850/pone.0307805.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Primary series COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness among health care workers in the country of Georgia, March-December 2021.2021 年 3 月至 12 月期间,格鲁吉亚医护人员的 COVID-19 疫苗初级系列接种有效性。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0307805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307805. eCollection 2024.
2
COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness among healthcare workers during the Omicron period in the country of Georgia, January - June 2022.2022年1月至6月,格鲁吉亚国奥密克戎时期医护人员中新冠病毒疾病(COVID-19)疫苗的有效性
PLoS One. 2025 May 21;20(5):e0311337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311337. eCollection 2025.
3
Association of a Third Dose of BNT162b2 Vaccine With Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Health Care Workers in Israel.以色列卫生保健工作者中,第三剂 BNT162b2 疫苗接种与 SARS-CoV-2 感染发生率的关联。
JAMA. 2022 Jan 25;327(4):341-349. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.23641.
4
The effectiveness of primary series CoronaVac vaccine in preventing COVID-19 illness: A prospective cohort study among healthcare workers in Azerbaijan, May-November 2021.科兴新冠疫苗对预防 COVID-19 疾病的有效性:2021 年 5 月至 11 月期间阿塞拜疆医护人员的前瞻性队列研究。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2023 Oct 3;17(10):e13147. doi: 10.1111/irv.13147. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Effectiveness of mRNA booster doses in preventing infections and hospitalizations due to SARS-CoV-2 and its dominant variant over time in Valencian healthcare workers, Spain.mRNA 加强针在西班牙巴伦西亚医护人员中预防 SARS-CoV-2 及其主要变异株感染和住院的效果随时间的变化。
Vaccine. 2024 Jul 25;42(19):4011-4021. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.05.011. Epub 2024 May 17.
6
Early effectiveness of BNT162b2 Covid-19 vaccine in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare personnel in six Israeli hospitals (CoVEHPI).六家以色列医院(CoVEHPI)医护人员中 BNT162b2 新冠疫苗预防 SARS-CoV-2 感染的早期效果。
Vaccine. 2022 Jan 24;40(3):512-520. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.11.092. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
7
Test negative case-control study of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness for symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers: Zambia, 2021-2022.针对 COVID-19 疫苗在医护人员中针对有症状的 SARS-CoV-2 感染的有效性的阴性病例对照研究:赞比亚,2021-2022 年。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 10;13(12):e072144. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072144.
8
COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness and Digital Pandemic Surveillance in Germany (eCOV Study): Web Application-Based Prospective Observational Cohort Study.德国 COVID-19 疫苗有效性和数字大流行监测(eCOV 研究):基于网络应用的前瞻性观察队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 4;26:e47070. doi: 10.2196/47070.
9
Effectiveness of BNT162b2 mRNA Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccine Against Acquisition of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Among Healthcare Workers in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Prospective Cohort Study.BNT162b2 mRNA 冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)疫苗在长期护理机构医护人员中预防严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)获得性感染的有效性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 24;75(1):e755-e763. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab918.
10
Relative effectiveness of the second booster COVID-19 vaccines against laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers: VEBIS HCW VE cohort study (1 October 2022-2 May 2023).第二剂新冠病毒加强疫苗对医护人员实验室确诊的SARS-CoV-2感染的相对有效性:VEBIS HCW VE队列研究(2022年10月1日至2023年5月2日)
Vaccine. 2025 Jan 25;45:126615. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126615. Epub 2024 Dec 25.

引用本文的文献

1
COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness among healthcare workers during the Omicron period in the country of Georgia, January - June 2022.2022年1月至6月,格鲁吉亚国奥密克戎时期医护人员中新冠病毒疾病(COVID-19)疫苗的有效性
PLoS One. 2025 May 21;20(5):e0311337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311337. eCollection 2025.
2
Vaccine Hesitancy and Associated Factors Amongst Health Professionals: A Scoping Review of the Published Literature.卫生专业人员中的疫苗犹豫及相关因素:已发表文献的范围综述
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Dec 13;12(12):1411. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12121411.

本文引用的文献

1
Primary series COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness among healthcare workers in Albania, February-December 2021.2021年2月至12月阿尔巴尼亚医护人员中新冠病毒肺炎初级系列疫苗的有效性
IJID Reg. 2023 Sep;8:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2023.04.009. Epub 2023 Apr 16.
2
Effectiveness and Safety of Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (BBIBP-CorV) among Healthcare Workers: A Seven-Month Follow-Up Study at Fifteen Central Hospitals.新型冠状病毒灭活疫苗(BBIBP-CorV)在医护人员中的有效性和安全性:15家中心医院的7个月随访研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Apr 24;11(5):892. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11050892.
3
COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness among healthcare workers: a hospital-based cohort study.
COVID-19 疫苗在医护人员中的有效性:一项基于医院的队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 2;13(5):e068996. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068996.
4
Reconsideration of Antinucleocapsid IgG Antibody as a Marker of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Postvaccination for Mild COVID-19 Patients.重新审视抗核衣壳IgG抗体作为轻度新冠肺炎患者接种疫苗后新冠病毒感染标志物的作用
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Dec 15;10(1):ofac677. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac677. eCollection 2023 Jan.
5
Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines on hospitalization and death in Guilan, Iran: a test-negative case-control study.伊朗吉兰省 COVID-19 疫苗对住院和死亡的有效性:一项病例对照试验。
Int J Infect Dis. 2023 Mar;128:212-222. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.12.024. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
6
Real-World Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines against Severe Outcomes during the Period of Omicron Predominance in Thailand: A Test-Negative Nationwide Case-Control Study.泰国奥密克戎毒株占主导期间新冠疫苗对严重后果的真实世界有效性:一项全国性检测阴性病例对照研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Dec 12;10(12):2123. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10122123.
7
Why hybrid immunity is so triggering.为什么混合免疫如此引发反应。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Dec;22(12):1649. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00746-0. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
8
Has vaccination alleviated the strain on hospitals due to COVID-19? A combined difference-in-difference and simulation approach.疫苗接种是否减轻了 COVID-19 给医院带来的压力?一种差分法和模拟法的结合。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 21;22(1):1183. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08541-x.
9
Sociodemographic and Occupational Factors Associated with Low Early Uptake of COVID-19 Vaccine in Hospital-Based Healthcare Workers, Georgia, March-July 2021.2021年3月至7月佐治亚州医院医护人员中与新冠疫苗早期低接种率相关的社会人口学和职业因素
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Jul 27;10(8):1197. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10081197.
10
Effectiveness and Waning of Protection With Different SARS-CoV-2 Primary and Booster Vaccines During the Delta Pandemic Wave in 2021 in Hungary (HUN-VE 3 Study).2021 年在匈牙利(HUN-VE 3 研究),不同的 SARS-CoV-2 基础和加强疫苗在德尔塔疫情波期间的有效性和保护作用减弱。
Front Immunol. 2022 Jul 22;13:919408. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.919408. eCollection 2022.